10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Doctors identify regulatory barriers for their patients with type 2 diabetes to access the nutritional expertise of dietitians

      , ,
      Australian Journal of Primary Health
      CSIRO Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Diet is central to the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and better outcomes are achieved when the dietary intervention is delivered by a dietitian. Yet, many people with T2D never see a dietitian. It has been proposed that doctors prefer to provide the dietary advice themselves or rely on medication to treat their patients instead of referring them to a dietitian. This study aimed to collect the opinions and perspectives of doctors with regard to the dietary management of people with T2D in Australia. GPs and physicians treating people with T2D were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews conducted over the telephone. Inductive thematic analysis of content was conducted. Five GPs and seven physicians participated in the study. The qualitative analysis identified four main themes: the importance and role of diet in the management of T2D; the perceived value of dietetic care; access to dietetic services; and patients’ motivation to consult a dietitian. All participants acknowledged the importance of diet in the treatment of T2D and all but one preferred to refer patients to a dietitian for nutritional management. Among the reported barriers to accessing dietetic services were: specialist physicians’ lack of access to the national referral scheme for chronic conditions; patients’ financial circumstances; and inadequacy of the number of subsidised sessions. It is important to facilitate and subsidise access to dietetic services through existing mechanisms by increasing the number of visits on the chronic disease management scheme and providing referral rights to specialist physicians.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

              Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Australian Journal of Primary Health
                Aust. J. Prim. Health
                CSIRO Publishing
                1448-7527
                2021
                2021
                : 27
                : 4
                : 312
                Article
                10.1071/PY20228
                33352088
                de695cd1-e4ea-4ca2-928c-9a09502ee246
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article