12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors associated with female genital mutilation: a systematic review and synthesis of national, regional and community-based studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the factors that influence female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C).

          Methods

          Searches were conducted in Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase and the grey literature from 2009 to March 2020 with no language restrictions, using related MESH terms and keywords. Studies were included if they were quantitative and examined factors associated with FGM/C. Two researchers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed study quality. The direction, strength and consistency of the association were evaluated for determinants, presented as a descriptive summary, and were disaggregated by age and region.

          Results

          Of 2230 studies identified, 54 published articles were included. The majority of studies were from the African Region (n=29) followed by the Eastern Mediterranean Region (n=18). A lower level of maternal education, family history of FGM/C, or belonging to the Muslim religion (in certain contexts) increased the likelihood of FGM/C. The majority of studies that examined higher paternal education (for girls only) and living in an urban region showed a reduced likelihood of FGM/C, while conflicting evidence remained for wealth. Several studies reported that FGM/C literacy, and low community FGM/C prevalence were associated with a reduced likelihood of FGM/C.

          Conclusions

          There were several characteristics that appear to be associated with FGM/C, and these will better enable the targeting of policies and interventions. Importantly, parental education may be instrumental in enabling communities and countries to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Conditions As Fundamental Causes of Disease

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries

              Background Unsafe abortion is one of the commonest causes of maternal mortality. Abortion-related maternal deaths are higher in countries with the most restrictive abortion laws. We assess whether maternal mortality varies within and between countries over time according to the flexibility of abortion laws (the number of reasons a woman can have an abortion). Method We conducted an ecological study to assess the association between abortion laws and maternal mortality in 162 countries between 1985 and 2013. Aggregate-level data on abortion laws and maternal mortality were extracted from United Nations (UN), and World Health Organization’s (WHO) database respectively. A flexibility score of abortion laws (Score 0–7) was calculated by summing the number of reasons for which abortion was legally allowed in each country. The outcome was maternal mortality ratio (MMR), which represented maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. MMR was modelled as a continuous variable and flexibility score as an ordinal ranked variable (categories 0–7 with 0 as the reference, and   = 3). We used fixed effects linear regression models to estimate the association between flexibility score and MMR, adjusting for gross domestic product per capita (GDP per capita), and time in five-year intervals. Results Compared to when a country’s flexibility score was < 3, maternal deaths were reduced by 45 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: -64, − 26) when the flexibility score increased ≥3, after adjusting for the GDP per capita and five-year time intervals. With the exception of a flexibility score 6, MMR was lower when higher than zero. This may indicate the role of other country- specific effects. Conclusion This study provides evidence that abortion law reform in countries with restricted abortion laws may reduce maternal mortality. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Sex Reprod Health
                BMJ Sex Reprod Health
                familyplanning
                bmjsrh
                BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2515-1991
                2515-2009
                July 2022
                9 March 2022
                : 48
                : 3
                : 169-178
                Affiliations
                [1] departmentCenter of Research on Population and Health , Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut , Beirut, Lebanon
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Stephen J McCall, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; sm227@ 123456aub.edu.lb
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3610-3816
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-7010
                Article
                bmjsrh-2021-201399
                10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201399
                9279756
                35264420
                ddf617da-9e60-4514-927d-07aaee636734
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 October 2021
                : 16 February 2022
                Categories
                Review
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                epidemiology,circumcision, female
                epidemiology, circumcision, female

                Comments

                Comment on this article