Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and validation of the Remote Working Benefits & Disadvantages scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The changes that are constantly occurring in the labour sector have led organisations and companies to move towards digital transformation. This process was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and  conducted to a massive recourse to the practice of remote working, which in this study is understood as the term for the way of performing work outside the usual workplace and with the support of ICT. Currently, there are no flexible scales in the literature that allow measuring the benefits and disadvantages of remote working with a single instrument. Thus, the distinction between the positive and negative consequences of working remotely, substantiated by a solid literature, provides a framework for a systematical understanding of the issue. The aim of the present study is to develop and validate a scale on remote working benefits and disadvantages (RW-B&D scale). For this end, a preliminary Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with 304 participants, a tailored EFA with a sample of 301 workers and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with 677 workers were conducted. Participants were all Italian employees who worked remotely during the period of the COVID-19 health emergency. Data were collected between October 2020 and April 2021. The psychometric robustness of the model was assessed through bootstrap validation (5000 resamples), fit indices testing and measurement of factorial invariance. The statistical analyses demonstrated the bifactorial nature of the scale, supporting the research hypothesis. The model showed good fit indices, bootstrap validation reported statistically significant saturations, good reliability indices, and convergent and discriminant validity. Measurement invariance was tested for gender and organisational sector. The results suggested that the novel scale facilitates the quantitative measurement of the benefits and disadvantages associated with remote working in empirical terms. For this reason, it could be a streamlined and psychometrically valid instrument to identify the potential difficulties arising from remote working and, at the same time, the positive aspects that can be implemented to improve organisational well-being.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An index of factorial simplicity

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                emanuela.ingusci@unisalento.it
                fulvio.signore@unisalento.it
                claudio.cortese@unito.it
                monica.molino@unito.it
                paola.pasca@unisalento.it
                enrico.ciavolino@unisalento.it
                Journal
                Qual Quant
                Qual Quant
                Quality & Quantity
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0033-5177
                1573-7845
                29 April 2022
                29 April 2022
                : 1-25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9906.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2289 7785, Department of History, Society and Human Studies, , University of Salento, ; Studium 2000 - Building 5 - Via di Valesio, 24 - Lecce (LE) Office 18, Ground Floor, Lecce, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.7605.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2336 6580, Department of Psychology, , University of Turin, ; Via Verdi 10, 10124 Torino, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.445137.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0449 6322, Computer Science and New Technology, , WSB University, ; 80-266 Gdańsk, Poland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-9937
                Article
                1364
                10.1007/s11135-022-01364-2
                9052188
                db1506c1-76c0-45b8-ba78-a058666e5ace
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 February 2022
                Categories
                Article

                Social & Behavioral Sciences
                remote-working,sem,scale,validation,benefits,disadvantages
                Social & Behavioral Sciences
                remote-working, sem, scale, validation, benefits, disadvantages

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content52

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors850