2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      85-Year-Old Postsurgical Complex Patient Successfully Managed Remotely at the Novel Mayo Clinic's Hospital at Home

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An 85-year-old male presented to the podiatry clinic following a 1st to 5th left toe amputation as a complication of severe peripheral arterial disease and nonhealing wound despite endovascular intervention with an angiogram. At the visit, cellulitis with gangrene of the surgical site was noted. The patient was admitted to the brick and mortar (BAM) hospital and taken to surgery for a transmetatarsal amputation of the left limb. In the immediate postoperative period, the incisional margins appeared dusky creating concern for flap viability. The medical team recommended a vascular bypass versus a below-knee amputation. However, given the age, comorbidities, and nutritional status, the family refused further surgical intervention. As such, Mayo Clinic's home hospital program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), was consulted for continued nonsurgical acute management at home. The patient was transferred to ACH and transported home three days after BAM admission to continue IV antibiotic therapy and wound care. Discharge from ACH occurred 11 days after admission to the BAM hospital. This case highlights the importance of developing health care alternatives to traditional hospitalization and demonstrates that ACH can manage highly complex, elder postoperative patients from the comfort of their homes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Telemedicine: Patient-Provider Clinical Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

          Background The novel coronavirus pandemic has drastically affected healthcare organizations across the globe. Methods We sought to summarize the current telemedicine environment in order to highlight the important changes triggered by the novel coronavirus pandemic, as well as highlight how the current crisis may inform the future of telemedicine. Results At many institutions, the number of telemedicine visits dramatically increased within days following the institution of novel coronavirus pandemic restrictions on in-person clinical encounters. Prior to the pandemic, telemedicine utilization was weak throughout surgical specialties due to regulatory and reimbursement barriers. As part of the pandemic response, the USA government temporarily relaxed various telemedicine restrictions and provided additional telemedicine funding. Discussion The post-pandemic role of telemedicine is dependent on permanent regulatory solutions. In the coming decade, telemedicine and telesurgery are anticipated to mature due to the proliferation of interconnected consumer health devices and high-speed 5G data connectivity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital.

            Studies of hospitalized patients identify safety as a significant problem, but few data are available regarding injuries occurring after discharge. Patients may be vulnerable during this transition period. To describe the incidence, severity, preventability, and "ameliorability" of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital and to develop strategies for improving patient safety during this interval. Prospective cohort study. A tertiary care academic hospital. 400 consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service. The three main outcomes were adverse events, defined as injuries occurring as a result of medical management; preventable adverse events, defined as adverse events judged to have been caused by an error; and ameliorable adverse events, defined as adverse events whose severity could have been decreased. Posthospital course was determined by performing a medical record review and a structured telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after each patient's discharge. Outcomes were determined by independent physician reviews. Seventy-six patients had adverse events after discharge (19% [95% CI, 15% to 23%]). Of these, 23 had preventable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]) and 24 had ameliorable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]). Three percent of injuries were serious laboratory abnormalities, 65% were symptoms, 30% were symptoms associated with a nonpermanent disability, and 3% were permanent disabilities. Adverse drug events were the most common type of adverse event (66% [CI, 55% to 76%]), followed by procedure-related injuries (17% [CI, 8% to 26%]). Of the 25 adverse events resulting in at least a nonpermanent disability, 12 were preventable (48% [CI, 28% to 68%]) and 6 were ameliorable (24% [CI, 7% to 41%]). Adverse events occurred frequently in the peridischarge period, and many could potentially have been prevented or ameliorated with simple strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.

              Research into adverse events (AEs) has highlighted the need to improve patient safety. AEs are unintended injuries or complications resulting in death, disability or prolonged hospital stay that arise from health care management. We estimated the incidence of AEs among patients in Canadian acute care hospitals. We randomly selected 1 teaching, 1 large community and 2 small community hospitals in each of 5 provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia) and reviewed a random sample of charts for nonpsychiatric, nonobstetric adult patients in each hospital for the fiscal year 2000. Trained reviewers screened all eligible charts, and physicians reviewed the positively screened charts to identify AEs and determine their preventability. At least 1 screening criterion was identified in 1527 (40.8%) of 3745 charts. The physician reviewers identified AEs in 255 of the charts. After adjustment for the sampling strategy, the AE rate was 7.5 per 100 hospital admissions (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7- 9.3). Among the patients with AEs, events judged to be preventable occurred in 36.9% (95% CI 32.0%-41.8%) and death in 20.8% (95% CI 7.8%-33.8%). Physician reviewers estimated that 1521 additional hospital days were associated with AEs. Although men and women experienced equal rates of AEs, patients who had AEs were significantly older than those who did not (mean age [and standard deviation] 64.9 [16.7] v. 62.0 [18.4] years; p = 0.016). The overall incidence rate of AEs of 7.5% in our study suggests that, of the almost 2.5 million annual hospital admissions in Canada similar to the type studied, about 185 000 are associated with an AE and close to 70 000 of these are potentially preventable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Case Rep Vasc Med
                Case Rep Vasc Med
                CRIVAM
                Case Reports in Vascular Medicine
                Hindawi
                2090-6986
                2090-6994
                2022
                25 February 2022
                : 2022
                : 1439435
                Affiliations
                1Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, 2321 Stout Road, Menomonie, Wisconsin 54751, USA
                2Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA
                3Division of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, 1400 Bellinger Stree, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54703, USA
                4Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-0088
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4546-551X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-1367
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-6899
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-2830
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-311X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-2815
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-7538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-3042
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-1787
                Article
                10.1155/2022/1439435
                8896952
                35251735
                df93dc58-157b-40fe-b415-2d9ba1ae79d0
                Copyright © 2022 Margaret R. Paulson et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 December 2021
                : 11 February 2022
                Categories
                Case Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article