3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimizing the Use of Geriatric Livers for Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Region

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acceptance criteria for liver allografts are ever more expanding because of a persisting wait‐list mortality. Older livers are therefore offered and used more frequently for transplantation. This study aims to analyze the use and longterm outcome of these transplantations. Data were included on 17,811 first liver transplantations (LTs) and information on livers that were reported for allocation but not transplanted from 2000 to 2015 in the Eurotransplant (ET) region. Graft survival was defined as the period between transplantation and date of retransplantation or date of recipient death. In the study period, 2394 (13%) transplantations were performed with livers ≥70 years old. Graft survival was 74%, 57%, and 41% at 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year follow‐up, respectively. A history of diabetes mellitus in the donor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; P = 0.01) and positive hepatitis C virus antibody in the recipient (HR, 1.5; P < 0.001) are specific risk factors for transplantations with livers ≥70 years old. Although donor age is associated with a linearly increasing risk of graft loss between 25 and 80 years old, no difference in graft survival could be observed when “preferred” recipients were transplanted with a liver <70 or ≥70 years old (HR 1.1; CI 0.92‐1.23, P = 0.40) or with a donor <40 or ≥70 years old (HR 1.2; CI 0.96‐1.37, P = 0.13). Utilization of reported livers ≥70 years old increased from 42% in 2000‐2003 to 76% in 2013‐2015 without a decrease in graft survival ( P = 0.45). In conclusion, an important proportion of LTs in the ET region are performed with livers ≥70 years old. The risk of donor age on graft loss increases linearly between 25 and 80 years old. Livers ≥70 years old can, however, be transplanted safely in preferred patients and are to be used more frequently to further reduce wait‐list mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.

          To design a new score on risk assessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) based on both donor and recipient parameters.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hypothermic machine preservation facilitates successful transplantation of "orphan" extended criteria donor livers.

            Hypothermic machine preservation (HMP) remains investigational in clinical liver transplantation. It is widely used to preserve kidneys for transplantation with improved results over static cold storage (SCS). At our center, we have used HMP in 31 adults receiving extended criteria donor (ECD) livers declined by the originating United Network for Organ Sharing region ("orphan livers"). These cases were compared to ECD SCS cases in a matched cohort study design. Livers were matched for donor age, recipient age, cold ischemic time, donor risk index and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. HMP was performed for 3-7 h at 4-8 °C using our previously published protocol. Early allograft dysfunction rates were 19% in the HMP group versus 30% in the control group (p = 0.384). One-year patient survival was 84% in the HMP group versus 80% in the SCS group (p = NS). Post hoc analysis revealed significantly less biliary complications in the HMP group versus the SCS group (4 vs. 13, p = 0.016). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HMP group (13.64 ± 10.9 vs. 20.14 ± 11.12 days in the SCS group, p = 0.001). HMP provided safe and reliable preservation in orphan livers transplanted at our center.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Eurotransplant donor risk index in liver transplantation: ET-DRI.

              Recently we validated the donor risk index (DRI) as conducted by Feng et al. for the Eurotransplant region. Although this scoring system is a valid tool for scoring donor liver quality, for allocation purposes a scoring system tailored for the Eurotransplant region may be more appropriate. Objective of our study was to investigate various donor and transplant risk factors and design a risk model for the Eurotransplant region. This study is a database analysis of all 5939 liver transplantations from deceased donors into adult recipients from the 1st of January 2003 until the 31st of December 2007 in Eurotransplant. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. From 5723 patients follow-up data were available with a mean of 2.5 years. After multivariate analysis the DRI (p < 0.0001), latest lab GGT (p = 0.005) and rescue allocation (p = 0.007) remained significant. These factors were used to create the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index (ET-DRI). Concordance-index calculation shows this ET-DRI to have high predictive value for outcome after liver transplantation. Therefore, we advise the use of this ET-DRI for risk indication and possibly for allocation purposes within the Eurotrans-plant region. © Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                a.e.braat@lumc.nl
                Journal
                Liver Transpl
                Liver Transpl
                10.1002/(ISSN)1527-6473
                LT
                Liver Transplantation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1527-6465
                1527-6473
                31 January 2019
                February 2019
                : 25
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/lt.v25.2 )
                : 260-274
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Departments of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Medical Statistics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Internal Medicine Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Gastroenterology and Hepatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Eurotransplant International Foundation Leiden the Netherlands
                [ 6 ] Department of Hepatology, Division of Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam University Rotterdam the Netherlands
                [ 7 ] Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery University of Munich Hospital Munich Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address reprint requests to Andries E. Braat, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. Telephone: +31‐71‐5266188; FAX: +31‐71‐5266952;

                E‐mail: a.e.braat@ 123456lumc.nl

                Article
                LT25353
                10.1002/lt.25353
                6590373
                30317683
                db7182af-174b-4fce-856c-04cfb51c7dec
                Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Liver Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 29 June 2018
                : 26 September 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 6, Pages: 15, Words: 18825
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Longterm Outcomes
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                lt25353
                February 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.4 mode:remove_FC converted:24.06.2019

                Transplantation
                Transplantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article