9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community Health Worker Program Outcomes for Diabetes and Hypertension Control in West Bank Refugee Camps: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A community health worker program in urban Palestinian West Bank refugee camps improves diabetes and hypertension control in a setting of chronic violence and extreme adversity.

          Abstract

          Key Findings

          • Health for Palestine (H4P) was established in 2018 as a refugee-run community health worker program in the occupied West Bank to provide social accompaniment, address health barriers, and initiate monitoring and support for chronic disease patients.

          • A study from 2 Palestinian refugee camps indicates that accompaniment-based community health worker programs are feasible and effective in improving diabetes and hypertension control in camps experiencing chronic violence under military occupation.

          Key Implications

          • Stakeholders providing health care to refugees in Palestine and the diaspora can consider expanding an intensive community-run health model to other camps and communities experiencing extreme adversity as a result of occupation, dispossession, and violence.

          • Given the rapidly increasing rise in migration globally, community health programs like H4P could play a key role in mitigating health barriers and maximizing community agency in similar contexts of extreme adversity. Policy makers should consider the multimodal benefits of integrating such programs into broader health programming.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction:

          Community health worker (CHW) programs have proven effective in improving diabetes control in many locations and settings, but data on feasibility and efficacy are lacking in the Middle East and settings of chronic violence. A Palestinian CHW program, Health for Palestine (H4P), addresses chronic diseases in West Bank refugee camps. Our study assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of the program’s diabetes and hypertension interventions.

          Methods:

          Data on home visits, patient retention, and blood pressure were extracted from the CHW records and analyzed. To assess diabetic patient progress, we conducted a retrospective matched cohort study using data obtained from a United Nations (UN) clinical database to analyze the trajectory of hemoglobin A1c (A1c) values. Thirty of the 47 diabetic patients in the H4P CHW program met study inclusion criteria and were each matched with 3 patients from the Bethlehem UN clinic (n=120). We tested for significance using multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors.

          Results:

          The average number of home visits per patient per month was 7.3 (standard deviation=4.1), and the patient retention rate was 100% over an average of 11.2 months. For hypertension patients in the CHW program (n=33), mean systolic blood pressure decreased by 7.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.93, 12.25; P=.009) and mean diastolic blood pressure by 4.3 mmHg (95% CI=0.80, 7.91; P=.018) from March 2018 to November 2019. On average, diabetic patients within the CHW group experienced a 1.4 point greater decline in A1c per year compared to those in the non-CHW group, after adjusting for potential confounders (95% CI=−0.66, −2.1; P<.001).

          Discussion:

          The results suggest that CHW accompaniment may be an effective model for improving diabetes and hypertension control in refugee camps experiencing direct violence and extreme adversity. A low exclusion cut-off for A1c (≤6.4%) may underestimate the program’s impact.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.

          To determine the relation between exposure to glycaemia over time and the risk of macrovascular or microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prospective observational study. 23 hospital based clinics in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. 4585 white, Asian Indian, and Afro-Caribbean UKPDS patients, whether randomised or not to treatment, were included in analyses of incidence; of these, 3642 were included in analyses of relative risk. Primary predefined aggregate clinical outcomes: any end point or deaths related to diabetes and all cause mortality. Secondary aggregate outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation (including death from peripheral vascular disease), and microvascular disease (predominantly retinal photo-coagulation). Single end points: non-fatal heart failure and cataract extraction. Risk reduction associated with a 1% reduction in updated mean HbA(1c) adjusted for possible confounders at diagnosis of diabetes. The incidence of clinical complications was significantly associated with glycaemia. Each 1% reduction in updated mean HbA(1c) was associated with reductions in risk of 21% for any end point related to diabetes (95% confidence interval 17% to 24%, P<0.0001), 21% for deaths related to diabetes (15% to 27%, P<0.0001), 14% for myocardial infarction (8% to 21%, P<0.0001), and 37% for microvascular complications (33% to 41%, P<0.0001). No threshold of risk was observed for any end point. In patients with type 2 diabetes the risk of diabetic complications was strongly associated with previous hyperglycaemia. Any reduction in HbA(1c) is likely to reduce the risk of complications, with the lowest risk being in those with HbA(1c) values in the normal range (<6.0%).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Syndemics and the biosocial conception of health.

            The syndemics model of health focuses on the biosocial complex, which consists of interacting, co-present, or sequential diseases and the social and environmental factors that promote and enhance the negative effects of disease interaction. This emergent approach to health conception and clinical practice reconfigures conventional historical understanding of diseases as distinct entities in nature, separate from other diseases and independent of the social contexts in which they are found. Rather, all of these factors tend to interact synergistically in various and consequential ways, having a substantial impact on the health of individuals and whole populations. Specifically, a syndemics approach examines why certain diseases cluster (ie, multiple diseases affecting individuals and groups); the pathways through which they interact biologically in individuals and within populations, and thereby multiply their overall disease burden, and the ways in which social environments, especially conditions of social inequality and injustice, contribute to disease clustering and interaction as well as to vulnerability. In this Series, the contributions of the syndemics approach for understanding both interacting chronic diseases in social context, and the implications of a syndemics orientation to the issue of health rights, are examined.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Non-communicable disease syndemics: poverty, depression, and diabetes among low-income populations.

              The co-occurrence of health burdens in transitioning populations, particularly in specific socioeconomic and cultural contexts, calls for conceptual frameworks to improve understanding of risk factors, so as to better design and implement prevention and intervention programmes to address comorbidities. The concept of a syndemic, developed by medical anthropologists, provides such a framework for preventing and treating comorbidities. The term syndemic refers to synergistic health problems that affect the health of a population within the context of persistent social and economic inequalities. Until now, syndemic theory has been applied to comorbid health problems in poor immigrant communities in high-income countries with limited translation, and in low-income or middle-income countries. In this Series paper, we examine the application of syndemic theory to comorbidities and multimorbidities in low-income and middle-income countries. We employ diabetes as an exemplar and discuss its comorbidity with HIV in Kenya, tuberculosis in India, and depression in South Africa. Using a model of syndemics that addresses transactional pathophysiology, socioeconomic conditions, health system structures, and cultural context, we illustrate the different syndemics across these countries and the potential benefit of syndemic care to patients. We conclude with recommendations for research and systems of care to address syndemics in low-income and middle-income country settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Health Sci Pract
                Glob Health Sci Pract
                ghsp
                ghsp
                Global Health: Science and Practice
                Global Health: Science and Practice
                2169-575X
                31 October 2022
                31 October 2022
                : 10
                : 5
                : e2200168
                Affiliations
                [a ]Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.
                [b ]Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University , Cambridge, MA, USA.
                [c ]University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
                [d ]New York-Presbyterian Hospital , Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
                [e ]United Nations Relief and Works Agency , Arroub refugee camp, occupied Palestinian territory.
                [f ]Makassad Hospital , East Jerusalem, occupied Palestinian territory.
                [g ]University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
                [h ]United Nations Relief and Works Agency , Amman, Jordan.
                [i ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Bram Wispelwey ( bwispelwey@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu ).
                Article
                GHSP-D-22-00168
                10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00168
                9622278
                36316145
                dd3b847d-27de-42fc-96f5-145bb7c81634
                © Rimawi et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00168

                History
                : 20 April 2022
                : 13 September 2022
                Categories
                Original Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article