19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election

      , ,
      American Political Science Review
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Electoral research acknowledges the growing significance of the mass media in contemporary campaigns, but scholars are divided on the nature of this influence. Using a unique database that includes both media content and public opinion, we examine the flow of partisan information from newspapers to the voters and assess the press's role in electoral politics and citizen learning. We find that the American press does not present clear and singular messages about presidential elections but, rather, multiple messages about the candidates and the campaign. In addition, perception of the information is shaped as much by an individual's political views as by the objective content. Despite the mixed messages, we find that a newspaper's editorial content is significantly related to candidate preferences in 1992. These results challenge the minimal effects interpretation of the media, because local newspapers can play a significant role in providing cues that influence voters' electoral calculus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.

            Analyses of the persuasive effects of media exposure outside the laboratory have generally produced negative results. I attribute such nonfindings in part to carelessness regarding the inferential consequences of measurement error and in part to limitations of research design. In an analysis of opinion change during the 1980 presidential campaign, adjusting for measurement error produces several strong media exposure effects, especially for network television news. Adjusting for measurement error also makes preexisting opinions look much more stable, suggesting that the new information absorbed via media exposure must be about three times as distinctive as has generally been supposed in order to account for observed patterns of opinion change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                American Political Science Review
                Am Polit Sci Rev
                JSTOR
                0003-0554
                1537-5943
                March 1998
                August 2014
                : 92
                : 01
                : 111-126
                Article
                10.2307/2585932
                de0ea36e-d182-4477-9192-542269e4a7cf
                © 1998
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article