4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antimicrobial resistance in paediatric Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates amid global implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Pneumococcal diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children globally, and the burden of these diseases might be worsened by antimicrobial resistance. To understand the effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) deployment on antimicrobial resistance in pneumococci, we assessed the susceptibility of paediatric pneumococcal isolates to various antimicrobial drugs before and after PCV implementation.

          Methods

          We did a systematic review of studies reporting antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of paediatric pneumococcal isolates between 2000 and 2020 using PubMed and the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database (ATLAS; Pfizer). Population-based studies of invasive pneumococcal disease or nasopharyngeal colonisation were eligible for inclusion. As primary outcome measures, we extracted the proportions of isolates that were non-susceptible or resistant to penicillin, macrolides, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, third-generation cephalosporins, and tetracycline from each study. Where available, we also extracted data on pneumococcal serotypes. We estimated changes in the proportion of isolates with reduced susceptibility or resistance to each antibiotic class using random-effects meta-regression models, adjusting for study-level and region-level heterogeneity, as well as secular trends, invasive or colonising isolate source, and countries' per-capita gross domestic product.

          Findings

          From 4910 studies screened for inclusion, we extracted data from 559 studies on 312 783 paediatric isolates. Susceptibility of isolates varied substantially across regions both before and after implementation of any PCV product. On average across all regions, we estimated significant absolute reductions in the proportions of pneumococci showing non-susceptibility to penicillin (11·5%, 95% CI 8·6–14·4), sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (9·7%, 4·3–15·2), and third-generation cephalosporins (7·5%, 3·1–11·9), over the 10 years after implementation of any PCV product, and absolute reductions in the proportions of pneumococci resistant to penicillin (7·3%, 5·3–9·4), sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (16·0%, 11·0–21·2), third-generation cephalosporins (4·5%, 0·3–8·7), macrolides (3·6%, 0·7–6·6) and tetracycline (2·0%, 0·3–3·7). We did not find evidence of changes in the proportion of isolates non-susceptible to macrolides or tetracycline after PCV implementation. Observed changes in penicillin non-susceptibility were driven, in part, by replacement of vaccine-targeted serotypes with non-vaccine serotypes that were less likely to be non-susceptible.

          Interpretation

          Implementation of PCVs has reduced the proportion of circulating pneumococci resistant to first-line antibiotic treatments for pneumonia. This effect merits consideration in assessments of vaccine impact and investments in coverage improvements.

          Funding

          Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older Than 3 Months of Age: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

          Abstract Evidenced-based guidelines for management of infants and children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were prepared by an expert panel comprising clinicians and investigators representing community pediatrics, public health, and the pediatric specialties of critical care, emergency medicine, hospital medicine, infectious diseases, pulmonology, and surgery. These guidelines are intended for use by primary care and subspecialty providers responsible for the management of otherwise healthy infants and children with CAP in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Site-of-care management, diagnosis, antimicrobial and adjunctive surgical therapy, and prevention are discussed. Areas that warrant future investigations are also highlighted.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea

            Summary Diarrhoea and pneumonia are the leading infectious causes of childhood morbidity and mortality. We comprehensively reviewed the epidemiology of childhood diarrhoea and pneumonia in 2010–11 to inform the planning of integrated control programmes for both illnesses. We estimated that, in 2010, there were 1·731 billion episodes of diarrhoea (36 million of which progressed to severe episodes) and 120 million episodes of pneumonia (14 million of which progressed to severe episodes) in children younger than 5 years. We estimated that, in 2011, 700 000 episodes of diarrhoea and 1·3 million of pneumonia led to death. A high proportion of deaths occurs in the first 2 years of life in both diseases—72% for diarrhoea and 81% for pneumonia. The epidemiology of childhood diarrhoea and that of pneumonia overlap, which might be partly because of shared risk factors, such as undernutrition, suboptimum breastfeeding, and zinc deficiency. Rotavirus is the most common cause of vaccine-preventable severe diarrhoea (associated with 28% of cases), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (18·3%) of vaccine-preventable severe pneumonia. Morbidity and mortality from childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea are falling, but action is needed globally and at country level to accelerate the reduction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

              Summary Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 (GBD 2015) provides an up-to-date analysis of the burden of diarrhoeal diseases. This study assesses cases, deaths, and aetiologies spanning the past 25 years and informs the changing picture of diarrhoeal disease worldwide. Methods We estimated diarrhoeal mortality by age, sex, geography, and year using the Cause of Death Ensemble Model (CODEm), a modelling platform shared across most causes of death in the GBD 2015 study. We modelled diarrhoeal morbidity, including incidence and prevalence, using a meta-regression platform called DisMod-MR. We estimated aetiologies for diarrhoeal diseases using a counterfactual approach that incorporates the aetiology-specific risk of diarrhoeal disease and the prevalence of the aetiology in diarrhoea episodes. We used the Socio-demographic Index, a summary indicator derived from measures of income per capita, educational attainment, and fertility, to assess trends in diarrhoeal mortality. The two leading risk factors for diarrhoea—childhood malnutrition and unsafe water, sanitation, and hygiene—were used in a decomposition analysis to establish the relative contribution of changes in diarrhoea disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Findings Globally, in 2015, we estimate that diarrhoea was a leading cause of death among all ages (1·31 million deaths, 95% uncertainty interval [95% UI] 1·23 million to 1·39 million), as well as a leading cause of DALYs because of its disproportionate impact on young children (71·59 million DALYs, 66·44 million to 77·21 million). Diarrhoea was a common cause of death among children under 5 years old (499 000 deaths, 95% UI 447 000–558 000). The number of deaths due to diarrhoea decreased by an estimated 20·8% (95% UI 15·4–26·1) from 2005 to 2015. Rotavirus was the leading cause of diarrhoea deaths (199 000, 95% UI 165 000–241 000), followed by Shigella spp (164 300, 85 000–278 700) and Salmonella spp (90 300, 95% UI 34 100–183 100). Among children under 5 years old, the three aetiologies responsible for the most deaths were rotavirus, Cryptosporidium spp, and Shigella spp. Improvements in safe water and sanitation have decreased diarrhoeal DALYs by 13·4%, and reductions in childhood undernutrition have decreased diarrhoeal DALYs by 10·0% between 2005 and 2015. Interpretation At the global level, deaths due to diarrhoeal diseases have decreased substantially in the past 25 years, although progress has been faster in some countries than others. Diarrhoea remains a largely preventable disease and cause of death, and continued efforts to improve access to safe water, sanitation, and childhood nutrition will be important in reducing the global burden of diarrhoea. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Microbe
                Lancet Microbe
                The Lancet. Microbe
                Elsevier Ltd
                2666-5247
                1 September 2021
                September 2021
                : 2
                : 9
                : e450-e460
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
                [b ]Division of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
                [c ]Center for Computational Biology, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
                [d ]College of Letters and Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
                [e ]PATH, Washington, DC, USA
                [f ]Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
                [g ]Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India
                [h ]High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr Joseph A Lewnard, Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA jlewnard@ 123456berkeley.edu
                Article
                S2666-5247(21)00064-1
                10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00064-1
                8410609
                34485957
                e06b2f7c-4211-4646-a96f-abdc22b98d1f
                © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Comments

                Comment on this article