32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Wearing Face Masks Strongly Confuses Counterparts in Reading Emotions

      research-article
      1 , 2 , *
      Frontiers in Psychology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      emotion, face masks, accuracy, confusion, COVID-19, pandemic, mouth

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Wearing face masks is one of the essential means to prevent the transmission of certain respiratory diseases such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although acceptance of such masks is increasing in the Western hemisphere, many people feel that social interaction is affected by wearing a mask. In the present experiment, we tested the impact of face masks on the readability of emotions. The participants ( N = 41, calculated by an a priori power test; random sample; healthy persons of different ages, 18–87 years) assessed the emotional expressions displayed by 12 different faces. Each face was randomly presented with six different expressions ( angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, neutral, and sad) while being fully visible or partly covered by a face mask. Lower accuracy and lower confidence in one’s own assessment of the displayed emotions indicate that emotional reading was strongly irritated by the presence of a mask. We further detected specific confusion patterns, mostly pronounced in the case of misinterpreting disgusted faces as being angry plus assessing many other emotions (e.g., happy, sad, and angry) as neutral. We discuss compensatory actions that can keep social interaction effective (e.g., body language, gesture, and verbal communication), even when relevant visual information is crucially reduced.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                25 September 2020
                2020
                25 September 2020
                : 11
                : 566886
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg , Bamberg, Germany
                [2] 2Research Group EPÆG (Ergonomics, Psychological Aesthetics, Gestalt) , Bamberg, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Joanna Sokolowska, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland

                Reviewed by: Karen Lander, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Frédéric Gosselin, Université de Montréal, Canada

                This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566886
                7545827
                33101135
                db3ab961-6f7c-4e53-a4ea-f6caf941ebf8
                Copyright © 2020 Carbon.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 May 2020
                : 02 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 8, Words: 6485
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                emotion,face masks,accuracy,confusion,covid-19,pandemic,mouth
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                emotion, face masks, accuracy, confusion, covid-19, pandemic, mouth

                Comments

                Comment on this article