9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetic diversity and resilience in benthic marine populations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Background Understanding the mechanisms behind resilience has become more relevant in the last decades, due to the increasing and intensifying disturbances from natural and anthropogenic sources that threaten biodiversity. Evidence from terrestrial populations suggests that resilience increases with genetic diversity. Few studies, however, have evaluated the relationship between genetics and resilience in benthic marine populations. Methods and results For this review, we gathered studies where genetic diversity was the predictor variable, and resilience was the response variable. Twenty-five publications between 2001 and 2018 were included. Thirteen benthic marine species were identified, mainly sea-grass species, among which Zostera marina was the most frequently studied. The relationship between genetic diversity and resilience was variable-dependent. Considering all the analyses (N = 150) in the studies reviewed, 44% reported positive relationships between genetic diversity and resilience capacity. Negative relationships were found in 6%, and no relationship was found in 50%. Positive relationships indicated that genetic diversity increased resistance and recovery capacity after different types of disturbances. Dominance and complementarity were suggested as the underlying mechanism explaining these findings in the few studies that conducted this type of evaluation. Conclusions The results of this review suggest that the relationship between genetic diversity and resilience is mainly positive. However, this relationship relies on how genetic diversity and resiliency were measured, as well as on the biological characteristics of the species under study. This reinforces the importance of acknowledging and maintaining genetic diversity for the conservation of benthic populations in marine ecosystems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

            Understanding the ecological consequences of biodiversity is a fundamental challenge. Research on a key component of biodiversity, genetic diversity, has traditionally focused on its importance in evolutionary processes, but classical studies in evolutionary biology, agronomy and conservation biology indicate that genetic diversity might also have important ecological effects. Our review of the literature reveals significant effects of genetic diversity on ecological processes such as primary productivity, population recovery from disturbance, interspecific competition, community structure, and fluxes of energy and nutrients. Thus, genetic diversity can have important ecological consequences at the population, community and ecosystem levels, and in some cases the effects are comparable in magnitude to the effects of species diversity. However, it is not clear how widely these results apply in nature, as studies to date have been biased towards manipulations of plant clonal diversity, and little is known about the relative importance of genetic diversity vs. other factors that influence ecological processes of interest. Future studies should focus not only on documenting the presence of genetic diversity effects but also on identifying underlying mechanisms and predicting when such effects are likely to occur in nature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

              The impact of biodiversity loss on the functioning of ecosystems and their ability to provide ecological services has become a central issue in ecology. Several experiments have provided evidence that reduced species diversity may impair ecosystem processes such as plant biomass production. The interpretation of these experiments, however, has been controversial because two types of mechanism may operate in combination. In the 'selection effect', dominance by species with particular traits affects ecosystem processes. In the 'complementarity effect', resource partitioning or positive interactions lead to increased total resource use. Here we present a new approach to separate the two effects on the basis of an additive partitioning analogous to the Price equation in evolutionary genetics. Applying this method to data from the pan-European BIODEPTH experiment reveals that the selection effect is zero on average and varies from negative to positive in different localities, depending on whether species with lower- or higher-than-average biomass dominate communities. In contrast, the complementarity effect is positive overall, supporting the hypothesis that plant diversity influences primary production in European grasslands through niche differentiation or facilitation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rchnat
                Revista chilena de historia natural
                Rev. chil. hist. nat.
                Sociedad de Biología de Chile (Santiago, , Chile )
                0716-078X
                2023
                : 96
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1] Concepción Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad de Concepción orgdiv1Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research Chile
                [2] Concepción Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad de Concepción orgdiv1Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas orgdiv2Programa de Doctorado en Sistemática y Biodiversidad Chile
                [3] Concepción Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad de Concepción orgdiv1Departamento de Oceanografía Chile
                [4] Concepción Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción orgdiv1Facultad de Ciencias orgdiv2Departamento de Ecología Chile
                [5] Concepción orgnameLaboratorio de Investigación en Ecosistemas Acuáticos Chile
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-2998
                Article
                S0716-078X2023000100502 S0716-078X(23)09600000502
                10.1186/s40693-023-00117-1
                dc859538-cf98-47f2-bf8c-d67d7da7bebd

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 04 November 2022
                : 06 June 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 56, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Chile

                Categories
                REVIEW

                Recovery,Genetic diversity,Resilience,Resistance,Disturbances

                Comments

                Comment on this article