1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protein restriction during pregnancy alters Cdkn1c silencing, dopamine circuitry and offspring behaviour without changing expression of key neuronal marker genes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We tracked the consequences of in utero protein restriction in mice throughout their development and life course using a luciferase-based allelic reporter of imprinted Cdkn1c. Exposure to gestational low-protein diet (LPD) results in the inappropriate expression of paternally inherited Cdkn1c in the brains of embryonic and juvenile mice. These animals were characterised by a developmental delay in motor skills, and by behavioural alterations indicative of reduced anxiety. Exposure to LPD in utero resulted in significantly more tyrosine hydroxylase positive (dopaminergic) neurons in the midbrain of adult offspring as compared to age-matched, control-diet equivalents. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging revealed an increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity in LPD-exposed offspring, where elevated levels of dopamine correlated with an enhanced sensitivity to cocaine. These data highlight a profound sensitivity of the developing epigenome to gestational protein restriction. Our data also suggest that loss of Cdkn1c imprinting and p57 KIP2 upregulation alters the cellular composition of the developing midbrain, compromises dopamine circuitry, and thereby provokes behavioural abnormalities in early postnatal life. Molecular analyses showed that despite this phenotype, exposure to LPD solely during pregnancy did not significantly change the expression of key neuronal- or dopamine-associated marker genes in adult offspring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.

            Tumour-associated cell cycle defects are often mediated by alterations in cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. Misregulated CDKs induce unscheduled proliferation as well as genomic and chromosomal instability. According to current models, mammalian CDKs are essential for driving each cell cycle phase, so therapeutic strategies that block CDK activity are unlikely to selectively target tumour cells. However, recent genetic evidence has revealed that, whereas CDK1 is required for the cell cycle, interphase CDKs are only essential for proliferation of specialized cells. Emerging evidence suggests that tumour cells may also require specific interphase CDKs for proliferation. Thus, selective CDK inhibition may provide therapeutic benefit against certain human neoplasias.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors.

              D Morgan (1997)
              Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) play a well-established role in the regulation of the eukaryotic cell division cycle and have also been implicated in the control of gene transcription and other processes. Cdk activity is governed by a complex network of regulatory subunits and phosphorylation events whose precise effects on Cdk conformation have been revealed by recent crystallographic studies. In the cell, these regulatory mechanisms generate an interlinked series of Cdk oscillators that trigger the events of cell division.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                amanda.fisher@bioch.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                12 April 2024
                12 April 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 8528
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [2 ]Metabolic Signalling Group, MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [3 ]Whole Animal Physiology and Imaging, MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.5335.0, ISNI 0000000121885934, MRC Toxicology Unit, , University of Cambridge, ; Tennis Court Rd, Cambridge, CB2 1QR UK
                [5 ]Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, ( https://ror.org/03kk7td41) Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX UK
                [6 ]Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [7 ]MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [8 ]Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC LMS, Imperial College London, ( https://ror.org/041kmwe10) Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
                [9 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, ( https://ror.org/052gg0110) Oxford, OX1 3QU UK
                Article
                59083
                10.1038/s41598-024-59083-7
                11014953
                38609446
                df3115d7-7d06-4a8b-9405-9e5d87dbd211
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 October 2023
                : 7 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: MC-A654-5QB40
                Award ID: MC_U120027516
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                behavioural methods,bioluminescence imaging,positron-emission tomography,gene expression analysis,mouse,epigenetic memory,imprinting,intrauterine growth

                Comments

                Comment on this article