Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Shelterin and subtelomeric DNA sequences control nucleosome maintenance and genome stability

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Telomeres and the shelterin complex cap and protect the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres are flanked by the subtelomeric sequences that have also been implicated in telomere regulation, although their role is not well defined. Here, we show that, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe , the telomere‐associated sequences ( TAS ) present on most subtelomeres are hyper‐recombinogenic, have metastable nucleosomes, and unusual low levels of H3K9 methylation. Ccq1, a subunit of shelterin, protects TAS from nucleosome loss by recruiting the heterochromatic repressor complexes CLRC and SHREC , thereby linking nucleosome stability to gene silencing. Nucleosome instability at TAS is independent of telomeric repeats and can be transmitted to an intrachromosomal locus containing an ectopic TAS fragment, indicating that this is an intrinsic property of the underlying DNA sequence. When telomerase recruitment is compromised in cells lacking Ccq1, DNA sequences present in the TAS promote recombination between chromosomal ends, independent of nucleosome abundance, implying an active function of these sequences in telomere maintenance. We propose that Ccq1 and fragile subtelomeres co‐evolved to regulate telomere plasticity by controlling nucleosome occupancy and genome stability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines.

          Epitope tagging of proteins as a strategy for the analysis of function, interactions and the subcellular distribution of proteins has become widely used. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, molecular biological techniques have been developed that use a simple PCR-based strategy to introduce epitope tags to chromosomal loci (Wach et al., 1994). To further employ the power of this strategy, a variety of novel tags was constructed. These tags were combined with different selectable marker genes, resulting in PCR amplificable modules. Only one set of primers is required for the amplification of any module. Furthermore, convenient laboratory techniques are described that facilitate the genetic manipulations of yeast strains, as well as the analysis of the epitope-tagged proteins. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epigenetics. Restricted epigenetic inheritance of H3K9 methylation.

            Posttranslational histone modifications are believed to allow the epigenetic transmission of distinct chromatin states, independently of associated DNA sequences. Histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation is essential for heterochromatin formation; however, a demonstration of its epigenetic heritability is lacking. Fission yeast has a single H3K9 methyltransferase, Clr4, that directs all H3K9 methylation and heterochromatin. Using releasable tethered Clr4 reveals that an active process rapidly erases H3K9 methylation from tethering sites in wild-type cells. However, inactivation of the putative histone demethylase Epe1 allows H3K9 methylation and silent chromatin maintenance at the tethering site through many mitotic divisions, and transgenerationally through meiosis, after release of tethered Clr4. Thus, H3K9 methylation is a heritable epigenetic mark whose transmission is usually countered by its active removal, which prevents the unauthorized inheritance of heterochromatin. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SHREC, an effector complex for heterochromatic transcriptional silencing.

              Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) is the mechanism generally thought by which heterochromatin effects silencing. However, recent discovery in fission yeast of a cis-acting posttranscriptional gene-silencing (cis-PTGS) pathway operated by the RNAi machinery at heterochromatin challenges the role of TGS in heterochromatic silencing. Here, we describe a multienzyme effector complex (termed SHREC) that mediates heterochromatic TGS in fission yeast. SHREC consists of a core quartet of proteins - Clr1, Clr2, Clr3, and Mit1 - which distribute throughout all major heterochromatin domains to effect TGS via distinct activities associated with the histone deacetylase Clr3 and the SNF2 chromatin-remodeling factor homolog Mit1. SHREC is also recruited to the telomeres by multiple independent mechanisms involving telomere binding protein Ccq1 cooperating with Taz1 and the RNAi machinery, and to euchromatic sites, via mechanism(s) distinct from its heterochromatin localization aided by Swi6/HP1. Our analyses suggest that SHREC regulates nucleosome positioning to assemble higher-order chromatin structures critical for heterochromatin functions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EMBO reports
                EMBO Rep
                EMBO
                1469-221X
                1469-3178
                November 09 2018
                January 2019
                November 12 2018
                January 2019
                : 20
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiological Chemistry BioMedical Center (BMC) Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Martinsried Germany
                [2 ]International Max Planck Research School for Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences Martinsried Germany
                [3 ]Protein Analysis Unit (ZfP) BioMedical Center (BMC) Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Martinsried Germany
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry Gene Center Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich Germany
                [5 ]Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry University of California San Francisco (UCSF) San Francisco CA USA
                Article
                10.15252/embr.201847181
                6322387
                30420521
                d9b44e24-1227-4980-b482-ede477638fa0
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content3,134

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors616