3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Actions speak louder than words: the case for responsible scientific activism in an era of planetary emergency

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4
      Royal Society Open Science
      The Royal Society
      social movements, civil disobedience, ethics, climate, biodiversity, policy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The world's understanding of the climate and ecological crises rests on science. However, scientists' conventional methods of engagement, such as producing ever more data and findings, writing papers and giving advice to governments, have not been sufficiently effective at persuading politicians to act on the climate and ecological emergency. To date, governments’ decisions (such as continuing with vast subsidies for fossil fuels) clearly show that powerful vested interests have been much more influential than the amassed scientific knowledge and advice. We argue that in the face of this inaction, scientists can have the maximum amount of influence by lending their support to social movements pressing for action, joining as active participants and considering civil disobedience. Scientists seeking to halt continued environmental destruction also need to work through our institutions. Too many scientific organizations, from national academies of science to learned societies and universities, have not taken practical action on climate; for example, many still partner with fossil fuel and other compromised interests. We therefore also outline a vision for how scientists can reform our scientific institutions to become powerful agents for change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

          The human impact on life on Earth has increased sharply since the 1970s, driven by the demands of a growing population with rising average per capita income. Nature is currently supplying more materials than ever before, but this has come at the high cost of unprecedented global declines in the extent and integrity of ecosystems, distinctness of local ecological communities, abundance and number of wild species, and the number of local domesticated varieties. Such changes reduce vital benefits that people receive from nature and threaten the quality of life of future generations. Both the benefits of an expanding economy and the costs of reducing nature’s benefits are unequally distributed. The fabric of life on which we all depend—nature and its contributions to people—is unravelling rapidly. Despite the severity of the threats and lack of enough progress in tackling them to date, opportunities exist to change future trajectories through transformative action. Such action must begin immediately, however, and address the root economic, social, and technological causes of nature’s deterioration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050

            Significance Achieving a rapid global decarbonization to stabilize the climate critically depends on activating contagious and fast-spreading processes of social and technological change within the next few years. Drawing on expert elicitation, an expert workshop, and a review of literature, which provides a comprehensive analysis on this topic, we propose concrete interventions to induce positive social tipping dynamics and a rapid global transformation to carbon-neutral societies. These social tipping interventions comprise removing fossil-fuel subsidies and incentivizing decentralized energy generation, building carbon-neutral cities, divesting from assets linked to fossil fuels, revealing the moral implications of fossil fuels, strengthening climate education and engagement, and disclosing greenhouse gas emissions information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve?

              Despite three decades of political efforts and a wealth of research on the causes and catastrophic impacts of climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise and are 60% higher today than they were in 1990. Exploring this rise through nine thematic lenses—covering issues of climate governance, the fossil fuel industry, geopolitics, economics, mitigation modeling, energy systems, inequity, lifestyles, and social imaginaries—draws out multifaceted reasons for our collective failure to bend the global emissions curve. However, a common thread that emerges across the reviewed literature is the central role of power, manifest in many forms, from a dogmatic political-economic hegemony and influential vested interests to narrow techno-economic mindsets and ideologies of control. Synthesizing the various impediments to mitigation reveals how delivering on the commitments enshrined in the Paris Agreement now requires an urgent and unprecedented transformation away from today's carbon- and energy-intensive development paradigm. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 46 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                July 17, 2024
                July 2024
                July 17, 2024
                : 11
                : 7
                : 240411
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biology, University of Oxford, , Oxford, UK
                [ 2 ] Centre for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, University College London, , London, UK
                [ 3 ] Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, , Canterbury, UK
                [ 4 ] School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, , Cardiff, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-0713
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-3690
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-5045
                Article
                rsos240411
                10.1098/rsos.240411
                11251756
                39021783
                dfbcca3b-92d2-4781-8f42-0170390122b5
                © 2024 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : March 12, 2024
                : May 3, 2024
                Categories
                1004
                69
                Science, Society and Policy
                Perspective

                social movements,civil disobedience,ethics,climate,biodiversity,policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article