4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In the initial PALOMA-2 (NCT01740427) analysis with median follow-up of 23 months, palbociclib plus letrozole significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; P < 0.001]. Herein, we report results overall and by subgroups with extended follow-up.

          Methods

          In this double-blind, phase 3 study, post-menopausal women with ER+/HER2− ABC who had not received prior systemic therapy for their advanced disease were randomized 2:1 to palbociclib-letrozole or placebo-letrozole. Endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS (primary), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

          Results

          After a median follow-up of approximately 38 months, median PFS was 27.6 months for palbociclib–letrozole ( n = 444) and 14.5 months for placebo-letrozole ( n = 222) (HR 0.563; 1-sided P < 0.0001). All subgroups benefited from palbociclib treatment. The improvement of PFS with palbociclib-letrozole was maintained in the next 2 subsequent lines of therapy and delayed the use of chemotherapy (40.4 vs. 29.9 months for palbociclib–letrozole vs. placebo-letrozole). Safety data were consistent with the known profile. Patients’ quality of life was maintained.

          Conclusions

          With approximately 15 months of additional follow-up, palbociclib plus letrozole continued to demonstrate improved PFS compared with placebo plus letrozole in the overall population and across all patient subgroups, while the safety profile remained favorable and quality of life was maintained. These data confirm that palbociclib-letrozole should be considered the standard of care for first-line therapy in patients with ER+/HER2− ABC, including those with low disease burden or long disease-free interval. Sponsored by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01740427.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-05125-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone for HER2+ (ErbB2+) metastatic breast cancer: quality-of-life assessment.

            The randomized phase III trial EGF100151 demonstrated that the combination of lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C) significantly improved time to progression (TTP) compared with capecitabine alone (C) in heavily pretreated patients with HER2+ (ErbB2+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This analysis assessed the effects of study treatments on quality of life (QOL) among patients in EGF100151. Quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Patients completed questionnaires during efficacy and safety assessment visits (i.e., at screening visit, every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, every 12 weeks thereafter, and at discontinuation of study treatment). Primary analyses compared the treatment groups based on change from baseline QOL. Exploratory analyses compared proportion of patients achieving minimum important differences (MID) in QOL scores and the relationship between QOL and tumor status. Quality of life for patients in both treatment groups was maintained during 24 weeks of follow-up. Adjusted mean changes from baseline in all QOL scores for the L + C arm were comparable to those for the C arm. The between-group differences ranged from 0.7 to 2.2 (FACT-B total) and 0.3 to 1.8 (EQ-5D visual analog scale) and were consistently in favor of the L + C arm, although not statistically significant. Patients with an objective tumor response or stable disease showed clinically meaningful differences in QOL scores compared to patients with progressive disease. A greater proportion of patients receiving L + C versus C achieved the MID for all five QOL scores, although differences were not statistically significant. The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine significantly increases TTP without any evidence of a deleterious effect on patients' QOL, confirming its clinical benefit in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced HER2+ breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A small sample study of the STEPP approach to assessing treatment-covariate interactions in survival data.

              A new, intuitive method has recently been proposed to explore treatment-covariate interactions in survival data arising from two treatment arms of a clinical trial. The method is based on constructing overlapping subpopulations of patients with respect to one (or more) covariates of interest and in observing the pattern of the treatment effects estimated across the subpopulations. A plot of these treatment effects is called a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot. Here, we explore the small sample characteristics of the asymptotic results associated with the method and develop an alternative permutation distribution-based approach to inference that should be preferred for smaller sample sizes. We then describe an extension of the method to the case in which the pattern of estimated quantiles of survivor functions is of interest.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1-415-353-7070 , hope.rugo@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Res. Treat
                Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
                Springer US (New York )
                0167-6806
                1573-7217
                10 January 2019
                10 January 2019
                2019
                : 174
                : 3
                : 719-729
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), , University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, ; 1600 Divisadero St, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9632 6718, GRID grid.19006.3e, Division of Hematology/Oncology, , David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, ; Santa Monica, CA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0639 6384, GRID grid.418596.7, Department of Medical Oncology, , Institut Curie, ; Paris, France
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9503 7068, GRID grid.417988.b, Centre Eugène Marquis, ; Rennes, France
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000123222966, GRID grid.6936.a, Frauenklinik und Poliklinik Klinikum rechts der Isar, , Technische Universität München, ; Munich, Germany
                [6 ]Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, State Budget Medical Institution, Ufa, Russia
                [7 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 973X, GRID grid.5252.0, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, , Brustzentrum der Universität München (LMU), ; Munich, Germany
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 4637, GRID grid.489080.d, Breast Cancer Center, , Memorial Cancer Institute, ; Hollywood, FL USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8800 7493, GRID grid.410513.2, Patient and Health Impact, , Pfizer Inc, ; New York, NY USA
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8800 7493, GRID grid.410513.2, Clinical Statistics, , Pfizer Inc, ; La Jolla, CA USA
                [12 ]Global Product Development, Clinical, Pfizer S.r.l, Milan, Italy
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8800 7493, GRID grid.410513.2, Global Product Development, Clinical, , Pfizer Inc, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8800 7493, GRID grid.410513.2, Global Product Development, Clinical, , Pfizer Inc, ; Collegeville, PA USA
                [15 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0702 3000, GRID grid.248762.d, Department of Medical Oncology, , British Columbia Cancer Agency, ; Vancouver, BC Canada
                Article
                5125
                10.1007/s10549-018-05125-4
                6438948
                30632023
                da699fac-94b5-4cc0-bf24-2d0f6d6e3bb6
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 21 December 2018
                : 26 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004319, Pfizer;
                Categories
                Clinical Trial
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                breast cancer,er+,her2−,cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor,palbociclib,letrozole

                Comments

                Comment on this article