0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison between effect of etomidate and thiopentone on blood glucose in diabetic patients – A randomised controlled trial

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION Several anaesthetic agents have been investigated for their effect on stress response and hyperglycaemia in diabetics and non-diabetics.[1 2 3 4 5] By cortisol suppression, etomidate decreases blood glucose (BG) in healthy patients.[6] The effect of etomidate on BG in diabetics is unknown. We hypothesise that etomidate lowers BG in diabetic patients. This study compared the impact of general anaesthesia (GA) induction with etomidate and thiopentone on BG in diabetic patients. METHODS This randomised controlled trial was conducted after obtaining Institutional Research Ethics Committee approval (No. EC/NIMS/1799/2016) and the study was registered at Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/02/007752, www.ctri.nic.in). Written informed consent for participation in the study and use of patient data for research were obtained. The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, 2013. One hundred diabetic patients aged between 40 and 65 years with preoperative glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <8% and undergoing less than 3 h of surgery under GA were enroled. Patients with other endocrine disorders or medications that might influence BG perioperatively, patients receiving regional anaesthesia, patients with hepatic or renal disease, and pregnant and lactating women were excluded. Computer-generated simple randomisation was done, and the allocation was concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The participant, investigator, outcome assessor and data entry operator were all blinded to the drug administered. Patients were randomised to group T (n = 50) and group E (n = 50) and received intravenous (IV) thiopentone or etomidate for anaesthesia induction, respectively. If any included patients required perioperative beta-blockers, steroids or vasopressors after induction, they were excluded from the analysis. Standard preoperative fasting orders were followed. All patients were scheduled as the first on the list. Diabetic medications were continued, and oral hypoglycaemics/insulin were withheld on the morning of surgery. After establishing standard monitors, fentanyl 2 μg/kg IV was administered. BG was recorded (T0) by pinprick using BG reagent strips (Medisense; Abbott Laboratories, Maidenhead, UK) and glucometer (Optium; Abbott Laboratories, Illinois USA). IV Ringer’s lactate was infused at 2 mL/kg/h. Anaesthesia was induced with IV etomidate or thiopentone until response to verbal commands was lost. After achieving sufficient relaxation with IV atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, tracheal intubation was performed. Subsequently, anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane 0.7–1.2 minimum alveolar concentration in 50% air and oxygen. Fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV bolus was administered hourly, and neuromuscular blockade was maintained with atracurium infusion 0.25 μg/kg/h IV. At the end of the surgery, residual neuromuscular blockade was antagonised with glycopyrrolate 0.02 mg/kg and neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg IV, and the trachea was extubated. In the postoperative period, Ringer’s lactate 100 mL/h was continued till the commencement of oral intake. BG was measured at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after induction. If BG was <70 mg/dL, 50% dextrose 1 mL/kg IV was given, 5% dextrose infusion at 100 mL/h was started, and the study was discontinued. If any measurement of BG was more than 250 mg/dl, insulin infusion was started. The dose of the insulin infusion was adjusted to maintain BG less than 200 mg/dl; BG was monitored second hourly in patients who received insulin infusion until discontinuation. The requirement for insulin was noted. The systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at the baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after intubation. Incidences of hypotension (30% decrease in MAP from baseline), hypertension (MAP >30% from baseline), bradycardia (HR <50 beats/min), hiccups, myoclonus and pain on injection of the anaesthetic agent were noted. The primary outcome was to find the effect of the etomidate and thiopentone on BG up to 24 h after induction of GA. The secondary outcomes were to compare the effect on haemodynamics during induction and tracheal intubation, the incidence of myoclonus and pain on IV anaesthetic induction agent injection. The sample size calculation was done using data from a pilot study in which the mean BG in group E was 138 mg/dL and group T was 158 mg/dL with a pooled standard deviation (SD) of 34 at 4 h after induction of GA. The α error was set at 0.05 and the β error at 0.20. Accounting for a dropout of 10%, 50 patients were enroled in each group. The statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software 