24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in adult: A narrative review on the surgical techniques and contemporary outcomes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the rapid increase in the use of robotic surgery in urology, the majority of ureteric reconstruction procedures are still performed using laparoscopic or open approaches. This is primarily due to uncertainty regarding the advantages of robotic approaches over conventional ones, and the unique difficulty in identifying the specific area of interest due to the lack of tactile feedback from the current robotic systems. However, with the potential benefits of minimal invasiveness, several pioneering reports have been published on robotic surgery in urology. By reviewing the literature on this topic, we aimed to summarize the techniques, considerations, and consistent findings regarding robotic ureteral reconstruction in adults. Robotic applications for ureteral surgery have been primarily reported for pediatric urology, especially in the context of relieving a congenital obstruction in the ureteral pelvic junction. However, contemporary studies have also consistently demonstrated that robotic surgery could be a reliable option for malignant, iatrogenic, and traumatic conditions, which generally occur in adult patients. Nevertheless, the lack of comparative studies on heterogeneous hosts and disease conditions make it difficult to determine the benefit of the robotic approach over the conventional approach in the general population; thus, qualified prospective trials are needed for wider acceptance. However, contemporary reports have demonstrated that the robotic approach could be an alternative option for ureteral construction, even in the absence of haptic feedback, which can be compensated by various surgical techniques and enhanced three-dimensional visualization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update

          The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

            There is an ongoing debate about the factors that influence intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephrouretectomy (RNU) to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of indocyanine green during robot-assisted ureteral reconstructions.

              Although there are reports of robot-assisted ureteral reconstructions (RURs) with excellent safety and efficacy, the procedures remain technically challenging. In the robotic setting the surgeon must rely on visual cues in the absence of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a dye that can be visualized under near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Asian J Urol
                Asian J Urol
                Asian Journal of Urology
                Second Military Medical University
                2214-3882
                2214-3890
                05 November 2020
                January 2021
                05 November 2020
                : 8
                : 1
                : 38-49
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
                [b ]Department of Urology, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Seetharam_bhat2003@ 123456yahoo.co.in
                Article
                S2214-3882(20)30080-1
                10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.001
                7859418
                33569271
                dce06589-95f3-4444-98c9-c0773abef79e
                © 2021 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 December 2019
                : 30 March 2020
                : 20 July 2020
                Categories
                Review

                robotic reconstructive surgery,ureteric reconstruction,surgical techniques,robotic pyeloplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article