21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Processed foods: contributions to nutrition

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Both fresh and processed foods make up vital parts of the food supply. Processed food contributes to both food security (ensuring that sufficient food is available) and nutrition security (ensuring that food quality meets human nutrient needs). This ASN scientific statement focuses on one aspect of processed foods: their nutritional impacts. Specifically, this scientific statement 1) provides an introduction to how processed foods contribute to the health of populations, 2) analyzes the contribution of processed foods to “nutrients to encourage” and “constituents to limit” in the American diet as recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 3) identifies the responsibilities of various stakeholders in improving the American diet, and 4) reviews emerging technologies and the research needed for a better understanding of the role of processed foods in a healthy diet. Analyses of the NHANES 2003–2008 show that processed foods provide both nutrients to encourage and constituents to limit as specified in the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Of the nutrients to encourage, processed foods contributed 55% of dietary fiber, 48% of calcium, 43% of potassium, 34% of vitamin D, 64% of iron, 65% of folate, and 46% of vitamin B-12. Of the constituents to limit, processed foods contributed 57% of energy, 52% of saturated fat, 75% of added sugars, and 57% of sodium. Diets are more likely to meet food guidance recommendations if nutrient-dense foods, either processed or not, are selected. Nutrition and food science professionals, the food industry, and other stakeholders can help to improve the diets of Americans by providing a nutritious food supply that is safe, enjoyable, affordable, and sustainable by communicating effectively and accurately with each other and by working together to improve the overall knowledge of consumers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of the nutrient-rich foods index: a tool to measure nutritional quality of foods.

          Ranking and/or classifying foods based on their nutrient composition is known as nutrient profiling. Nutrition quality indices need to be tested and validated against quality of the total diet. A family of nutrient-rich foods (NRF) indices were validated against the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), an accepted measure of diet quality. All foods consumed by participants in NHANES 1999-2002 studies were scored using NRFn.3 (where n = 6-15) indices based on unweighted sums, means, and ratios of percent daily values (DV) for nutrients to encourage (n) and for nutrients to limit (LIM) (3). Individual food scores were calculated based on 100 kcal (418 kJ) and FDA serving sizes [reference amounts customarily consumed (RACC)]. Energy-weighted food-based scores per person were then regressed against HEI, adjusting for gender, age, and ethnicity. The measure of index performance was the percentage of variation in HEI (R2) explained by each NRF score. NRF indices based on both nutrients to encourage and LIM performed better than indices based on LIM only. Maximum variance in HEI was explained using 6 or 9 nutrients to encourage; index performance actually declined with the inclusion of additional vitamins and minerals. NRF indices based on 100 kcal (418 kJ) performed similarly to indices based on RACC. Algorithms based on sums or means of nutrient DV performed better than ratio-based scores. The NRF9.3 index, based on 9 nutrients to encourage and 3 LIM per RACC and per 100 kcal, explained the highest percentage of variation from HEI and could be readily expected to rank foods based on nutrient density.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nanotechnology for the Food and Bioprocessing Industries

            Several complex set of engineering and scientific challenges in the food and bioprocessing industries for manufacturing high quality and safe food through efficient and sustainable means can be solved through nanotechnology. Bacteria identification and food quality monitoring using biosensors; intelligent, active, and smart food packaging systems; and nanoencapsulation of bioactive food compounds are few examples of emerging applications of nanotechnology for the food industry. We review the background about the potential of nanotechnology, provide an overview of the current and future applications of nanotechnology relevant to food and bioprocessing industry, and identify the societal implications for successful implementation of nanotechnology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Feeding the World Today and Tomorrow: The Importance of Food Science and Technology

