11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Font Size on Children’s Memory and Metamemory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, there has been a growing interest in the effect of perceptual features of learning materials on adults’ memory and metamemory. Previous studies consistently have found that adults use font size as a cue when monitoring their learning, judging that they will remember large font size words better than small font size words. Most studies have not demonstrated a significant effect of font size on adults’ memory, but a recent meta-analysis of these studies revealed a subtle memory advantage for large font words. The current study extended this investigation to elementary school children. First and fifth–sixth graders studied words for a free recall test presented in either large or small font and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for each word. As did adults, children predicted they would remember large font size words better than small font size words and, in fact, actually remembered the large font size words better. No differences were observed between the two age groups in the effect of font size on memory or metamemory. These results suggest that the use of font size as a cue when monitoring one’s own learning is robust across the life span and, further, that this cue has at least some validity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design

            Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.

              Although perceptual information is utilized to judge size or depth, little work has investigated whether such information is used to make memory predictions. The present study examined how the font size of to-be-remembered words influences predicted memory performance. Participants studied words for a free-recall test that varied in font size and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for each item. JOLs were influenced by font size, as larger font sizes were given higher JOLs, whereas little relationship was evident between font size and recall. The effect was modified when other, more valid, sources of information (e.g., associative strength) were available when JOLs were made and persisted despite experience with multiple study-test sessions, use of a forgetting scale to assess predictions, and explicit warning of participants that font size has little effect on memory performance. When ease of reading was manipulated, such that large font size words were made less fluent, the effect was eliminated. Thus, highly accessible perceptual cues can strongly influence JOLs, likely via encoding fluency, and this effect can lead to metacognitive illusions (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                28 August 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1577
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Education, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan, Israel
                [2] 2Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities and Department of Learning Disabilities and Special Education, University of Haifa , Haifa, Israel
                Author notes

                Edited by: George Kachergis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Pietro Spataro, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Italy; Paula Goolkasian, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

                *Correspondence: Tami Katzir, katzirta@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01577
                6121100
                defd0472-7386-418f-9afe-11270037b42b
                Copyright © 2018 Halamish, Nachman and Katzir.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 April 2018
                : 08 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 59, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                children,font size,judgment of learning,memory,metamemory
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                children, font size, judgment of learning, memory, metamemory

                Comments

                Comment on this article