11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty - a material analysis with special reference to optical quality assessment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Laboratory analysis and optical quality assessment of explanted hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with clinically significant opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK and DSAEK).

          Methods

          Thirteen opacified IOLs after posterior lamellar keratoplasty, 8 after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), 3 after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and 2 after both DSAEK and DMEK were analysed in our laboratory. Analyses included optical bench assessment for optical quality, light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS).

          Results

          In all IOLs the opacification was caused by a thin layer of calciumphosphate that had accumulated underneath the anterior optical surface of the IOLs in the area spared by the pupil/anterior capsulorhexis. The calcifications lead to a significant deterioration of the modulation transfer function across all spatial frequencies of the affected IOLs.

          Conclusions

          The instillation of exogenous material such as air or gas into the anterior chamber increases the risk for opacification of hydrophilic IOLs irrespective of the manufacturer or the exact composition of the hydrophilic lens material. It is recommended to avoid the use of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs in patients with endothelial dystrophy that will likely require procedures involving the intracameral instillation of air or gas, such as DMEK or DS(A)EK.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

          To describe Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with organ cultured Descemet membrane (DM) in a human cadaver eye model and a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. In 10 human cadaver eyes and 1 patient eye, a 3.5-mm clear corneal tunnel incision was made. The anterior chamber was filled with air, and the DM was stripped off from the posterior stroma. From organ-cultured donor corneo-scleral rims, 9.0-mm-diameter "DM rolls" were harvested. Each donor DM roll was inserted into a recipient anterior chamber, positioned onto the posterior stroma, and kept in position by completely filling the anterior chamber with air for 30 minutes. In all recipient eyes, the donor DM maintained its position after a 30-minute air-fill of the anterior chamber followed by an air-liquid exchange. In the patient's eye, 1 week after transplantation, best-corrected visual acuity was 1.0 (20/20) with the patient's preoperative refraction, and the endothelial cell density averaged 2350 cells/mm. DMEK may provide quick visual rehabilitation in the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders by transplantation of an organ-cultured DM transplanted through a clear corneal tunnel incision. DMEK may be a highly accessible procedure to corneal surgeons, because donor DM sheets can be prepared from preserved corneo-scleral rims.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.

            To evaluate early visual and refractive outcomes following treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction with a corneal transplantation technique, Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Visual and refractive outcomes of the first 50 consecutive cases of DSEK performed by a single surgeon between December 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. The DSEK technique consisted of stripping Descemet's membrane and endothelium from a recipient cornea and transplanting the posterior stroma and endothelium of a donor cornea through a 5-mm incision. Results are reported for 50 eyes in 47 patients (30 women and 17 men). Mean patient age at surgery was 70 +/- 12 years (range: 34 to 89 years). Five eyes were treated for corneal edema or bullous keratopathy and 45 for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Seven eyes were phakic and 43 were pseudophakic. Six months after surgery, mean manifest cylinder was 1.5 +/- 0.94 diopters (D), unchanged from preoperative cylinder of 1.5 +/- 1.0 D. Mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was 0.15 +/- 1.5 D at 6-month follow-up compared with -0.36 +/- 1.4 D preoperatively (P = .10) At 3- and 6-month follow-up, significant improvement was noted in mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity compared with the preoperative mean of 20/100 (P = .007). At 6-month follow-up, 31 (62%) eyes refracted to > or = 20/40 and 38 (76%) eyes saw > or = 20/50. Compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty, DSEK causes minimal refractive change and provides rapid visual recovery for patients with endothelial dysfunction. This technique maintains the structural integrity of the cornea by preserving the recipient's epithelium, Bowman's layer, and entire stromal thickness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Glistenings and surface light scattering in intraocular lenses.

              Glistenings are fluid-filled microvacuoles that form within the intraocular lens (IOL) optic when the IOL is in an aqueous environment. They are observed in all types of IOLs but have been mainly associated with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Experimental and clinical studies suggest the various hydrophobic acrylic IOLs on the market exhibit different tendencies toward glistenings. Factors influencing glistening formation include IOL material composition, manufacturing technique, packaging, associated conditions such as glaucoma or those leading to breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier, as well as concurrent use of ocular medications. Although the impact of glistenings on postoperative visual function and the evolution of glistenings in the late postoperative period remain controversial, IOL explantation has rarely been reported. The phenomenon of surface light scattering has also been described in association with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Its mechanism of formation is controversial but may be related to long-term phase separation water near the IOL surface, although not seen as microvacuoles. The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                BertConstantin.Giers@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                tandogan@mac.com
                Gerd.Auffarth@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                sashimi0@naver.com
                Florian.Auerbach@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Saadettin.Sel@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                christian.mayer@mri.tum.de
                Ramin.Khoramnia@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Journal
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2415
                22 August 2017
                22 August 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 150
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, GRID grid.7700.0, International Vision Correction Research Centre and the David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology, , University of Heidelberg, ; INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2181 989X, GRID grid.264381.a, Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, , Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, ; Seoul, South Korea
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0477 2438, GRID grid.15474.33, Eye Clinic, , Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, ; Munich, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-016X
                Article
                546
                10.1186/s12886-017-0546-8
                5568293
                28830376
                ddf29bf9-8011-4b24-a038-9e1922871719
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 June 2017
                : 14 August 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007316, Klaus Tschira Stiftung;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                cornea,fuchs endothelial dystrophy,posterior lamellar keratoplasty,descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,cataract surgery,intraocular lens,optical quality,complications,iol explantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article