30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increasing Seaweed Consumption in the Netherlands and Portugal and the Consequences for the Intake of Iodine, Sodium, and Exposure to Chemical Contaminants: A Risk-Benefit Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Seaweed has a high potential for nourishing the future planet. However, besides being beneficial, it also contains adverse components; this poses the question whether consumption of seaweed foods overall contributes beneficially or detrimentally to human health, and hence if their consumption should be promoted or restricted.

          Methods: This study evaluated the impact of substituting regular foods with seaweed foods in the diet, both in terms of nutritional quality ( via iodine and sodium) and food safety ( via arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury). Food consumption data from the Netherlands and Portugal (adults aged >18 years) were used, in which 10% of the amounts of pasta, bacon, and lettuce consumed were replaced by seaweed-derived products made from kelp ( Saccharina latissima). Using Monte Carlo Risk Assessment software (MCRA), long-term nutrient intake and exposure to contaminants were assessed. The results obtained for the Netherlands and Portugal were compared with data from Japan, a country that has a high natural consumption of seaweed.

          Results: This low-tier risk-benefit study reveals that an increased seaweed consumption (as assessed by the 10% replacement with seaweed products) has no consequences in terms of intake of sodium and exposure to cadmium, lead, and mercury, and the associated (absence of) adverse health aspects. The alternative scenario almost doubled the mean iodine intake in the Netherlands (to 300 μg/day) and Portugal (to 208 μg/day) and increased the average exposure to arsenic levels in the Netherlands (to 1.02 μg/kg bw/day) and Portugal (to 1.67 μg/kg bw/day).

          Conclusion: The intake of iodine and exposure to arsenic in the Netherland and Portugal were certainly higher due to the modeled increase of seaweed foods. If seaweed consumption increases close to the 10% substitution, the public health consequences thereof may trigger further research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Iodine-deficiency disorders.

          2 billion individuals worldwide have insufficient iodine intake, with those in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa particularly affected. Iodine deficiency has many adverse effects on growth and development. These effects are due to inadequate production of thyroid hormone and are termed iodine-deficiency disorders. Iodine deficiency is the most common cause of preventable mental impairment worldwide. Assessment methods include urinary iodine concentration, goitre, newborn thyroid-stimulating hormone, and blood thyroglobulin. In nearly all countries, the best strategy to control iodine deficiency is iodisation of salt, which is one of the most cost-effective ways to contribute to economic and social development. When iodisation of salt is not possible, iodine supplements can be given to susceptible groups. Introduction of iodised salt to regions of chronic iodine-deficiency disorders might transiently increase the proportion of thyroid disorders, but overall the small risks of iodine excess are far outweighed by the substantial risks of iodine deficiency. International efforts to control iodine-deficiency disorders are slowing, and reaching the third of the worldwide population that remains deficient poses major challenges.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in Food

            (2009)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food

              (2012)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Nutr
                Front Nutr
                Front. Nutr.
                Frontiers in Nutrition
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-861X
                06 January 2022
                2021
                : 8
                : 792923
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven, Netherlands
                [2] 2National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark , Lyngby, Denmark
                [3] 3Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo, Japan
                [4] 4Epidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal
                [5] 5Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR) , Porto, Portugal
                [6] 6Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal
                [7] 7Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Science, National Cancer Center , Tokyo, Japan
                [8] 8Moreforsking, Marine Ecosystems , Alesund, Norway
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ren-You Gan, Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China

                Reviewed by: Inger Aakre, Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Norway; Turid Rustad, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

                *Correspondence: Reina Elisabeth Vellinga reina.vellinga@ 123456rivm.nl

                This article was submitted to Nutrition and Food Science Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

                Article
                10.3389/fnut.2021.792923
                8770327
                35071298
                df83de68-a5bc-497c-a3ba-4064d2e41354
                Copyright © 2022 Vellinga, Sam, Verhagen, Jakobsen, Ravn-Haren, Sugimoto, Torres, Katagiri, Thu, Granby, Hoekstra and Temme.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 October 2021
                : 11 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 7, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 14, Words: 12220
                Categories
                Nutrition
                Original Research

                seaweed,risk-benefit,sodium,iodine,arsenic,cadmium,lead,mercury
                seaweed, risk-benefit, sodium, iodine, arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content270

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors1,365