6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reference values for MRI‐derived psoas and paraspinal muscles and macroscopic fat infiltrations in paraspinal muscles in children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sarcopenia, defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass, is a novel term associated with adverse outcomes in children. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a safe and precise technique for measuring tissue compartments and is commonly used in most routine paediatric imaging protocols. Currently, there is a lack of MRI‐derived normative data which can help in determining the level of sarcopenia. This study aimed to introduce reference values of total psoas muscle area (tPMA), total paraspinal muscle area (tPSMA), and total macroscopic fat infiltrations of the PSMA (tMFI).

          Methods

          In this retrospective study, the local database was searched for abdominal and pelvic region MRI studies of children aged from 1 to 18 years (mean age (standard deviation (SD)) of 9.8 (5.5) years) performed in the years 2010–2021. Children with chronic diseases and a history of surgical interventions were excluded from the analysis. Finally, a total of 465 healthy children ( n = 233 girls, n = 232 boys) were enrolled in the study. The values of the tPMA, tPMSA, and tMFI were measured in square centimetres (cm 2) at the level of the L4/L5 intervertebral disc as the sum of the left and right regions. Age‐specific and sex‐specific muscle, fat, and body mass index percentile charts were constructed using the LMS method. Inter‐observer agreement and intra‐observer reproducibility were assessed using the Bland–Altman plots.

          Results

          Both tPMA and tPSMA showed continuous increases in size (in cm 2) throughout all age groups. At the age of 18, the median tPMA areas reached 26.37 cm 2 in girls and 40.43 cm 2 in boys. Corresponding tPSMA values were higher, reaching the level of 40.76 cm 2 in girls and 56.66 cm 2 in boys. The mean value of tMFI within the paraspinal muscles was 5.0% (SD 3.65%) of their total area in girls and 3.5% (SD 2.25%) in boys with the actual difference between sexes up to 0.96 cm 2. Excellent intra‐observer reproducibility and inter‐observer agreement were noted. Actual mean differences for tPMA were at the level of 0.43 and 0.39 cm 2, respectively. Mean bias for tPSMA was 0.1 cm 2 for inter‐observer and 0.05 cm 2 for intra‐observer measurements.

          Conclusions

          Our findings demonstrate novel and highly reproducible sex‐specific MRI‐derived reference values of tPMS, tPSMA, and tMFI at the level of the L4/L5 intervertebral disc for children from 1 to 18 years old, which may guide a clinician in the assessment of sarcopenia, a prognostic outcome marker in children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring agreement in method comparison studies

          Agreement between two methods of clinical measurement can be quantified using the differences between observations made using the two methods on the same subjects. The 95% limits of agreement, estimated by mean difference +/- 1.96 standard deviation of the differences, provide an interval within which 95% of differences between measurements by the two methods are expected to lie. We describe how graphical methods can be used to investigate the assumptions of the method and we also give confidence intervals. We extend the basic approach to data where there is a relationship between difference and magnitude, both with a simple logarithmic transformation approach and a new, more general, regression approach. We discuss the importance of the repeatability of each method separately and compare an estimate of this to the limits of agreement. We extend the limits of agreement approach to data with repeated measurements, proposing new estimates for equal numbers of replicates by each method on each subject, for unequal numbers of replicates, and for replicated data collected in pairs, where the underlying value of the quantity being measured is changing. Finally, we describe a nonparametric approach to comparing methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards.

            T. J. Cole (1990)
            It is now common practice to express child growth status in the form of SD scores. The LMS method provides a way of obtaining normalized growth centile standards which simplifies this assessment, and which deals quite generally with skewness which may be present in the distribution of the measurement (eg height, weight, circumferences or skinfolds). It assumes that the data can be normalized by using a power transformation, which stretches one tail of the distribution and shrinks the other, removing the skewness. The optimal power to obtain normality is calculated for each of a series of age groups and the trend summarized by a smooth (L) curve. Trends in the mean (M) and coefficient of variation (S) are similarly smoothed. The resulting L, M and S curves contain the information to draw any centile curve, and to convert measurements (even extreme values) into exact SD scores. A table giving approximate standard errors for the smoothed centiles is provided. The method, which is illustrated with US girls' weight data, should prove useful both for the construction and application of growth standards.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard

              Abstract Background All proposed definitions of sarcopenia include the measurement of muscle mass, but the techniques and threshold values used vary. Indeed, the literature does not establish consensus on the best technique for measuring lean body mass. Thus, the objective measurement of sarcopenia is hampered by limitations intrinsic to assessment tools. The aim of this study was to review the methods to assess muscle mass and to reach consensus on the development of a reference standard. Methods Literature reviews were performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face‐to‐face meetings were organized for the whole group to make amendments and discuss further recommendations. Results A wide range of techniques can be used to assess muscle mass. Cost, availability, and ease of use can determine whether the techniques are better suited to clinical practice or are more useful for research. No one technique subserves all requirements but dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry could be considered as a reference standard (but not a gold standard) for measuring muscle lean body mass. Conclusions Based on the feasibility, accuracy, safety, and low cost, dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry can be considered as the reference standard for measuring muscle mass.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mpiskunowicz@wp.pl
                Journal
                J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
                J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
                10.1007/13539.2190-6009
                JCSM
                Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2190-5991
                2190-6009
                19 July 2022
                October 2022
                : 13
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/jcsm.v13.5 )
                : 2515-2524
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiology Medical University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
                [ 2 ] Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
                [ 3 ] Department of Human Physiology Medical University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
                [ 4 ] Department of Prevention and Medical Education Medical University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
                [ 5 ] Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence to: Maciej Piskunowicz, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Mariana Smoluchowskiego 17, 80‐214 Gdansk, Poland. Tel: +48 58 349 36 80, Email: mpiskunowicz@ 123456wp.pl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7999-2791
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3680-0953
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6533-5774
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-6216
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-5463
                Article
                JCSM13049 JCSM-D-22-00030
                10.1002/jcsm.13049
                9530503
                35851581
                de5b9e7a-7577-48aa-8fe5-8942bfdb02b6
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 June 2022
                : 12 January 2022
                : 13 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 10, Words: 4712
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:04.10.2022

                Orthopedics
                sarcopenia,children,normative values,psoas and parasipinal muscles,intramuscular fat
                Orthopedics
                sarcopenia, children, normative values, psoas and parasipinal muscles, intramuscular fat

                Comments

                Comment on this article