13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate plays a role in the activation and subcellular localization of mechanistic target of rapamycin 1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We report here that phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate is required for the full activation and localization of mTORC1 by insulin and amino acids, due to the direct interaction of the lipid with the Raptor subunit, which permits efficient activation by GTPases.

          Abstract

          The kinase complex mechanistic target of rapamycin 1 (mTORC1) plays an important role in controlling growth and metabolism. We report here that the stepwise formation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) and phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PI(3,5)P 2) regulates the cell type–specific activation and localization of mTORC1. PI(3)P formation depends on the class II phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) PI3K-C2α, as well as the class III PI3K Vps34, while PI(3,5)P 2 requires the phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate-5-kinase PIKFYVE. In this paper, we show that PIKFYVE and PI3K-C2α are necessary for activation of mTORC1 and its translocation to the plasma membrane in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Furthermore, the mTORC1 component Raptor directly interacts with PI(3,5)P 2. Together these results suggest that PI(3,5)P 2 is an essential mTORC1 regulator that defines the localization of the complex.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Vam6 GEF controls TORC1 by activating the EGO complex.

          The target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) is a central regulator of eukaryotic cell growth that is activated by a variety of hormones (e.g., insulin) and nutrients (e.g., amino acids) and is deregulated in various cancers. Here, we report that the yeast Rag GTPase homolog Gtr1, a component of the vacuolar-membrane-associated EGO complex (EGOC), interacts with and activates TORC1 in an amino-acid-sensitive manner. Expression of a constitutively active (GTP-bound) Gtr1(GTP), which interacted strongly with TORC1, rendered TORC1 partially resistant to leucine deprivation, whereas expression of a growth inhibitory, GDP-bound Gtr1(GDP), caused constitutively low TORC1 activity. We also show that the nucleotide-binding status of Gtr1 is regulated by the conserved guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Vam6. Thus, in addition to its regulatory role in homotypic vacuolar fusion and vacuole protein sorting within the HOPS complex, Vam6 also controls TORC1 function by activating the Gtr1 subunit of the EGO complex.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Svp1p defines a family of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate effectors.

            Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(3,5)P2), made by Fab1p, is essential for vesicle recycling from vacuole/lysosomal compartments and for protein sorting into multivesicular bodies. To isolate PtdIns(3,5)P2 effectors, we identified Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants that display fab1delta-like vacuole enlargement, one of which lacked the SVP1/YFR021w/ATG18 gene. Expressed Svp1p displays PtdIns(3,5)P2 binding of exquisite specificity, GFP-Svp1p localises to the vacuole membrane in a Fab1p-dependent manner, and svp1delta cells fail to recycle a marker protein from the vacuole to the Golgi. Cells lacking Svp1p accumulate abnormally large amounts of PtdIns(3,5)P2. These observations identify Svp1p as a PtdIns(3,5)P2 effector required for PtdIns(3,5)P2-dependent membrane recycling from the vacuole. Other Svp1p-related proteins, including human and Drosophila homologues, bind PtdIns(3,5)P2 similarly. Svp1p and related proteins almost certainly fold as beta-propellers, and the PtdIns(3,5)P2-binding site is on the beta-propeller. It is likely that many of the Svp1p-related proteins that are ubiquitous throughout the eukaryotes are PtdIns(3,5)P2 effectors. Svp1p is not involved in the contributions of FAB1/PtdIns(3,5)P2 to MVB sorting or to vacuole acidification and so additional PtdIns(3,5)P2 effectors must exist.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              TORC2 plasma membrane localization is essential for cell viability and restricted to a distinct domain.

              The conserved target of rapamycin (TOR) kinases regulate many aspects of cellular physiology. They exist in two distinct complexes, termed TOR complex 1 (TORC1) and TOR complex 2 (TORC2), that posses both overlapping and distinct components. TORC1 and TORC2 respond differently to the drug rapamycin and have different cellular functions: whereas the rapamycin-sensitive TORC1 controls many aspects of cell growth and has been characterized in great detail, the TOR complex 2 is less understood and regulates actin polymerization, cell polarity, and ceramide metabolism. How signaling specificity and discrimination between different input signals for the two kinase complexes is achieved is not understood. Here, we show that TORC1 and TORC2 have different localizations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. TORC1 is localized exclusively to the vacuolar membrane, whereas TORC2 is localized dynamically in a previously unrecognized plasma membrane domain, which we term membrane compartment containing TORC2 (MCT). We find that plasma membrane localization of TORC2 is essential for viability and mediated by lipid binding of the C-terminal domain of the Avo1 subunit. From these data, we suggest that the TOR complexes are spatially separated to determine downstream signaling specificity and their responsiveness to different inputs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Cell
                Mol. Biol. Cell
                molbiolcell
                mbc
                Mol. Bio. Cell
                Molecular Biology of the Cell
                The American Society for Cell Biology
                1059-1524
                1939-4586
                01 August 2012
                : 23
                : 15
                : 2955-2962
                Affiliations
                [1] aLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
                [2] dDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
                [3] bDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
                [4] cDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
                Duke University
                Author notes
                1Address correspondence to: Alan R. Saltiel ( saltiel@ 123456lsi.umich.edu ).
                Article
                E11-12-1034
                10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1034
                3408421
                22696681
                dd5df8af-474c-4758-ac3c-19480156ad2f
                © 2012 Bridges et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

                “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell BD; are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell Biology.

                History
                : 21 December 2011
                : 05 June 2012
                : 07 June 2012
                Categories
                Articles
                Signaling

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article