17 version (International Business Machines, New York, USA). Paired t-test was done to analyse continuous data, and the Chi-square test was done for categorical data. The intragroup comparison was done by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS A total of 89 patients were analysed [Figure 1]. There was no difference in age, body mass index, surgery duration and insulin requirement. More females were present in group E [Table 1]. The mean (SD) [95% confidence interval] dose of etomidate and thiopentone was 0.19 (0.03) [0.10–0.276] mg/kg and 3.84 (1.02) [3.53–4.14] mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.0001). Types of surgery included were minimally invasive surgeries (percutaneous nephrolithotomy [12], ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy [5], laparoscopic cholecystectomy [12], laparoscopic oophorectomy[3] and diagnostic laparoscopy [3]]), fixation of fracture upper limb (12) and lumbar laminectomy (17) [Table 1]. There was no difference in BG levels between the groups. A significant increase in BG levels was observed in both groups 2 h after induction [Table 2]. None had haemodynamic instability at induction. Myoclonus was observed in two patients in group E. Four patients in group E and two in group T complained of pain on injection (P = 0.322). Hiccups were observed in 12 and one patient in groups T and E, respectively (P = 0.001). All patients resumed normal diet and antidiabetic regimen within 12 h following extubation. Figure 1 Consolidated standards of reporting trials diagram of the study Table 1 Demographic data Demographic data Group E (n=42) Group T (n=47) Age (years) 53 (10.8) 53.11 (8.49) Male/female 10/32 23/24 Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.8 (3.7) 25.67 (3.24) Duration of surgery (min) 122.5 (41.9) 123.4 (50.3) Patients given insulin 4 5 Type of surgery  Endoscopic procedures 12 23  Surgeries on breast 8 8  Thyroidectomy 2 3  Other surgeries 20 13 Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or numbers Table 2 Comparison of blood glucose levels (mg/dL) between groups E and T Time intervals Group E (n=42) Mean (SD) (95% CI) Group T (n=47) Mean (SD) (95% CI) P 0 133.57 (40.81) (125.50–141.64) 134.47 (40.93) (126.81–142.12) 0.560 15 min 133.29 (37.78) (125.81–140.76) 134.72 (46.94) (125.94–143.49) 0.528 30 min 136.98 (41.00) (128.87–145.08) 140.17 (42.35) (132.25–148.08) 0.378 60 min 157.52 (38.74) (149.85–165.18) 160.23 (52.27) (150.45–170.00) 0.539 2 h 187.88 (52.81)* (177.43–198.32) 192.55 (57.57)* (181.78–203.31) 0.307 4 h 200.12 (53.57)* (189.52–210.71) 218.66 (81.65)* (203.39–233.92) 0.100 8 h 210.88 (52.67)* (200.47– 221.22) 218.00 (71.98)* (204.54–231.45) 0.365 12 h 195.14 (70.76)* (200.46–221.29) 203.89 (65.01)* (191.73–216.04) 0.395 24 h 176.90 (58.15)* (165.40–188.39) 170.02 (54.43)* (159.84–180.19) 0.861 CI=confidence interval, SD=standard deviation. *P<0.05 from the baseline within the group DISCUSSION In the present study, there was no difference in BG levels measured up to 24 h after induction of GA with either etomidate or thiopentone. People with diabetes are at increased risk of endothelial dysfunction, surgical site infections and postoperative stroke.[7 8 9] The choice of anaesthetic techniques and agents is essential in glycaemic control. Although not commonly used, etomidate may be used for cardiovascular stability. With the revival of interest in etomidate as an induction agent, there is a need to reassess its endocrine and metabolic effects, especially in patients with diabetes, which this study has partially addressed. Etomidate reduces BG levels by 18 mg/dL in non-diabetics.[10] A single induction dose of etomidate suppresses hormone production for 6–12 h, while infusion for 1–2 h blocks cortisol synthesis up to 24 h.[11,12] In this study, the primary outcome measured was BG at 4 h, a time point chosen based on the duration of cortisol suppression by etomidate. There was no difference in BG levels either at 4 h or at any other time up to 24 h in either group. This may be because the surgeries included were mostly superficial or minimally invasive. The other reason may be the smaller dose of etomidate used in the current study compared to the reported decrease in BG with 0.35 mg/kg etomidate.[10] Uniform protocol, scheduling all study participants first on the list and standardisation of fasting duration and IV fluids were the strengths of this study. The study’s limitations included subjective endpoint for induction and non-standardisation of the surgical procedures. CONCLUSION The induction of GA with etomidate does not affect blood sugar levels in diabetic patients compared to thiopentone. Study data availability De-identified data may be requested with reasonable justification from the authors (email to the corresponding author) and shall be shared after approval as per the authors’ institutional policy. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Etomidate inhibits adrenocortical function in surgical patients.

