8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An analysis of qualitative and mixed methods abstracts from Japanese, UK and US primary care conferences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          As research in family medicine covers varied topics, multiple methodologies such as qualitative research (QR) and mixed methods research (MMR) are crucial. However, we do not know about the difference in the proportion of QR or MMR between Japan, the UK and the US. This knowledge is needed to shape future research within countries with developing primary care such as Japan and other Asian countries. This study aims to describe the use of QR and MMR in Japanese primary care and compare this to the UK and US; then to make informed recommendations for primary care research.

          Methods

          A repeated cross-sectional study (2012–2016) based on the abstracts submitted to the annual conferences of the Japanese Primary Care Association in Japan, the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, and the North American Primary Care Research Group in the US and other North American countries. The proportions of QR/MMR among all the posters and paper presentations for each of these three conferences were assessed. Also examined were trends and types of qualitative techniques for all three countries and participants/settings for Japan.

          Results

          There were 1080 abstracts for Japan, 575 for UK and 3614 for US conferences. QR/MMR proportions were 7.5%, 15.1% and 28.1%, respectively. Japan’s proportion was lower than that of UK and US (p < 0.001). The proportion was increasing over time for the UK (p = 0.02). Steps for coding and analyses was most popular for Japan, thematic analysis for the UK and grounded theory for the US. Primary care doctors and hospitals were the commonest contexts for Japan.

          Conclusions

          QR and MMR were not as popular in primary care in Japan compared to the UK and the US, whereas their use was increasing in the UK. Approaches, participants and settings may differ among these countries. Education and promotion of QR/MMR and multi-disciplinary collaborations need to be recommended in Japan with developing primary care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year

          Background Quantitative studies are becoming more recognized as important to understanding health care with all of its richness and complexities. The purpose of this descriptive survey was to provide a quantitative evaluation of the qualitative studies published in 170 core clinical journals for 2000. Methods All identified studies that used qualitative methods were reviewed to ascertain which clinical journals publish qualitative studies and to extract research methods, content (persons and health care issues studied), and whether mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative methods) were used. Results 60 330 articles were reviewed. 355 reports of original qualitative studies and 12 systematic review articles were identified in 48 journals. Most of the journals were in the discipline of nursing. Only 4 of the most highly cited health care journals, based on ISI Science Citation Index (SCI) Impact Factors, published qualitative studies. 37 of the 355 original reports used both qualitative and quantitative (mixed) methods. Patients and non-health care settings were the most common groups of people studied. Diseases and conditions were cancer, mental health, pregnancy and childbirth, and cerebrovascular disease with many other diseases and conditions represented. Phenomenology and grounded theory were commonly used; substantial ethnography was also present. No substantial differences were noted for content or methods when articles published in all disciplines were compared with articles published in nursing titles or when studies with mixed methods were compared with studies that included only qualitative methods. Conclusions The clinical literature includes many qualitative studies although they are often published in nursing journals or journals with low SCI Impact Factor journals. Many qualitative studies incorporate both qualitative and quantitative methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Publishing qualitative research in medical journals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Japanese representation in high-impact international primary care journals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +81 53 435 2416 , makotok@hama-med.ac.jp
                taku5924@gmail.com
                ryuichiohta0120@gmail.com
                machiko@hama-med.ac.jp
                rakeshmodi4@gmail.com
                Journal
                Asia Pac Fam Med
                Asia Pac Fam Med
                Asia Pacific Family Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1444-1683
                1447-056X
                22 November 2018
                22 November 2018
                2018
                : 17
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1762 0759, GRID grid.411951.9, Department of Family and Community Medicine, , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, ; 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192 Japan
                [2 ]Shizuoka Family Medicine Training Program, 1055-1, Akatuchi, Kikugawa, Shizuoka, 437-1507 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 2033, GRID grid.258799.8, Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, , Kyoto University, ; Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
                [4 ]Faculty of Community Care, Unnan City Hospital, 96-1 Iida, Daito-cho, Unnan, Shimane 699-1221 Japan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, , University College London, ; Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Institute for Global Health, Institute of Child Health, , University College London, ; 30 Guilford Street, 3rd Floor, London, WC1N 1EH UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 6250, GRID grid.451233.2, Junior International Committee, , Royal College of General Practitioners, ; 30 Euston Square, Kings Cross, London, NW1 2FB UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-8274
                Article
                48
                10.1186/s12930-018-0048-8
                6249778
                df5bf5df-5db1-4f44-8dc2-86eb9ec8b006
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 May 2018
                : 17 November 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                qualitative research,primary health care,japan,united kingdom,united states
                Medicine
                qualitative research, primary health care, japan, united kingdom, united states

                Comments

                Comment on this article