Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of the PARAMEDIC2 trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          PARAMEDIC2 was a medicines trial comparing adrenaline with placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). At the time, United Kingdom (UK) Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) were inexperienced in delivering such research.

          Aim

          To identify barriers and facilitators to delivery of the PARAMEDIC2 (Adrenaline) trial by five UK NHS EMS.

          Methods

          This qualitative study took a grounded theory approach to thematic analysis of workshop data. Members of the trial teams from each service attended a workshop in November 2018 and discussed their experiences in answer to two prompt questions. Data were coded and themes presented.

          Results

          Three main themes were identified: professionalism, organisational investment and unique features of EMS. The study provided an opportunity for recruiting paramedics and research paramedics to demonstrate their professionalism. Research paramedics felt it was part of their professional duty to initiate discussions with the patient/family regarding the trial rather than leave this task to the hospital teams as would usually happen. Organisational investment was reflected by prioritising trial training and further development of research paramedics. By these means, research culture was developed. The unique features of EMS such as geographical challenges were often addressed with technological solutions and through building relationships with internal teams.

          Conclusion

          Barriers to trial delivery included infrequent exposure to the condition of interest and lack of continuity in research paramedic roles. Facilitators identified included flexibility of the research protocol, and organisational investment in the development of research paramedics.

          Participating in PARAMEDIC2 was challenging for the EMS involved, but ultimately strengthened their research culture.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction

          Background Health systems worldwide are facing shortages in health professional workforce. Several studies have demonstrated the direct correlation between the availability of health workers, coverage of health services, and population health outcomes. To address this shortage, online eLearning is increasingly being adopted in health professionals’ education. To inform policy–making, in online eLearning, we need to determine its effectiveness. Methods We performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of online eLearning through a comprehensive search of the major databases for randomised controlled trials that compared online eLearning to traditional learning or alternative learning methods. The search period was from January 2000 to August 2013. We included articles which primarily focused on students' knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes toward eLearning and cost-effectiveness and adverse effects as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Due to significant heterogeneity among the included studies, we presented our results as a narrative synthesis. Findings Fifty–nine studies, including 6750 students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, nursing, physical therapy and pharmacy studies, met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of the 50 studies testing knowledge gains found significantly higher gains in the online eLearning intervention groups compared to traditional learning, whereas 27 did not detect significant differences or found mixed results. Eleven studies did not test for differences. Six studies detected significantly higher skill gains in the online eLearning intervention groups, whilst 3 other studies testing skill gains did not detect differences between groups and 1 study showed mixed results. Twelve studies tested students' attitudes, of which 8 studies showed no differences in attitudes or preferences for online eLearning. Students' satisfaction was measured in 29 studies, 4 studies showed higher satisfaction for online eLearning and 20 studies showed no difference in satisfaction between online eLearning and traditional learning. Risk of bias was high for several of the included studies. Conclusion The current evidence base suggests that online eLearning is equivalent, possibly superior to traditional learning. These findings present a potential incentive for policy makers to cautiously encourage its adoption, while respecting the heterogeneity among the studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.

            Mechanical chest compression devices have the potential to help maintain high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but despite their increasing use, little evidence exists for their effectiveness. We aimed to study whether the introduction of LUCAS-2 mechanical CPR into front-line emergency response vehicles would improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a Strategy of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Tracheal Intubation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest on Functional Outcome

              The optimal approach to airway management during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Resusc Plus
                Resusc Plus
                Resuscitation Plus
                Elsevier
                2666-5204
                27 March 2024
                June 2024
                27 March 2024
                : 18
                : 100617
                Affiliations
                [a ]South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, UK
                [b ]Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, UK
                [c ]Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, UK
                [d ]West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
                [e ]North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, UK
                [f ]London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. Helen.pocock@ 123456scas.nhs.uk
                Article
                S2666-5204(24)00068-7 100617
                10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100617
                11184479
                38894855
                dda1522f-c225-4d74-89f3-07b13519070b
                © 2024 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Clinical Paper

                out-of-hospital cardiac arrest,randomised controlled trial,cardiopulmonary resuscitation,methodology,trial design

                Comments

                Comment on this article