15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Primary Health Care Nurses’ Experiences of Consultations With Internet-Informed Patients: Qualitative Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Most people in modern societies now use the Internet to obtain health-related information. By giving patients knowledge, digital health information is considered to increase patient involvement and patient-centered interactions in health care. However, concerns are raised about the varying quality of health-related websites and low health literacy in the population. There is a gap in the current knowledge of nurses’ experiences with Internet-informed patients.

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to explore primary health care nurses’ experiences of consultations with patients who present health-related information from the Internet.

          Methods

          This is a qualitative study based on interviews with 9 primary health care nurses. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results are reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines.

          Results

          The phenomenon of Internet-informed patients was considered to change the usual rules in health care, affecting attributes and actions of patients, patterns of interactions in consultations, and roles of nurses and patients. Three categories were identified: (1) Facing the downsides of Googling, (2) Patients as main actors, and (3) Nurse role challenged. Although the benefits of health-related Internet information were described, its negative consequences were emphasized overall. The problems were mainly ascribed to inaccurate Internet information and patients’ inability to effectively manage the information.

          Conclusions

          Our study suggests ambivalent attitudes among nurses toward health-related Internet information. In order to promote equitable care in the digital era, increased awareness in health care about useful strategies for overcoming the difficulties and embracing the benefits of conferring with Internet-informed patients seems to be a legitimate goal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

              Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.'s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Nurs
                JMIR Nurs
                JNI
                JMIR Nursing
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2562-7600
                Jan-Dec 2019
                30 July 2019
                : 2
                : 1
                : e14194
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Nursing Umeå University Umeå Sweden
                [2 ] Arctic Research Centre Umeå University Umeå Sweden
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Anna E Sjöström anna.e.sjostrom@ 123456umu.se
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6766-2234
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-6512
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-8269
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-0014
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-4599
                Article
                v2i1e14194
                10.2196/14194
                8279453
                34345770
                dd5486d6-10f1-4740-90d1-5db9d4ada5ff
                ©Anna E Sjöström, Åsa Hörnsten, Senada Hajdarevic, Agneta Emmoth, Ulf Isaksson. Originally published in JMIR Nursing Informatics (https://nursing.jmir.org), 30.07.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 29 March 2019
                : 15 May 2019
                : 21 May 2019
                : 19 June 2019
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                ehealth,internet,consumer health information,health literacy,patient-centered care,qualitative research,primary health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article