41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy of sildenafil on ischaemic digital ulcer healing in systemic sclerosis: the placebo-controlled SEDUCE study

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Autoimmune Diseases, Patient perspective, Treatment

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess the effect of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, on digital ulcer (DU) healing in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

          Methods

          Randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients with SSc to assess the effect of sildenafil 20 mg or placebo, three times daily for 12 weeks, on ischaemic DU healing. The primary end point was the time to healing for each DU. Time to healing was compared between groups using Cox models for clustered data (two-sided tests, p=0.05).

          Results

          Intention-to-treat analysis involved 83 patients with a total of 192 DUs (89 in the sildenafil group and 103 in the placebo group). The HR for DU healing was 1.33 (0.88 to 2.00) (p=0.18) and 1.27 (0.85 to 1.89) (p=0.25) when adjusted for the number of DUs at entry, in favour of sildenafil. In the per protocol population, the HRs were 1.49 (0.98 to 2.28) (p=0.06) and 1.43 (0.93 to 2.19) p=0.10. The mean number of DUs per patient was lower in the sildenafil group compared with the placebo group at week (W) 8 (1.23±1.61 vs 1.79±2.40 p=0.04) and W12 (0.86±1.62 vs 1.51±2.68, p=0.01) resulting from a greater healing rate (p=0.01 at W8 and p=0.03 at W12).

          Conclusions

          The primary end point was not reached in intention-to-treat, partly because of an unexpectedly high healing rate in the placebo group. We found a significant decrease in the number of DUs in favour of sildenafil compared with placebo at W8 and W12, confirming a sildenafil benefit.

          Trial registration number

          NCT01295736.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee.

          (1980)
          A multicenter, ongoing study of early-diagnosed cases of systemic sclerosis and comparison patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and Raynaud's phenomenon was conducted in order to develop classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Preliminary criteria are proposed namely, the finding of either the sole major criterion, i.e., proximal scleroderma, or two or more of the minor criteria, i.e., 1) sclerodactyly, 2) digital pitting scars of fingertips or loss of substance of the distal finger pad, and 3) bilateral basilar pulmonary fibrosis. When applied to the case and comparison patients included in this study, these proposed criteria had a 97% sensitivity for definite systemic sclerosis and 98% specificity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach.

            Y. Lin (1994)
            Multivariate failure time data are commonly encountered in scientific investigations because each study subject may experience multiple events or because there exists clustering of subjects such that failure times within the same cluster are correlated. In this paper, I present a general methodology for analysing such data, which is analogous to that of Liang and Zeger for longitudinal data analysis. This approach formulates the marginal distributions of multivariate failure times with the familiar Cox proportional hazards models while leaving the nature of dependence among related failure times completely unspecified. The baseline hazard functions for the marginal models may be identical or different. Simple estimating equations for the regression parameters are developed which yield consistent and asymptotically normal estimators, and robust variance-covariance estimators are constructed to account for the intra-class correlation. Simulation results demonstrate that the large-sample approximations are adequate for practical use and that ignoring the intra-class correlation could yield rather misleading variance estimators. The proposed methodology has been fully implemented in a simple computer program which also incorporates several alternative approaches. Detailed illustrations with data from four clinical or epidemiologic studies are provided.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Natural history of ischemic digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: single-center retrospective longitudinal study.

              To describe the natural history of ischemic digital ulcers (DU) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). This single-center, retrospective, longitudinal study identified patients by demographic data, SSc history and type, Rodnan score, tobacco use, presence of autoantibodies, ongoing treatment, and DU history. One hundred three patients were enrolled, 46 with DU history and 57 without; 2 with DU were excluded. The mean duration of followup from the first non-Raynaud SSc symptoms was 12.3 +/- 6.3 years in patients with DU history and 12.1 +/- 7.0 years in patients without. In 43% of cases, first DU occurred within 1 year following first non-Raynaud SSc symptoms, and within 5 years in 73% of cases. In a multivariate analysis, younger patients at occurrence of first non-Raynaud SSc symptoms (HR = 0.77 per each 5 years older, 95% CI 0.66-0.90) with higher Rodnan scores (HR = 1.21 per 5 points, 95% CI 1.05-1.47) experienced earlier DU occurrences, which were delayed by vasodilator therapy (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32). Patients with shorter durations between first and second DU episodes, particularly with a second episode within 2 years of the first, experienced a higher yearly incidence of DU episodes (0.85 +/- 0.57 and 0.48 +/- 0.26, respectively, if less or more than 2 yrs; p = 0.04). Throughout the duration of followup, the incidence of finger amputation was 1.2% per patient-year in patients with DU history. Patients who are young at first sign of SSc, with high Rodnan scores and without vasodilator therapy, are at high risk of developing DU. Development of DU typically occurred within 5 years of the first non-Raynaud clinical symptom of SSc in the majority of patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Rheum Dis
                Ann. Rheum. Dis
                annrheumdis
                ard
                Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0003-4967
                1468-2060
                June 2016
                20 May 2015
                : 75
                : 6
                : 1009-1015
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Médecine Interne, Hopital Huriez, Université de Lille , Lille, France
                [2 ]Médecine Vasculaire , CHU , Grenoble, France
                [3 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu , Nantes, France
                [4 ]Rhumatologie, Hôpital Hautepierre , Strasbourg, France
                [5 ]Médecine Interne, CHR Rennes Sud , Rennes, France
                [6 ]Médecine Interne, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes , Paris, France
                [7 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital de l'Archet 1 , Nice, France
                [8 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Dupuytren , Limoges, France
                [9 ]Médecine Vasculaire, Hôpital Saint Joseph , Paris, France
                [10 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Robert Debré , Reims, France
                [11 ]Médecine Interne 2, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière , Paris, France
                [12 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Nord, Aix Marseille Université , Marseille, France
                [13 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Bretonneau , Tours, France
                [14 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Saint Louis , Paris, France
                [15 ]Medicine interne and Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DHU i2B), AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine , Paris, France
                [16 ]Rhumatologie A, Hôpital Cochin , Paris, France
                [17 ]Médecine Interne, Hôpital Edouard Herriot , Lyon, France
                [18 ]Orgamétrie Biostatistiques , Roubaix, France
                Author notes

                Handling editor Tore K Kvien

                [Correspondence to ] Professor Eric Hachulla, Scleroderma National Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Université de Lille, Hôpital Huriez, Place de Verdun, Lille cedex 59037, France; ehachullla@ 123456chru-lille.fr
                Article
                annrheumdis-2014-207001
                10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207001
                4893100
                25995322
                db10c55f-c977-49d4-8d99-71c20ae64e43
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 15 November 2014
                : 20 April 2015
                : 23 April 2015
                Categories
                1506
                Clinical and Epidemiological Research
                Extended report
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Immunology
                autoimmune diseases,patient perspective,treatment
                Immunology
                autoimmune diseases, patient perspective, treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article