Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study design and protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial using a practical implementation strategy as a model for hypertension-HIV integration — the MAP-IT trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          As people living with HIV (PLWH) experience earlier and more pronounced onset of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), advancing integrated care networks and models in low-resource-high-need settings is critical. Leveraging current health system initiatives and addressing gaps in treatment for PLWH, we report our approach using a late-stage (T4) implementation research study to test the adoption and sustainability of a proven-effective implementation strategy which has been minimally applied in low-resource settings for the integration of hypertension control into HIV treatment. We detail our protocol for the Managing Hypertension Among People Living with HIV: an Integrated Model (MAP-IT) trial, which uses a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of practice facilitation on the adoption of a hypertension treatment program for PLWH receiving care at primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.

          Design

          In partnership with the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) and community organizations, the MAP-IT trial takes place in 30 PHCs. The i-PARiHS framework guided pre-implementation needs assessment. The RE-AIM framework will guide post-implementation activities to evaluate the effect of practice facilitation on the adoption, implementation fidelity, and sustainability of a hypertension program, as well as blood pressure (BP) control. Using a SW-CRT design, PHCs sequentially crossover from the hypertension program only (usual care) to hypertension plus practice facilitation (experimental condition). PHCs will recruit and enroll an average of 28–32 patients to reach a maximum of 960 PLWH participants with uncontrolled hypertension who will be followed longitudinally for BP outcomes.

          Discussion

          Given the need for integrated NCD-HIV care platforms in low-resource settings, MAP-IT will underscore the challenges and opportunities for integrating hypertension treatment into HIV care, particularly concerning adoption and sustainability. The evaluation of our integration approach will also highlight the potential impact of a health systems strengthening approach on BP control among PLWH.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05031819). Registered on 2nd September 2021.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-023-01272-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

          Progress in public health and community-based interventions has been hampered by the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework appropriate to such programs. Multilevel interventions that incorporate policy, environmental, and individual components should be evaluated with measurements suited to their settings, goals, and purpose. In this commentary, the authors propose a model (termed the RE-AIM model) for evaluating public health interventions that assesses 5 dimensions: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. These dimensions occur at multiple levels (e.g., individual, clinic or organization, community) and interact to determine the public health or population-based impact of a program or policy. The authors discuss issues in evaluating each of these dimensions and combining them to determine overall public health impact. Failure to adequately evaluate programs on all 5 dimensions can lead to a waste of resources, discontinuities between stages of research, and failure to improve public health to the limits of our capacity. The authors summarize strengths and limitations of the RE-AIM model and recommend areas for future research and application.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide

            This article provides an overview of recent developments in mediation analysis, that is, analyses used to assess the relative magnitude of different pathways and mechanisms by which an exposure may affect an outcome. Traditional approaches to mediation in the biomedical and social sciences are described. Attention is given to the confounding assumptions required for a causal interpretation of direct and indirect effect estimates. Methods from the causal inference literature to conduct mediation in the presence of exposure-mediator interactions, binary outcomes, binary mediators, and case-control study designs are presented. Sensitivity analysis techniques for unmeasured confounding and measurement error are introduced. Discussion is given to extensions to time-to-event outcomes and multiple mediators. Further flexible modeling strategies arising from the precise counterfactual definitions of direct and indirect effects are also described. The focus throughout is on methodology that is easily implementable in practice across a broad range of potential applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.

              Treatment fidelity refers to the methodological strategies used to monitor and enhance the reliability and validity of behavioral interventions. This article describes a multisite effort by the Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) to identify treatment fidelity concepts and strategies in health behavior intervention research. The work group reviewed treatment fidelity practices in the research literature, identified techniques used within the BCC, and developed recommendations for incorporating these practices more consistently. The recommendations cover study design, provider training, treatment delivery, treatment receipt, and enactment of treatment skills. Funding agencies, reviewers, and journal editors are encouraged to make treatment fidelity a standard part of the conduct and evaluation of health behavior intervention research. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                angela.aifah@nyulangone.org
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                10 May 2023
                10 May 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.137628.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, , New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, ; New York, NY USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.137628.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, Department of Population Health, , New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, ; New York, NY USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.417903.8, ISNI 0000 0004 1783 2217, Cardiovascular Research Unit, , University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, University of Abuja, ; Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria
                [4 ]GRID grid.412960.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9156 2260, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, , University of Uyo, ; Uyo, Akwa Ibom State Nigeria
                [5 ]GRID grid.417903.8, ISNI 0000 0004 1783 2217, Department of Family Medicine, , University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, ; Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria
                [6 ]GRID grid.453035.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0533 8254, Fogarty International Center, NIH, ; Bethesda, USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.4367.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, ; St. Louis, USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.262962.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9342, Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social Justice, , Saint Louis University, ; St. Louis, USA
                [9 ]Akwa Ibom Primary Healthcare Development Board, State Primary Health Care Development Board, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State Nigeria
                [10 ]GRID grid.413003.5, ISNI 0000 0000 8883 6523, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, , University of Abuja, ; Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-8487
                Article
                1272
                10.1186/s13012-023-01272-5
                10173657
                37165382
                dbafacfa-b3ce-4d9d-ba63-873bfca8d4f5
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 March 2023
                : 21 April 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000050, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;
                Award ID: 4UH3HL154498-0
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Medicine
                implementation strategy,integrated models,ncd-hiv care
                Medicine
                implementation strategy, integrated models, ncd-hiv care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content114

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors1,921