            Postoperative adrenocortical function was compared in 23 out-patients receiving either thiopental, 4 mg/kg, for induction and a thiopental infusion, 0.26 mg . kg-1 . min-1, in combination with nitrous oxide 70% for maintenance of anesthesia (control); etomidate, 0.4 mg/kg, for induction followed by an etomidate infusion, 0.02 mg . kg-1 . min-1, and nitrous oxide 70% for maintenance (etomidate I); or etomidate, 0.4 mg/kg, for induction and a thiopental infusion, 0.22 mg . kg-1 . min-1, in combination with nitrous oxide 70% for maintenance (etomidate II). The norepinephrine response to anesthesia and surgery did not differ significantly between the three groups. The postoperative cortisol response to ACTH stimulation was normal in the control group (maximum rise in plasma cortisol was 20.1 +/- 2.9 micrograms/dl [mean +/- SEM] ), however, it was decreased in all patients receiving etomidate, whether by a short infusion (mean change in plasma cortisol was -3.8 +/- 1.9 micrograms/dl) or as a single induction dose (mean change in plasma cortisol was -4.0 +/- 2.0 micrograms/dl). Similarly, the postoperative aldosterone levels in the control group increased normally in response to ACTH (+ 10.2 +/- 3.0 ng/dl) but decreased in both the etomidate I and etomidate II groups (-3.0 +/- 0.7 ng/dl and -3.3 +/- 1.0 ng/dl, respectively). Because ACTH was administered exogenously, etomidate-induced suppression of adrenocortical response appeared to be a direct effect on the adrenal gland, which was present at a time when the serum etomidate levels were in the subhypnotic range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of etomidate on hormonal responses to surgical stress.

              The hormonal responses to surgical stress were examined in 10 patients scheduled for elective gynecologic laparotomy. Anesthesia was induced with either thiopental, 4 mg/kg, or etomidate, 0.35 mg/kg, and maintained with nitrous oxide and enflurane. Plasma cortisol, aldosterone, ACTH, and catecholamines were measured during the 24 h after the induction of anesthesia. The catecholamine responses of the patients whose anesthesia was induced with either drug were similar. The plasma ACTH concentrations for the etomidate group were greater than baseline values and the concentrations in the thiopental group (P less than 0.05) in the fourth and fifth hours. In the patients receiving thiopental, both cortisol and aldosterone concentrations were greater than the baseline value (P less than 0.05) in the second to fourth hours after induction. In the etomidate group, the plasma concentrations of cortisol were less than baseline values (P less than 0.05) in the first and second hours after induction of anesthesia and both cortisol and aldosterone were lower than those in the thiopental group (P less than 0.05) in the half to fourth hours after induction. These results confirm an earlier report of the suppression of cortisol after etomidate administration and, because aldosterone also was suppressed, suggests that etomidate exerts its effect by inhibiting early stages of steroidogenesis in the adrenal cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Anaesth
                Indian J Anaesth
                IJA
                Indian J Anaesth
                Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0019-5049
                0976-2817
                November 2023
                21 November 2023
                : 67
                : Suppl 4
                : S284-S287
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, NIMS, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [1 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Nizwa Hospital, Nizwa, Oman, India
                [2 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, ESIC Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Indira Gurajala, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, NIMS, Hyderabad - 500 082, Telangana, India. E-mail: indiradevraj@ 123456yahoo.co.in
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-1188
                Article
                IJA-67-284
                10.4103/ija.ija_893_22
                10768912
                da2f6a27-fe8e-4466-b766-300022e4b286
                Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 04 November 2022
                : 16 September 2023
                : 18 September 2023
                Categories
                Clinical Communication

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article