              by Philip E. Nelson, 2007 World Food Prize Laureate; Professor Emeritus, Food Science Dept., Purdue Univ. Just as society has evolved over time, our food system has also evolved over centuries into a global system of immense size and complexity. The commitment of food science and technology professionals to advancing the science of food, ensuring a safe and abundant food supply, and contributing to healthier people everywhere is integral to that evolution. Food scientists and technologists are versatile, interdisciplinary, and collaborative practitioners in a profession at the crossroads of scientific and technological developments. As the food system has drastically changed, from one centered around family food production on individual farms and home food preservation to the modern system of today, most people are not connected to their food nor are they familiar with agricultural production and food manufacturing designed for better food safety and quality. The Institute of Food Technologists-a nonprofit scientific society of individual members engaged in food science, food technology, and related professions in industry, academia, and government-has the mission to advance the science of food and the long-range vision to ensure a safe and abundant food supply contributing to healthier people everywhere. IFT convened a task force and called on contributing authors to develop this scientific review to inform the general public about the importance and benefits of food science and technology in IFT's efforts to feed a growing world. The main objective of this review is to serve as a foundational resource for public outreach and education and to address misperceptions and misinformation about processed foods. The intended audience includes those who desire to know more about the application of science and technology to meet society's food needs and those involved in public education and outreach. It is IFT's hope that the reader will gain a better understanding of the goals or purposes for various applications of science and technology in the food system, and an appreciation for the complexity of the modern food supply. Abstract:  This Institute of Food Technologists scientific review describes the scientific and technological achievements that made possible the modern production-to-consumption food system capable of feeding nearly 7 billion people, and it also discusses the promising potential of ongoing technological advancements to enhance the food supply even further and to increase the health and wellness of the growing global population. This review begins with a historical perspective that summarizes the parallel developments of agriculture and food technology, from the beginnings of modern society to the present. A section on food manufacturing explains why food is processed and details various food processing methods that ensure food safety and preserve the quality of products. A section about potential solutions to future challenges briefly discusses ways in which scientists, the food industry, and policy makers are striving to improve the food supply for a healthier population and feed the future. Applications of science and technology within the food system have allowed production of foods in adequate quantities to meet the needs of society, as it has evolved. Today, our production-to-consumption food system is complex, and our food is largely safe, tasty, nutritious, abundant, diverse, convenient, and less costly and more readily accessible than ever before. Scientific and technological advancements must be accelerated and applied in developed and developing nations alike, if we are to feed a growing world population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Clin Nutr
                Am. J. Clin. Nutr
                ajcn
                The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
                Oxford University Press
                0002-9165
                1938-3207
                June 2014
                23 April 2014
                : 99
                : 6
                : 1525-1542
                Affiliations
                [3 ]Department of Nutrition Science, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN;
                [4 ]Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, School of Medicine, and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA;
                [5 ]Office of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD;
                [6 ]Nutrition Impact LLC, Battle Creek, MI;
                [7 ]Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, and Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA;
                [8 ]Leveille Associates, Denville, NJ;
                [9 ]Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
                [10 ]Vienna, VA.
                Author notes
                [2]

                Author disclosures: JC King, RS MacDonald, J Ordovas, and D Schnakenberg, no conflicts of interest. CM Weaver, serves as an unpaid board member for the International Life Sciences Institute of North America and serves on a scientific advisory board for Pharmavite and her university has received research grants from the Dairy Research Institute, Nestlé, and Tate & Lyle. J Dwyer, serves as an unpaid board member for the International Life Sciences Institute of North America; serves on scientific advisory boards for ConAgra Foods Inc, McCormick Inc, Bay State Milling, and Nestle; performed speaking engagements for Ocean Spray and the Alliance for Potato Research and Education; and owns stock in ConAgra Foods Inc, McCormick Inc, and Hershey. VL Fulgoni III, performs consulting and database analyses for various food and beverage companies and related entities. GA Leveille, serves on scientific advisory boards for Hillshire Brands and the McCormick Science Institute.

                [* ]Address correspondence to CM Weaver, Department of Nutrition Science, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059. E-mail: weavercm@ 123456purdue.edu .
                Article
                PMC6410904 PMC6410904 6410904 089284
                10.3945/ajcn.114.089284
                6410904
                24760975
                dc60850d-130a-4ffd-9a86-1a45e178aa50
                ) 2014 American Society for Nutrition
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Categories
                From the American Society for Nutrition

                Comments

                Comment on this article