168
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Timing of singleton births by onset of labour and mode of birth in NHS maternity units in England, 2005–2014: A study of linked birth registration, birth notification, and hospital episode data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Maternity care has to be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is known that obstetric intervention can influence the time of birth, but no previous analysis at a national level in England has yet investigated in detail the ways in which the day and time of birth varies by onset of labour and mode of giving birth.

          Method

          We linked data from birth registration, birth notification, and Maternity Hospital Episode Statistics and analysed 5,093,615 singleton births in NHS maternity units in England from 2005 to 2014. We used descriptive statistics and negative binomial regression models with harmonic terms to establish how patterns of timing of birth vary by onset of labour, mode of giving birth and gestational age.

          Results

          The timing of birth by time of day and day of the week varies considerably by onset of labour and mode of birth. Spontaneous births after spontaneous onset are more likely to occur between midnight and 6am than at other times of day, and are also slightly more likely on weekdays than at weekends and on public holidays. Elective caesarean births are concentrated onto weekday mornings. Births after induced labours are more likely to occur at hours around midnight on Tuesdays to Saturdays and on days before a public holiday period, than on Sundays, Mondays and during or just after a public holiday.

          Conclusion

          The timing of births varies by onset of labour and mode of birth and these patterns have implications for midwifery and medical staffing. Further research is needed to understand the processes behind these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Time of birth and risk of neonatal death at term: retrospective cohort study

          Objective To determine the effect of time and day of birth on the risk of neonatal death at term. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Data from the linked Scottish morbidity records, Stillbirth and Infant Death Survey, and birth certificate database of live births in Scotland, 1985-2004. Subjects Liveborn term singletons with cephalic presentation. Perinatal deaths from congenital anomalies excluded. Final sample comprised 1 039 560 live births. Main outcome measure All neonatal deaths (in the first four weeks of life) unrelated to congenital abnormality, plus a subgroup of deaths ascribed to intrapartum anoxia. Results The risk of neonatal death was 4.2 per 10 000 during the normal working week (Monday to Friday, 0900-1700) and 5.6 per 10 000 at all other times (out of hours) (unadjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.6). Adjustment for maternal characteristics had no material effect. The higher rate of death out of hours was because of an increased risk of death ascribed to intrapartum anoxia (adjusted odds ratio 1.7, 1.2 to 2.3). Though exclusion of elective caesarean deliveries attenuated the association between death ascribed to anoxia and delivery out of hours, a significant association persisted (adjusted odds ratio 1.5, 1.1 to 2.0). The attributable fraction of neonatal deaths ascribed to intrapartum anoxia associated with delivery out of hours was 26% (95% confidence interval 5% to 42%). Conclusions Delivering an infant outside the normal working week was associated with an increased risk of neonatal death at term ascribed to intrapartum anoxia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Variations in number of births and perinatal mortality by day of week in England and Wales.

            Analysis of the births that occurred in England and Wales during 1970-6 showed that they followed a seven-day cycle, being concentrated from Tuesdays to Fridays and least numerous on Sundays. This pattern became increasingly pronounced during the period examined. Relatively few births occurred on bank holidays, especially Christmas Day and Boxing Day. In general perinatal mortality was higher among babies born at weekends than among those born on weekdays. It is likely that the pattern seen in the numbers of births is associated to a large extent with elective intervention. It is not possible to draw any conclusions about the pattern seen in perinatal mortality as so far the analysis has been confined to crude rates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increased adverse perinatal outcome of hospital delivery at night.

              To determine whether delivery in the evening or at night and some organisational features of maternity units are related to perinatal adverse outcome. A 7-year national registry-based cohort study. All 99 Dutch hospitals. From nontertiary hospitals (n = 88), 655 961 singleton deliveries from 32 gestational weeks onwards, and, from tertiary centres (n = 10), 108 445 singleton deliveries from 22 gestational weeks onwards. Multiple logistic regression analysis of national perinatal registration data over the period 2000-2006. In addition, multilevel analysis was applied to investigate whether the effects of time of delivery and other variables systematically vary across different hospitals. Delivery-related perinatal mortality (intrapartum or early neonatal mortality) and combined delivery-related perinatal adverse outcome (any of the following: intrapartum or early neonatal mortality, 5-minute Apgar score below 7, or admission to neonatal intensive care). After case mix adjustment, relative to daytime, increased perinatal mortality was found in nontertiary hospitals during the evening (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.52) and at night (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.28-1.69) and, in tertiary centres, at night only (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37). Similar significant effects were observed using the combined perinatal adverse outcome measure. Multilevel analysis was unsuccessful; extending the initial analysis with nominal hospital effects and hospital-delivery time interaction effects confirmed the significant effect of night in nontertiary hospitals, whereas other organisational effects (nontertiary, tertiary) were taken up by the hospital terms. Hospital deliveries at night are associated with increased perinatal mortality and adverse perinatal outcome. The time of delivery and other organisational features representing experience (seniority of staff, volume) explain hospital-to-hospital variation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 June 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 6
                : e0198183
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Population, Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Rod Gibson Associates Ltd., Wotton-under-Edge, United Kingdom
                National Academy of Medical Sciences, NEPAL
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Rod Gibson is a partner in Rod Gibson Associates Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.

                [¤]

                Current address: Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-0638
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-2624
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-8410
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-3093
                Article
                PONE-D-17-40606
                10.1371/journal.pone.0198183
                6002087
                29902220
                df3cb2e2-6f53-4921-a4cf-0dc19066e827
                © 2018 Martin et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 November 2017
                : 11 May 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 15, Tables: 2, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: HS&DR 12/136/93
                Award Recipient :
                ‘Births and their outcome: analysing the daily, weekly and yearly cycle and their implications for the NHS’ was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, HS&DR Programme, project number HS&DR 12/136/93 and will be published in full in the Health Services & Delivery Research Journal. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Birth
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                United Kingdom
                England
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Services Research
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Labor and Delivery
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Birth
                Labor and Delivery
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Midwives
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Statistics
                Custom metadata
                The authors do not have permission to supply data or identifiable information to third parties, including other researchers, but they have permission under Regulation 5 of the Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002 to analyse confidential patient information for England and Wales without consent and create a research database which could be accessed by other researchers using the Secure Research Service at the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics (ONS). The information held includes the subset of data and the R computing code used to undertake the analyses described in this article. Anyone wishing to access the linked datasets for research purposes should apply to the Office for National Statistics and NHS Digital as well as to the Health Research Authority via the Confidentiality Advisory Group to access confidential patient information without consent. Discussions with ONS and NHS Digital about the application process are under way. In the first instance, enquiries about access to the data should be addressed to the principal investigator, Alison Macfarlane, A.J.Macfarlane@ 123456city.ac.uk .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article