22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence rates of dysvascular lower extremity amputation changes in Northern Netherlands: A comparison of three cohorts of 1991-1992, 2003-2004 and 2012-2013

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To analyze the incidence rates of dysvascular major lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Northern Netherlands in 2012–2013 compared to previous cohorts in 1991–1992 and 2003–2004.

          Design

          Retrospective cohort study.

          Participants

          Adults (N = 343) with first ever dysvascular LEA at ankle disarticulation or more proximal levels. The median age (interquartile range) was 74.2 years (64.5–81.9), 64% were male and 55% had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM).

          Main outcome measures

          Crude and age-standardized incidence rates of major LEA per 100.000 person-years.

          Results

          Crude incidence rate (IR) of first ever major LEA in 2012–2013 was 9.9 per 100.000 person-years, while the age-standardized IR was 7.7 per 100.000 person-years. A Poisson regression analysis showed that amputation rates among men were 2.3 times higher compared to women (95%CI 1.9–2.6), while in 2012–2013 the population aged >63 years had decreased amputation rates compared to 1991–1992. In the DM population the crude IR decreased from 142.6 per 100.000 person-years in 2003–2004 to 89.2 per 100.000 person-years in 2012–2013 (p<0.001).

          Conclusions

          In 2012–2013 a decrease in age-standardized IR for the general population and a decrease in crude IR for the DM population were observed compared to cohorts from the previous two decades, despite considerable shifts in the age distribution of the Dutch population towards more elderly people and increased prevalence of DM. These findings might suggest that improved treatment of patients at risk of dysvascular amputations is associated with reduced incidence rates of major LEA at the population level.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lower extremity amputations--a review of global variability in incidence.

          To quantify global variation in the incidence of lower extremity amputations in light of the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus. An electronic search was performed using the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from 1989 until 2010 for incidence of lower extremity amputation. The literature review conformed to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. Incidence of all forms of lower extremity amputation ranges from 46.1 to 9600 per 10(5) in the population with diabetes compared with 5.8-31 per 10(5) in the total population. Major amputation ranges from 5.6 to 600 per 10(5) in the population with diabetes and from 3.6 to 68.4 per 10(5) in the total population. Significant reductions in incidence of lower extremity amputation have been shown in specific at-risk populations after the introduction of specialist diabetic foot clinics. Significant global variation exists in the incidence of lower extremity amputation. Ethnicity and social deprivation play a significant role but it is the role of diabetes and its complications that is most profound. Lower extremity amputation reporting methods demonstrate significant variation with no single standard upon which to benchmark care. Effective standardized reporting methods of major, minor and at-risk populations are needed in order to quantify and monitor the growing multidisciplinary team effect on lower extremity amputation rates globally. © 2011 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2011 Diabetes UK.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States.

            The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive perspective on the epidemiology and time trends in the incidence of limb amputations and limb deficiency in the United States. Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 1988 through 1996 were used to calculate rates of congenital deficiency, trauma-related, cancer-related, and dysvascular amputations in the United States. Trends over time in adjusted rates were then examined using linear regression techniques. Dysvascular amputations accounted for 82% of limb loss discharges and increased over the period studied. Over all years, the estimated increase in the rate of dysvascular amputations was 27%. Rates of trauma-related and cancer-related amputations both declined by approximately half. The incidence of congenital deficiencies remained stable. The risk of amputations increased with age for all causes and was highest among blacks having dysvascular amputations. Increasing risk of dysvascular amputations, particularly among elderly and minority populations, is of concern and warrants further investigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Incidence of lower extremity amputations in the diabetic compared with the non-diabetic population: A systematic review

              Lower extremity amputation (LEA) in patients with diabetes results in high mortality, reduced quality of life, and increased medical costs. Exact data on incidences of LEA in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are important for improvements in preventative diabetic foot care, avoidance of fatal outcomes, as well as a solid basis for health policy and the economy. However, published data are conflicting, underlining the necessity for the present systematic review of population-based studies on incidence, relative risks and changes of amputation rates over time. It was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nineteen out of 1582 studies retrieved were included in the analysis. The incidence of LEA in the diabetic population ranged from 78 to 704 per 100,000 person-years and the relative risks between diabetic and non-diabetic patients varied between 7.4 and 41.3. Study designs, statistical methods, definitions of major and minor amputations, as well as the methods to identify patients with diabetes differed greatly, explaining in part these considerable differences. Some studies found a decrease in incidence of LEA as well as relative risks over time. This obvious lack of evidence should be overcome by new studies using a standardized design with comparable methods and definitions. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD4201501780
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                24 September 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 9
                : e0204623
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
                [2 ] Roessingh Center for Rehabilitation, Enschede, the Netherlands
                [3 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
                [4 ] Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
                Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, QATAR
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                [¤]

                Current address: University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, RB Groningen, the Netherlands.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-841X
                Article
                PONE-D-18-19277
                10.1371/journal.pone.0204623
                6152988
                30248158
                dede6101-d483-4c0a-9ec0-f26f7b9f4072
                © 2018 Fard et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 28 June 2018
                : 11 September 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Endocrinology
                Endocrine Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Metabolic Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                Netherlands
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Metrics
                Age Distribution
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                European People
                Dutch People
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Geriatrics
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Elderly
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Europe
                Custom metadata
                The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6965339. The University Medical Ethical Committee was consulted and approval was obtained prior to data collection (M15.176087). Additionally, approval in each of the participating hospitals was provided by the Board of Directors or the local Medical Ethical Committees. Accordingly in the study protocol and consultation of the Medical Ethical Committees, guarantees are provided by the researchers that the database is encrypted and stored on a secure location. For the current study an aggregated database is available, in which the data are not at the patient level, but in aggregated in 5-year age categories.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article