6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Harmonization of multi-scanner in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy: ENIGMA consortium task group considerations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is a powerful, non-invasive, quantitative imaging technique that allows for the measurement of brain metabolites that has demonstrated utility in diagnosing and characterizing a broad range of neurological diseases. Its impact, however, has been limited due to small sample sizes and methodological variability in addition to intrinsic limitations of the method itself such as its sensitivity to motion. The lack of standardization from a data acquisition and data processing perspective makes it difficult to pool multiple studies and/or conduct multisite studies that are necessary for supporting clinically relevant findings. Based on the experience of the ENIGMA MRS work group and a review of the literature, this manuscript provides an overview of the current state of MRS data harmonization. Key factors that need to be taken into consideration when conducting both retrospective and prospective studies are described. These include (1) MRS acquisition issues such as pulse sequence, RF and B0 calibrations, echo time, and SNR; (2) data processing issues such as pre-processing steps, modeling, and quantitation; and (3) biological factors such as voxel location, age, sex, and pathology. Various approaches to MRS data harmonization are then described including meta-analysis, mega-analysis, linear modeling, ComBat and artificial intelligence approaches. The goal is to provide both novice and experienced readers with the necessary knowledge for conducting MRS data harmonization studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references173

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

          Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

            Non-biological experimental variation or "batch effects" are commonly observed across multiple batches of microarray experiments, often rendering the task of combining data from these batches difficult. The ability to combine microarray data sets is advantageous to researchers to increase statistical power to detect biological phenomena from studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or in studies that require the sequential hybridization of arrays. In general, it is inappropriate to combine data sets without adjusting for batch effects. Methods have been proposed to filter batch effects from data, but these are often complicated and require large batch sizes ( > 25) to implement. Because the majority of microarray studies are conducted using much smaller sample sizes, existing methods are not sufficient. We propose parametric and non-parametric empirical Bayes frameworks for adjusting data for batch effects that is robust to outliers in small sample sizes and performs comparable to existing methods for large samples. We illustrate our methods using two example data sets and show that our methods are justifiable, easy to apply, and useful in practice. Software for our method is freely available at: http://biosun1.harvard.edu/complab/batch/.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites

              With the proliferation of multi-site neuroimaging studies, there is a greater need for handling non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols. Such unwanted sources of variation, which we refer to as “scanner effects”, can hinder the detection of imaging features associated with clinical covariates of interest and cause spurious findings. In this paper, we investigate scanner effects in two large multi-site studies on cortical thickness measurements across a total of 11 scanners. We propose a set of tools for visualizing and identifying scanner effects that are generalizable to other modalities. We then propose to use ComBat, a technique adopted from the genomics literature and recently applied to diffusion tensor imaging data, to combine and harmonize cortical thickness values across scanners. We show that ComBat removes unwanted sources of scan variability while simultaneously increasing the power and reproducibility of subsequent statistical analyses. We also show that ComBat is useful for combining imaging data with the goal of studying life-span trajectories in the brain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                04 January 2023
                2022
                : 13
                : 1045678
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Radiology, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB, Canada
                [2] 2Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB, Canada
                [3] 3Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences , Kerman, Iran
                [4] 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB, Canada
                [5] 5Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, United States
                [6] 6Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                [7] 7CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [8] 8Animal Imaging and Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [9] 9TBI and Concussion Center, Department of Neurology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, United States
                [10] 10Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden, Germany
                [11] 11Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York University Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY, United States
                [12] 12Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [13] 13Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [14] 14Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB, Canada
                [15] 15Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, United States
                [16] 16School of Psychology, University of New South Wales (UNSW) , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [17] 17Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, United States
                [18] 18Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center , Loma Linda, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Duan Xu, University of California, San Francisco, United States

                Reviewed by: Wolfgang Bogner, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Pierre-Gilles Henry, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States

                *Correspondence: Brenda Bartnik-Olson ✉ bbartnik@ 123456llu.edu

                This article was submitted to Applied Neuroimaging, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2022.1045678
                9845632
                36686533
                dba2864f-a17e-45ea-820e-ea681fe0ff10
                Copyright © 2023 Harris, Amiri, Bento, Cohen, Ching, Cudalbu, Dennis, Doose, Ehrlich, Kirov, Mekle, Oeltzschner, Porges, Souza, Tam, Taylor, Thompson, Quidé, Wilde, Williamson, Lin and Bartnik-Olson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 September 2022
                : 06 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 173, Pages: 17, Words: 14579
                Categories
                Neurology
                Review

                Neurology
                magnetic resonance spectroscopy,harmonization,multi-site,multi-vendor,prospective,retrospective,brain

                Comments

                Comment on this article