6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Children’s and Adults’ On-Line Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences during Reading

      research-article
      1 , * , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While there has been a fair amount of research investigating children’s syntactic processing during spoken language comprehension, and a wealth of research examining adults’ syntactic processing during reading, as yet very little research has focused on syntactic processing during text reading in children. In two experiments, children and adults read sentences containing a temporary syntactic ambiguity while their eye movements were monitored. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences such as, ‘The boy poked the elephant with the long stick/trunk from outside the cage’ in which the attachment of a prepositional phrase was manipulated. In Experiment 2, participants read sentences such as, ‘I think I’ll wear the new skirt I bought tomorrow/yesterday. It’s really nice’ in which the attachment of an adverbial phrase was manipulated. Results showed that adults and children exhibited similar processing preferences, but that children were delayed relative to adults in their detection of initial syntactic misanalysis. It is concluded that children and adults have the same sentence-parsing mechanism in place, but that it operates with a slightly different time course. In addition, the data support the hypothesis that the visual processing system develops at a different rate than the linguistic processing system in children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

          Mathematical models have become an important tool for understanding the control of eye movements during reading. Main goals of the development of the SWIFT model (R. Engbert, A. Longtin, & R. Kliegl, 2002) were to investigate the possibility of spatially distributed processing and to implement a general mechanism for all types of eye movements observed in reading experiments. The authors present an advanced version of SWIFT that integrates properties of the oculomotor system and effects of word recognition to explain many of the experimental phenomena faced in reading research. They propose new procedures for the estimation of model parameters and for the test of the model's performance. They also present a mathematical analysis of the dynamics of the SWIFT model. Finally, within this framework, they present an analysis of the transition from parallel to serial processing. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

            The E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al. 1998; 1999) provides a theoretical framework for understanding how word identification, visual processing, attention, and oculomotor control jointly determine when and where the eyes move during reading. In this article, we first review what is known about eye movements during reading. Then we provide an updated version of the model (E-Z Reader 7) and describe how it accounts for basic findings about eye movement control in reading. We then review several alternative models of eye movement control in reading, discussing both their core assumptions and their theoretical scope. On the basis of this discussion, we conclude that E-Z Reader provides the most comprehensive account of eye movement control during reading. Finally, we provide a brief overview of what is known about the neural systems that support the various components of reading, and suggest how the cognitive constructs of our model might map onto this neural architecture.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers.

              C K Rayner (1986)
              Four experiments are reported which examined the size of the perceptual span in second-, fourth-, and sixth-grade children, as well as adult skilled readers. The results indicated that the perceptual span in beginning readers is slightly smaller than the perceptual span of skilled readers. Using a moving window technique, it was found that the perceptual span of beginning readers extends about 11 character spaces to the right of fixation; for skilled readers, the span extends 14-15 spaces to the right of fixation. Beginning readers apparently devote more of their processing to the foveally fixated word than more proficient readers, but their perceptual span appears to be asymmetric to the right of fixation as is the case for skilled readers. The results of the experiments also indicated that the size of the perceptual span is variable and can be influenced by the difficulty of the text. It is concluded that the size of the perceptual span does not cause beginning readers' slow reading rates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                17 January 2013
                : 8
                : 1
                : e54141
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2 ]School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
                University of Leicester, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HJ SPL. Performed the experiments: HJ. Analyzed the data: HJ. Wrote the paper: HJ SPL.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-29617
                10.1371/journal.pone.0054141
                3547875
                23349807
                df329414-0295-4be6-9037-103b4058aaed
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 September 2012
                : 10 December 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                This research was supported by an ESRC studentship (PTA-026-27-1912) to the first author. The second author acknowledges support from the Leverhulme Trust (Grants F/00128/AB & F/00 180/AN) and the ESRC (ES/I032398/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Mental Health
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Developmental Psychology
                Experimental Psychology
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Linguistics
                Psycholinguistics
                Structural Linguistics
                Syntax
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Human Performance
                Developmental Psychology
                Experimental Psychology
                Science Education
                Literacy

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article