35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in serum fibronectin levels predict tumor recurrence in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fibronectin, a matrix glycoprotein aberrantly expressed in various tumor cells, is a known candidate biomarker for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we investigated whether serum fibronectin levels could predict tumor recurrence in patients with early-stage HCC after curative treatment. A total of 83 patients who showed complete response after initial curative treatment were included. The levels of serum fibronectin at baseline and 4–6 weeks after initial treatment were analyzed with regard to their associations with recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to construct a prognostic nomogram. Baseline fibronectin levels were not significantly correlated with tumor size, number, stage, and serum α-fetoprotein levels. However, decrease in serum fibronectin levels after treatment was significantly associated with reduced HCC recurrence in multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio, 0.009; p < 0.001). Furthermore, a nomogram consisting of gender and changes in serum fibronectin showed a good discriminatory capability for the prediction of HCC recurrence with an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.87. In conclusion, changes in serum fibronectin levels may be a surrogate indicator for assessment of treatment response in patients with early HCC after curative treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

              The endpoint in cancer research is overall survival. Nonetheless, other potential surrogate endpoints, such as response rate and time to progression, are currently used. Measurement of response rate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a controversial issue. The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria underestimate the actual response rate; thus, they were amended in 2000 by a panel of experts convened by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) to take into account treatment-induced tumor necrosis. Applying these guidelines, there was an association between response rate and outcome prediction. More recently, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline was proposed as a method for measuring treatment response based on tumor shrinkage, which is a valuable measure of antitumor activity of cytotoxic drugs. This method was initially adopted by regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for drug approval. However, anatomic tumor response metrics can be misleading when applied to molecular-targeted therapies or locoregional therapies in HCC. In 2008, a group of experts convened by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) developed a set of guidelines aimed at providing a common framework for the design of clinical trials in HCC and adapted the concept of viable tumor-tumoral tissue showing uptake in arterial phase of contrast-enhanced radiologic imaging techniques-to formally amend RECIST. These amendments conformed the AASLD-JNCI (Journal of the National Cancer Institute) guidelines and are summarized and clarified in the current article. They are referred to herein as the modified RECIST assessment (mRECIST). Further studies are needed to confirm the accuracy of this measurement compared with conventional gold standards such as pathologic studies of explanted livers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yoonjh@snu.ac.kr
                tspark@stats.snu.ac.kr
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                4 December 2020
                4 December 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 21313
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.31501.36, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5905, The Research Institute of Basic Sciences, , Seoul National University, ; Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]GRID grid.31501.36, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5905, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, , Seoul National University College of Medicine, ; 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080 Republic of Korea
                [3 ]GRID grid.412484.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0302 820X, Center for Precision Medicine, , Seoul National University Hospital, ; Seoul, Korea
                [4 ]GRID grid.411651.6, ISNI 0000 0004 0647 4960, Department of Internal Medicine, , Chung-Ang University Hospital, ; Seoul, Korea
                [5 ]GRID grid.31501.36, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5905, Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, , Seoul National University, ; Seoul, Korea
                [6 ]GRID grid.31501.36, ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5905, Department of Statistics, , Seoul National University, ; 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826 Republic of Korea
                Article
                78440
                10.1038/s41598-020-78440-w
                7719187
                33277619
                d97ddfba-0c6a-4244-9424-b60e65160f09
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 3 February 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008903, Ministry of Health and Welfare;
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award ID: HI16C2037
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003725, National Research Foundation of Korea;
                Award ID: 2017R1D1A1B03034639
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                liver cancer,tumour biomarkers
                Uncategorized
                liver cancer, tumour biomarkers

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content267

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors319