Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Use of anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies in kidney transplant recipients with COVID‐19: Efficacy, ethnic and racial disparities

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Organ transplant recipients may not mount an adequate immune response to COVID‐19 infection and therefore may benefit greatly from passive immunization with anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which have been shown to decrease hospitalization rates in the general outpatient population. We evaluated the efficacy of mAb therapy in decreasing hospitalizations or emergency room (ER) visits among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with COVID‐19. We identified KTR with COVID‐19 between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. Patients were excluded if they had multi‐organ transplant or hospital‐acquired COVID‐19. We studied 95 KTR; 20 received mAb. mAb administration was associated with a significant decrease in hospitalizations or ER visits (15% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). This association remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders, and analysis of mAb administration as a time‐dependent variable, with day of symptom onset as day 1 (adjusted HR 0.216, p = 0.04). Black or Hispanic patients were less likely to receive mAb and more likely to be admitted to the hospital or visit the ER. In our KTR population, mAb therapy for COVID‐19 may have helped decrease hospitalizations and ER visits. Healthcare inequities, including access to investigational treatments, have been exacerbated by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Antiviral mAbs are a promising therapeutic modality, especially for immunocompromised patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          REGN-COV2, a Neutralizing Antibody Cocktail, in Outpatients with Covid-19

          Abstract Background Recent data suggest that complications and death from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) may be related to high viral loads. Methods In this ongoing, double-blind, phase 1–3 trial involving nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19, we investigated two fully human, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein, used in a combined cocktail (REGN-COV2) to reduce the risk of the emergence of treatment-resistant mutant virus. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 2.4 g of REGN-COV2, or 8.0 g of REGN-COV2 and were prospectively characterized at baseline for endogenous immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (serum antibody–positive or serum antibody–negative). Key end points included the time-weighted average change in viral load from baseline (day 1) through day 7 and the percentage of patients with at least one Covid-19–related medically attended visit through day 29. Safety was assessed in all patients. Results Data from 275 patients are reported. The least-squares mean difference (combined REGN-COV2 dose groups vs. placebo group) in the time-weighted average change in viral load from day 1 through day 7 was −0.56 log10 copies per milliliter (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.02 to −0.11) among patients who were serum antibody–negative at baseline and −0.41 log10 copies per milliliter (95% CI, −0.71 to −0.10) in the overall trial population. In the overall trial population, 6% of the patients in the placebo group and 3% of the patients in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups reported at least one medically attended visit; among patients who were serum antibody–negative at baseline, the corresponding percentages were 15% and 6% (difference, −9 percentage points; 95% CI, −29 to 11). The percentages of patients with hypersensitivity reactions, infusion-related reactions, and other adverse events were similar in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups and the placebo group. Conclusions In this interim analysis, the REGN-COV2 antibody cocktail reduced viral load, with a greater effect in patients whose immune response had not yet been initiated or who had a high viral load at baseline. Safety outcomes were similar in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups and the placebo group. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and the Biomedical and Advanced Research and Development Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04425629.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with Covid-19

            Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), which is most frequently mild yet can be severe and life-threatening. Virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are predicted to reduce viral load, ameliorate symptoms, and prevent hospitalization. Methods In this ongoing phase 2 trial involving outpatients with recently diagnosed mild or moderate Covid-19, we randomly assigned 452 patients to receive a single intravenous infusion of neutralizing antibody LY-CoV555 in one of three doses (700 mg, 2800 mg, or 7000 mg) or placebo and evaluated the quantitative virologic end points and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the viral load at day 11. The results of a preplanned interim analysis as of September 5, 2020, are reported here. Results At the time of the interim analysis, the observed mean decrease from baseline in the log viral load for the entire population was −3.81, for an elimination of more than 99.97% of viral RNA. For patients who received the 2800-mg dose of LY-CoV555, the difference from placebo in the decrease from baseline was −0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.98 to −0.08; P=0.02), for a viral load that was lower by a factor of 3.4. Smaller differences from placebo in the change from baseline were observed among the patients who received the 700-mg dose (−0.20; 95% CI, −0.66 to 0.25; P=0.38) or the 7000-mg dose (0.09; 95% CI, −0.37 to 0.55; P=0.70). On days 2 to 6, the patients who received LY-CoV555 had a slightly lower severity of symptoms than those who received placebo. The percentage of patients who had a Covid-19–related hospitalization or visit to an emergency department was 1.6% in the LY-CoV555 group and 6.3% in the placebo group. Conclusions In this interim analysis of a phase 2 trial, one of three doses of neutralizing antibody LY-CoV555 appeared to accelerate the natural decline in viral load over time, whereas the other doses had not by day 11. (Funded by Eli Lilly; BLAZE-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04427501.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Antibody Response to 2-Dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Series in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dimitrios.farmakiotis@lifespan.org
                Journal
                Am J Transplant
                Am J Transplant
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-6143
                AJT
                American Journal of Transplantation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1600-6135
                1600-6143
                30 September 2021
                30 September 2021
                : 10.1111/ajt.16843
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
                [ 2 ] Internal Medicine Residency Program The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dimitrios Farmakiotis, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

                Email: dimitrios.farmakiotis@ 123456lifespan.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-108X
                Article
                AJT16843
                10.1111/ajt.16843
                8652993
                34591350
                ddcc1917-c152-4824-b9e8-d1ecacd79d7d
                © 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 15 August 2021
                : 14 June 2021
                : 09 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 6, Words: 11337
                Categories
                Brief Communication
                Brief Communications
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:08.12.2021

                Transplantation
                health services and outcomes research,infection and infectious agents—viral,infectious disease,kidney transplantation/nephrology,patient survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content107

                Cited by23

                Most referenced authors417