2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An integrative pan-cancer analysis revealing the difference in small ring finger family of SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The SCF (Skp1-cullin-F-box proteins) complex is the largest family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that mediate multiple specific substrate proteins degradation. Two ring-finger family members RBX1/ROC1 and RBX2/RNF7/SAG are small molecular proteins necessary for ubiquitin ligation activity of the multimeric SCF complex. Accumulating evidence indicated the involvement of RBX proteins in the pathogenesis and development of cancers, but no research using pan-cancer analysis for evaluating their difference has been directed previously.

          Methods

          We investigated RBX1/2 expression patterns and the association with clinicopathological features, and survivals of cancer patients obtained from the TCGA pan-cancer data. The binding energies of RBX1/2-CUL1 complexes were preliminarily calculated by using molecular dynamics simulations. Meanwhile, we assessed their immune infiltration level across numerous databases, including TISIDB and Timer database.

          Results

          High expression levels of RBX1/2 were observed in most cancer types and correlated with poor prognosis of patients analyzed. Nonetheless, exceptions were observed: RBX2 expression in KICH was higher than normal renal tissues and played a detrimental role in KICH. The expression of RBX1 was not associated with the prognostic risk of KICH. Moreover, the combination of RBX1 and CUL1 expression is more stable than that of RBX2 and CUL1. RBX1/2 expression showed their own specific characteristics in tumor pathological stages and grades, copy number variation and immune components.

          Conclusions

          These findings not only indicated that the difference of RBX1/2 might result in varying degrees of tumor progression, but also suggested that they might serve as biomarkers for immune infiltration in cancers, shedding new light on therapeutics of cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          TIMER: A Web Server for Comprehensive Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells.

          Recent clinical successes of cancer immunotherapy necessitate the investigation of the interaction between malignant cells and the host immune system. However, elucidation of complex tumor-immune interactions presents major computational and experimental challenges. Here, we present Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER; cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer) to comprehensively investigate molecular characterization of tumor-immune interactions. Levels of six tumor-infiltrating immune subsets are precalculated for 10,897 tumors from 32 cancer types. TIMER provides 6 major analytic modules that allow users to interactively explore the associations between immune infiltrates and a wide spectrum of factors, including gene expression, clinical outcomes, somatic mutations, and somatic copy number alterations. TIMER provides a user-friendly web interface for dynamic analysis and visualization of these associations, which will be of broad utilities to cancer researchers. Cancer Res; 77(21); e108-10. ©2017 AACR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses1

            Genomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project has led to the comprehensive molecular characterization of multiple cancer types. The large sample numbers in TCGA offer an excellent opportunity to address questions associated with tumo heterogeneity. Exploration of the data by cancer researchers and clinicians is imperative to unearth novel therapeutic/diagnostic biomarkers. Various computational tools have been developed to aid researchers in carrying out specific TCGA data analyses; however there is need for resources to facilitate the study of gene expression variations and survival associations across tumors. Here, we report UALCAN, an easy to use, interactive web-portal to perform to in-depth analyses of TCGA gene expression data. UALCAN uses TCGA level 3 RNA-seq and clinical data from 31 cancer types. The portal's user-friendly features allow to perform: 1) analyze relative expression of a query gene(s) across tumor and normal samples, as well as in various tumor sub-groups based on individual cancer stages, tumor grade, race, body weight or other clinicopathologic features, 2) estimate the effect of gene expression level and clinicopathologic features on patient survival; and 3) identify the top over- and under-expressed (up and down-regulated) genes in individual cancer types. This resource serves as a platform for in silico validation of target genes and for identifying tumor sub-group specific candidate biomarkers. Thus, UALCAN web-portal could be extremely helpful in accelerating cancer research. UALCAN is publicly available at http://ualcan.path.uab.edu.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free.

              This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simulations. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs. GROMACS is in the public domain and distributed (with source code and documentation) under the GNU General Public License. It is maintained by a group of developers from the Universities of Groningen, Uppsala, and Stockholm, and the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research in Mainz. Its Web site is http://www.gromacs.org. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                18 August 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 968777
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Medical Oncology, Xiang’an Hospital of Xiamen University , Xiamen, China
                [2] 2Department of Medical Oncology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Endocrine-Related Cancer Precision Medicine , Xiamen, China
                [3] 3Department of Respiratory, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Xiang’an Hospital of Xiamen University , Xiamen, China
                [4] 4Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University , Putian, China
                [5] 5Department of Gastroenterology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University , Xiamen, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jian Song, University Hospital Münster, Germany

                Reviewed by: Lele Zhu, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; Ling Yin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; Yi Sun, Zhejiang University, China

                *Correspondence: Hanxiang An, anhanxiang@ 123456xmu.edu.cn

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2022.968777
                9434121
                36059474
                d9fc1b06-dc46-4443-8d62-405fbafd0773
                Copyright © 2022 Huang, Li, Liu, Shi, Li and An

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 June 2022
                : 01 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 16, Words: 4798
                Funding
                Funded by: Beijing Medical and Health Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100011930;
                Award ID: F3142C
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research

                Immunology
                pan-cancer,ring-finger proteins,scf complex,prognosis,immune infiltration,difference
                Immunology
                pan-cancer, ring-finger proteins, scf complex, prognosis, immune infiltration, difference

                Comments

                Comment on this article