7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CD4 T Cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Schistosoma mansoni Co-infected Individuals Maintain Functional TH1 Responses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is a serious public health concern, infecting a quarter of the world and leading to 10 million cases of tuberculosis (TB) disease and 1. 5 million deaths annually. An effective type 1 CD4 T cell (TH1) immune response is necessary to control Mtb infection and defining factors that modulate Mtb-specific TH1 immunity is important to better define immune correlates of protection in Mtb infection. Helminths stimulate type 2 (TH2) immune responses, which antagonize TH1 cells. As such, we sought to evaluate whether co-infection with the parasitic helminth Schistosoma mansoni (SM) modifies CD4 T cell lineage profiles in a cohort of HIV-uninfected adults in Kisumu, Kenya. Individuals were categorized into six groups by Mtb and SM infection status: healthy controls (HC), latent Mtb infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB), with or without concomitant SM infection. We utilized flow cytometry to evaluate the TH1/TH2 functional and phenotypic lineage state of total CD4 T cells, as well as CD4 T cells specific for the Mtb antigens CFP-10 and ESAT-6. Total CD4 T cell lineage profiles were similar between SM + and SM individuals in all Mtb infection groups. Furthermore, in both LTBI and TB groups, SM infection did not impair Mtb-specific TH1 cytokine production. In fact, SM + LTBI individuals had higher frequencies of IFNγ + Mtb-specific CD4 T cells than SM LTBI individuals. Mtb-specific CD4 T cells were characterized by expression of both classical TH1 markers, CXCR3 and T-bet, and TH2 markers, CCR4, and GATA3. The expression of these markers was similar between SM + and SM individuals with LTBI. However, SM + individuals with active TB had significantly higher frequencies of GATA3 + CCR4 + TH1 cytokine + Mtb-specific CD4 T cells, compared with SM TB individuals. Together, these data indicate that Mtb-specific TH1 cytokine production capacity is maintained in SM-infected individuals, and that Mtb-specific TH1 cytokine + CD4 T cells can express both TH1 and TH2 markers. In high pathogen burden settings where co-infection is common and reoccurring, plasticity of antigen-specific CD4 T cell responses may be important in preserving Mtb-specific TH1 responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immune regulation by helminth parasites: cellular and molecular mechanisms.

          Immunology was founded by studying the body's response to infectious microorganisms, and yet microbial prokaryotes only tell half the story of the immune system. Eukaryotic pathogens--protozoa, helminths, fungi and ectoparasites--have all been powerful selective forces for immune evolution. Often, as with lethal protozoal parasites, the focus has been on acute infections and the inflammatory responses they evoke. Long-lived parasites such as the helminths, however, are more remarkable for their ability to downregulate host immunity, protecting themselves from elimination and minimizing severe pathology in the host.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Flexible Programs of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Human Polarized T Helper 1 and 2 Lymphocytes

            Chemokines and their receptors are important elements for the selective attraction of various subsets of leukocytes. To better understand the selective migration of functional subsets of T cells, chemokine receptor expression was analyzed using monoclonal antibodies, RNase protection assays, and the response to distinct chemokines. Naive T cells expressed only CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)4, whereas the majority of memory/activated T cells expressed CXCR3, and a small proportion expressed CC chemokine receptor (CCR)3 and CCR5. When polarized T cell lines were analyzed, CXCR3 was found to be expressed at high levels on T helper cell (Th)0s and Th1s and at low levels on Th2s. In contrast, CCR3 and CCR4 were found on Th2s. This was confirmed by functional responses: only Th2s responded with an increase in [Ca2+]i to the CCR3 and CCR4 agonists eotaxin and thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC), whereas only Th0s and Th1s responded to low concentrations of the CXCR3 agonists IFN-γ–inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig). Although CCR5 was expressed on both Th1 and Th2 lines, it was absent in several Th2 clones and its expression was markedly influenced by interleukin 2. Chemokine receptor expression and association with Th1 and Th2 phenotypes was affected by other cytokines present during polarization. Transforming growth factor β inhibited CCR3, but enhanced CCR4 and CCR7 expression, whereas interferon α inhibited CCR3 but upregulated CXCR3 and CCR1. These results demonstrate that chemokine receptors are markers of naive and polarized T cell subsets and suggest that flexible programs of chemokine receptor gene expression may control tissue-specific migration of effector T cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effector T cell plasticity: flexibility in the face of changing circumstances.

              As more states of CD4 T cell differentiation are uncovered, their flexibility is also beginning to be recognized. Components that control the plasticity of CD4 T cell populations include cellular conditions, clonality, transcriptional circuitry and chromatin modifications. Appearance of cellular flexibility may arise from truly flexible genetic programs or, alternatively, from heterogeneous populations. New tools will be needed to define the rules that allow or prohibit cellular transitions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                07 February 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 127
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [2] 2Center for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute , Kisumu, Kenya
                [3] 3Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [4] 4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Christoph Hölscher, Research Center Borstel (LG), Germany

                Reviewed by: Manuel Ritter, University Hospital Bonn, Germany; Subash Babu, International Centers for Excellence in Research (NIH), India

                *Correspondence: Cheryl L. Day cday@ 123456emory.edu

                This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2020.00127
                7020828
                32117277
                dd6bdf9c-9a40-42e6-aa62-96755b7c261c
                Copyright © 2020 McLaughlin, Khayumbi, Ongalo, Tonui, Campbell, Allana, Gurrion Ouma, Odhiambo, Gandhi and Day.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 November 2019
                : 17 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 69, Pages: 17, Words: 11737
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 10.13039/100000060
                Award ID: R01AI111948
                Award ID: U19AI111211
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research

                Immunology
                helminth,schistosoma mansoni,mycobacterium tuberculosis,ltbi,active tb disease,cd4 t cell,th1,th2
                Immunology
                helminth, schistosoma mansoni, mycobacterium tuberculosis, ltbi, active tb disease, cd4 t cell, th1, th2

                Comments

                Comment on this article