Searching for effective components of cognitive rehabilitation for children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A systematic review

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

<p class="first" id="d3459429e142">Cognitive rehabilitation is of interest after paediatric acquired brain injury (ABI). The present systematic review examined studies investigating cognitive rehabilitation interventions for children with ABI, while focusing on identifying effective components. Components were categorized as (1) metacognition and/or strategy use, (2) (computerized) drill-based exercises, and (3) external aids. </p>

Related collections

Most cited references 74

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff … (2009)

0 comments Cited 8419 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff … (2009)

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement-a reporting guideline published in 1999-there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (www.prisma-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

0 comments Cited 1072 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs

John Concato, Nirav Shah, Ralph I Horwitz (2000)

New England Journal of Medicine, 342(25), 1887-1892

0 comments Cited 641 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Christine Resch: (View ORCID Profile)

Petra Hurks: (View ORCID Profile)

Caroline van Heugten: (View ORCID Profile)

Journal

Title: Brain Injury

Abbreviated Title: Brain Injury

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

ISSN (Print): 0269-9052

ISSN (Electronic): 1362-301X

Publication date Created: May 12 2018

Publication date (Electronic): April 05 2018

Publication date (Print): May 12 2018

Volume: 32

Issue: 6

Pages: 679-692

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

[2 ] Limburg Brain Injury Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

[3 ] Sophia Rehabilitation, The Hague, The Netherlands

[4 ] Department of Complex Behavioral Disorders and Forensic Psychiatry, De Bascule, Academic Center for Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

[5 ] Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

[6 ] The Hague University of Applied Sciences, the Hague, The Netherlands

[7 ] School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Article

DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1458335

PubMed ID: 29621405

SO-VID: ddacb7ab-e2fa-4bc2-849b-2fbbad339c19

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Searching for effective components of cognitive rehabilitation for children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A systematic review

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

Most cited references 74

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs

Author and article information

Contributors

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 1,424

Cited by 21

Most referenced authors 1,461