18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Soil biodiversity plays a key role in regulating the processes that underpin the delivery of ecosystem goods and services in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural intensification is known to change the diversity of individual groups of soil biota, but less is known about how intensification affects biodiversity of the soil food web as a whole, and whether or not these effects may be generalized across regions. We examined biodiversity in soil food webs from grasslands, extensive, and intensive rotations in four agricultural regions across Europe: in Sweden, the UK, the Czech Republic and Greece. Effects of land-use intensity were quantified based on structure and diversity among functional groups in the soil food web, as well as on community-weighted mean body mass of soil fauna. We also elucidate land-use intensity effects on diversity of taxonomic units within taxonomic groups of soil fauna. We found that between regions soil food web diversity measures were variable, but that increasing land-use intensity caused highly consistent responses. In particular, land-use intensification reduced the complexity in the soil food webs, as well as the community-weighted mean body mass of soil fauna. In all regions across Europe, species richness of earthworms, Collembolans, and oribatid mites was negatively affected by increased land-use intensity. The taxonomic distinctness, which is a measure of taxonomic relatedness of species in a community that is independent of species richness, was also reduced by land-use intensification. We conclude that intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity, making soil food webs less diverse and composed of smaller bodied organisms. Land-use intensification results in fewer functional groups of soil biota with fewer and taxonomically more closely related species. We discuss how these changes in soil biodiversity due to land-use intensification may threaten the functioning of soil in agricultural production systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality.

          Biodiversity loss has become a global concern as evidence accumulates that it will negatively affect ecosystem services on which society depends. So far, most studies have focused on the ecological consequences of above-ground biodiversity loss; yet a large part of Earth's biodiversity is literally hidden below ground. Whether reductions of biodiversity in soil communities below ground have consequences for the overall performance of an ecosystem remains unresolved. It is important to investigate this in view of recent observations that soil biodiversity is declining and that soil communities are changing upon land use intensification. We established soil communities differing in composition and diversity and tested their impact on eight ecosystem functions in model grassland communities. We show that soil biodiversity loss and simplification of soil community composition impair multiple ecosystem functions, including plant diversity, decomposition, nutrient retention, and nutrient cycling. The average response of all measured ecosystem functions (ecosystem multifunctionality) exhibited a strong positive linear relationship to indicators of soil biodiversity, suggesting that soil community composition is a key factor in regulating ecosystem functioning. Our results indicate that changes in soil communities and the loss of soil biodiversity threaten ecosystem multifunctionality and sustainability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diversity meets decomposition.

            Over 100 gigatons of terrestrial plant biomass are produced globally each year. Ninety percent of this biomass escapes herbivory and enters the dead organic matter pool, thus supporting complex detritus-based food webs that determine the critical balance between carbon mineralization and sequestration. How will changes in biodiversity affect this vital component of ecosystem functioning? Based on our analysis of concepts and experiments of leaf decomposition in forest floors and streams, we suggest that changes in species diversity within and across trophic levels can significantly alter decomposition. This happens through various mechanisms that are broadly similar in forest floors and streams. Differences in diversity effects between these systems relate to divergent habitat conditions and evolutionary trajectories of aquatic and terrestrial decomposers. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs.

              Global conversion of natural habitats to agriculture has led to marked changes in species diversity and composition. However, it is less clear how habitat modification affects interactions among species. Networks of feeding interactions (food webs) describe the underlying structure of ecological communities, and might be crucially linked to their stability and function. Here, we analyse 48 quantitative food webs for cavity-nesting bees, wasps and their parasitoids across five tropical habitat types. We found marked changes in food-web structure across the modification gradient, despite little variation in species richness. The evenness of interaction frequencies declined with habitat modification, with most energy flowing along one or a few pathways in intensively managed agricultural habitats. In modified habitats there was a higher ratio of parasitoid to host species and increased parasitism rates, with implications for the important ecosystem services, such as pollination and biological control, that are performed by host bees and wasps. The most abundant parasitoid species was more specialized in modified habitats, with reduced attack rates on alternative hosts. Conventional community descriptors failed to discriminate adequately among habitats, indicating that perturbation of the structure and function of ecological communities might be overlooked in studies that do not document and quantify species interactions. Altered interaction structure therefore represents an insidious and functionally important hidden effect of habitat modification by humans.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Change Biology
                Glob Change Biol
                Wiley
                13541013
                February 2015
                February 2015
                November 17 2014
                : 21
                : 2
                : 973-985
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ecology; School of Biology; Aristotle University; Thessaloniki 54124 Greece
                [2 ]Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris; iEES-Paris UMR 7618 (CNRS UMPC IRD INRA UPEC); University Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris 75005 France
                [3 ]Biometris; Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Wageningen University; Wageningen 6700 AC The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Terrestrial Ecology; Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW); Wageningen 6700 AB The Netherlands
                [5 ]Laboratory of Nematology; Wageningen University; Wageningen 6700 ES The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Biology; Lund University; Lund SE 22362 Sweden
                [7 ]Faculty of Life Sciences; The University of Manchester; Manchester M13 9PT UK
                [8 ]Department of Economics; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU); Lund S-220 07 Sweden
                [9 ]Department of Biology; Terrestrial Ecology; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen 1353 Denmark
                [10 ]Department of Ecology; Philipps-University; Marburg 35043 Germany
                [11 ]Department of Animal Ecology; Justus Liebig University; Giessen 35392 Germany
                [12 ]Institute of Soil Biology; Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic; Ceske Budejovice 370 05 Czech Republic
                [13 ]Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Helsinki; Lahti FI 15140 Finland
                [14 ]Centre for Agri-Environmental Research; School of Agriculture; Policy & Development; University of Reading; Reading RG6 6AR UK
                [15 ]School of Anthropology and Conservation; The University of Kent; Canterbury Kent CT2 7NR UK
                [16 ]Department of Conservation Biology; Vegetation and Landscape Ecology; University of Vienna; Vienna 1030 Austria
                Article
                10.1111/gcb.12752
                25242445
                dcb7f05e-f4a4-489b-a2d9-d71579a9c6e2
                © 2014

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article