0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-expandable duodenal metal stent placement for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction over the past 20 years

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Duodenal stent placement is a palliative option for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). In the last 20 years, management of gastrointestinal cancers has considerably changed. It is unknown if these changes have affected clinical outcome of duodenal stent placement.

          Methods Retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral center. Patients who underwent duodenal stent placement for GOO-symptoms due to a malignant stricture were included. Primary outcome was GOO-symptom free survival. Secondary outcomes included stent-related adverse event rates. Potential explanatory parameters such as period of stent placement (1998–2009 vs 2010–2019), prior treatments, peritoneal deposits, and stricture length were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis.

          Results A total of 147 patients (62 % male; median age 64 years) were included. After a median of 28 days after stent placement, 82 patients (57 %) had recurrent GOO-symptoms. GOO-symptom free survival was significantly lower in 2010–2019 (P < 0.01). Time period was the only independent predictor for reduced GOO-symptom free survival (HR 1.76, P < 0.01). Stent-related adverse event rates increased over time (1998–2009: 31 % vs 2010–2019: 37 %). Prior treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse events (OR 2.53, P = 0.02).

          Conclusions Clinical outcome of duodenal stent placement did not improve over time. The decreased GOO-symptom free survival and increased adverse event rate in more recent years are probably related to the chemo- and/or radiotherapy treatment provided prior to duodenal stent placement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction using self-expanding metal stents: experience in 36 patients.

          Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is seen in the setting of a variety of cancers, most commonly pancreatic. Self-expanding metal stents can be used to palliate these patients and restore the ability to eat. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic experience in the endoscopic treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Thirty-six patients (26 male, 10 female) were treated between October, 1998 and January, 2001. Data were collected from charts, endoscopy reports, x-rays, and telephone calls. A scoring system was created to grade the ability to eat. All procedures were successful. Thirty-one of 36 patients (86%) required one stent at initial endoscopy, and 5/36 patients (14%) required two or more stents. Pretreatment, 19/36 patients (53%) were nil per os, 15/36 (42%) drank liquids, and 2/36 were able to eat soft solids. After stent placement, only 1/36 (3%) was still nil per os, 13/36 (36%) drank liquids, 13/36 (36%) ate soft solids, and 9/36 (25%) ate a full diet. The improvement in ability to eat using the scoring system was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Nine of 36 patients (25%) required reintervention for recurrent symptoms. Sixteen of 36 patients (44%) had concomitant or subsequent development of biliary obstruction, of which 15 were successfully decompressed. Self-expanding metal stents are a safe and efficacious method for palliating malignant gastric outlet obstruction. The majority of patients do not require reintervention, and those that do can usually be managed nonoperatively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial.

            Both gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and stent placement are commonly used palliative treatments of obstructive symptoms caused by malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Compare GJJ and stent placement. Multicenter, randomized trial. Twenty-one centers in The Netherlands. Patients with GOO. GJJ and stent placement. Outcomes were medical effects, quality of life, and costs. Analysis was by intent to treat. Eighteen patients were randomized to GJJ and 21 to stent placement. Food intake improved more rapidly after stent placement than after GJJ (GOO Scoring System score > or = 2: median 5 vs 8 days, respectively; P < .01) but long-term relief was better after GJJ, with more patients living more days with a GOO Scoring System score of 2 or more than after stent placement (72 vs 50 days, respectively; P = .05). More major complications (stent: 6 in 4 patients vs GJJ: 0; P = .02), recurrent obstructive symptoms (stent: 8 in 5 patients vs GJJ: 1 in 1 patient; P = .02), and reinterventions (stent: 10 in 7 patients vs GJJ: 2 in 2 patients; P < .01) were observed after stent placement compared with GJJ. When stent obstruction was not regarded as a major complication, no differences in complications were found (P = .4). There were also no differences in median survival (stent: 56 days vs GJJ: 78 days) and quality of life. Mean total costs of GJJ were higher compared with stent placement ($16,535 vs $11,720, respectively; P = .049 [comparing medians]). Because of the small study population, only initial hospital costs would have been statistically significant if the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing had been applied. Relatively small patient population. Despite slow initial symptom improvement, GJJ was associated with better long-term results and is therefore the treatment of choice in patients with a life expectancy of 2 months or longer. Because stent placement was associated with better short-term outcomes, this treatment is preferable for patients expected to live less than 2 months. ( ISRCTN 06702358.). 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Metallic stent placement in the palliative treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstructions: prospective evaluation of results and factors influencing outcome in 213 patients.

              Metallic stents are a therapeutic option for patients with malignant GI obstruction. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-expandable metallic stent in 213 patients with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction and to identify prognostic factors associated with clinical outcomes. Prospective cohort study. Single tertiary referral university hospital. Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients with symptomatic malignant gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction from 2001 to 2005. Placement of a self-expandable metallic stent. Prospective data collection focused on technical and clinical success, complications, and prognostic factors associated with stent patency. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 94% and 94% of the patients, respectively, and the complication rate was 21%. The median and mean survival periods were 99 (95% CI, 78-121) and 159 days (95% CI, 116-203). The median and mean stent patency periods were 270 (95% CI, 234-413) and 324 days (95% CI, 128-412). With use of the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, chemotherapy after stent placement (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.46; P < .001) was significantly associated with an increase in the maintenance of stent patency. Single-center experience and the lack of a control group. Placement of a self-expandable metallic stent is clinically effective in patients with unresectable gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction. Chemotherapy after stent placement, albeit associated with increased migration rates, is associated with an increase in the maintenance of stent patency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endoscopy
                Endoscopy
                10.1055/s-00000012
                Endoscopy
                Georg Thieme Verlag KG (Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany )
                0013-726X
                1438-8812
                23 June 2022
                December 2022
                1 June 2022
                : 54
                : 12
                : 1139-1146
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding author M. C. W. Spaander, MD, PhD Erasmus MC University Medical Center Doctor Molewaterplein 403015 GD, RotterdamThe Netherlands v.spaander@ 123456erasmusmc.nl
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-9757
                Article
                10.1055/a-1838-5642
                9708383
                35483885
                df09eefa-9d34-4be1-94a0-a5823540078a
                The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 December 2021
                : 27 April 2022
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                8
                2
                21
                1
                Smart Citations
                8
                2
                21
                1
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content175

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors314