1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Real‐world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B‐cell lymphoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tisagenlecleucel (tisa‐cel) is a second‐generation autologous CD19‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL). The approval was based on the results of phase II JULIET trial, with a best overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate in infused patients of 52% and 40%, respectively. We report outcomes with tisa‐cel in the standard‐of‐care (SOC) setting for R/R LBCL. Data from all patients with R/R LBCL who underwent leukapheresis from December 2018 until June 2020 with the intent to receive SOC tisa‐cel were retrospectively collected at 10 Spanish institutions. Toxicities were graded according to ASTCT criteria and responses were assessed as per Lugano 2014 classification. Of 91 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 75 (82%) received tisa‐cel therapy. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 5% and 1%, respectively; non‐relapse mortality was 4%. Among the infused patients, best ORR and CR were 60% and 32%, respectively, with a median duration of response of 8.9 months. With a median follow‐up of 14.1 months from CAR T‐cell infusion, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 3 months and 10.7 months, respectively. At 12 months, patients in CR at first disease evaluation had a PFS of 87% and OS of 93%. Patients with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase showed a shorter PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. Treatment with tisa‐cel for patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL in a European SOC setting showed a manageable safety profile and durable complete responses.

          Abstract

          This article provides real‐world European data on the results of relapsed/refractory large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with tisagenlecleucel.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

          In a phase 1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed efficacy in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the failure of conventional therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

            Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that is refractory to primary and second-line therapies or that has relapsed after stem-cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel targets and eliminates CD19-expressing B cells and showed efficacy against B-cell lymphomas in a single-center, phase 2a study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.

              The purpose of this work was to modernize recommendations for evaluation, staging, and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A workshop was held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, in June 2011, that included leading hematologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, representing major international lymphoma clinical trials groups and cancer centers. Clinical and imaging subcommittees presented their conclusions at a subsequent workshop at the 12th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, leading to revised criteria for staging and of the International Working Group Guidelines of 2007 for response. As a result, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) was formally incorporated into standard staging for FDG-avid lymphomas. A modification of the Ann Arbor descriptive terminology will be used for anatomic distribution of disease extent, but the suffixes A or B for symptoms will only be included for HL. A bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated for the routine staging of HL and most diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. However, regardless of stage, general practice is to treat patients based on limited (stages I and II, nonbulky) or advanced (stage III or IV) disease, with stage II bulky disease considered as limited or advanced disease based on histology and a number of prognostic factors. PET-CT will be used to assess response in FDG-avid histologies using the 5-point scale. The product of the perpendicular diameters of a single node can be used to identify progressive disease. Routine surveillance scans are discouraged. These recommendations should improve evaluation of patients with lymphoma and enhance the ability to compare outcomes of clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                giacoboni@vhio.net
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                01 May 2021
                May 2021
                : 10
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v10.10 )
                : 3214-3223
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Hematology University Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
                [ 2 ] Department of Medicine Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra Spain
                [ 3 ] Experimental Hematology Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) Barcelona Spain
                [ 4 ] Oncology Data Science Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) Barcelona Spain
                [ 5 ] Department of Hematology University Hospital Virgen del Rocio Sevilla Spain
                [ 6 ] Department of Hematology Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
                [ 7 ] Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (IiSGM) Madrid Spain
                [ 8 ] Hematology Department Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca IBSAL, CIBERONC Salamanca Spain
                [ 9 ] Centro de Investigación del Cáncer‐IBMCC Salamanca Spain
                [ 10 ] Hematology Department Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
                [ 11 ] Department of Hematology Hospital La Fe Valencia Spain
                [ 12 ] Hematology Department Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
                [ 13 ] Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute Barcelona Spain
                [ 14 ] Hematology Department Institut Catala d'Oncologia Hospital Duran i Reynals, L'Hospitalet De Llobregat Spain
                [ 15 ] Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) L'Hospitalet De Llobregat Barcelona Spain
                [ 16 ] Hematology Department ICO‐IJC Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain
                [ 17 ] Department of Hematology Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Valencia Spain
                [ 18 ] Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA Valencia Spain
                [ 19 ] Department of Medicine University of Valencia Valencia Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Gloria Iacoboni, Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall Hebron 119, 08035. Barcelona, Spain.

                Email: giacoboni@ 123456vhio.net

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-9288
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7168-6538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-7969
                Article
                CAM43881
                10.1002/cam4.3881
                8124109
                33932100
                e05b9ddc-b2a1-41ee-aae4-46e117b08767
                © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 March 2021
                : 15 December 2020
                : 17 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 6277
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:16.05.2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                clinical cancer research,clinical observations,hematological cancer,non‐hodgkin's lymphoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article