22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and hypothesis

          Our aim was to evaluate clinically relevant long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh or native tissue repair in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

          Methods

          We performed a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on trocar-guided mesh placement or native tissue repair in women with recurrent POP. Primary outcome was composite success, defined as absence of POP beyond the hymen, absence of bulge symptoms, and absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, pain, and dyspareunia. Multiple imputation was used for missing data of composite success and pain; estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

          Results

          Between August 2006 and July 2008, 194 women were randomized; 190 underwent surgery. At 7 years, 142 (75%) were available for analysis, of whom, the primary outcome could be calculated in 127. Composite success was 53% (95% CI 41, 66) for mesh and 54% (95% CI 42, 65) for native tissue. Repeat surgery for POP was 25% for mesh and 16% for native tissue (difference 9%; 95% CI −5, 23) and occurred in untreated compartments in the mesh group and treated compartments in the native tissue group. Mesh exposure rate was 42%; pain with mesh 39% and native tissue 50% (difference − 11%, 95% CI −27, 6); dyspareunia with mesh 20% and native tissue 17% (difference 3%, 95% CI −9, 17).

          Conclusions

          Seven-year composite success rates appeared similar for mesh and native tissue. Mesh did not reduce long-term repeat surgery rates due to de novo POP in nonmesh-treated vaginal compartments. Mesh exposure rates were high, though significant differences in pain and dyspareunia were not detected.

          Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00372190.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

          More than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

            To describe pelvic organ prolapse surgical success rates using a variety of definitions with differing requirements for anatomic, symptomatic, or re-treatment outcomes. Eighteen different surgical success definitions were evaluated in participants who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy within the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts trial. The participants' assessments of overall improvement and rating of treatment success were compared between surgical success and failure for each of the definitions studied. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to identify significant differences in outcomes between success and failure. Treatment success varied widely depending on definition used (19.2-97.2%). Approximately 71% of the participants considered their surgery "very successful," and 85.2% considered themselves "much better" than before surgery. Definitions of success requiring all anatomic support to be proximal to the hymen had the lowest treatment success (19.2-57.6%). Approximately 94% achieved surgical success when it was defined as the absence of prolapse beyond the hymen. Subjective cure (absence of bulge symptoms) occurred in 92.1% while absence of re-treatment occurred in 97.2% of participants. Subjective cure was associated with significant improvements in the patient's assessment of both treatment success and overall improvement, more so than any other definition considered (P<.001 and <.001, respectively). Similarly, the greatest difference in symptom burden and health-related quality of life as measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire scores between treatment successes and failures was noted when success was defined as subjective cure (P<.001). The definition of success substantially affects treatment success rates after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. The absence of vaginal bulge symptoms postoperatively has a significant relationship with a patient's assessment of overall improvement, while anatomic success alone does not. II.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.

              Currently, there is no global outcome assessment index in prolapse research. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) has only been validated in incontinence. Our aim was to validate its use following prolapse surgery. Women with prolapse were recruited from waiting lists and assessed objectively (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q)). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed with prolapse QoL questionnaire (pQoL). Patient goal achievement (visual analogue scale (VAS)) determined subjective satisfaction and PGI-I indicated overall satisfaction. We established construct validity of PGI-I by correlating final PGI-I response with other measures of response, measured at 1 year: (POP-Q/pQoL/VAS) RESULTS: There was excellent test-retest reliability and correlation between PGI-I and other outcome measures. We believe this is the first study validating PGI-I as a global index of response to prolapse surgery. This may be a valuable addition not only in clinical practice but also in trials comparing surgical interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31152604097 , fredmilani@me.com
                Journal
                Int Urogynecol J
                Int Urogynecol J
                International Urogynecology Journal
                Springer London (London )
                0937-3462
                1433-3023
                22 November 2017
                22 November 2017
                2018
                : 29
                : 6
                : 847-858
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0624 5690, GRID grid.415868.6, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, , Reinier de Graaf Hospital, ; P.O. Box 5011, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, GRID grid.413532.2, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, , Catharina Hospital, ; P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, Department for Health Evidence (133), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (791), , Radboud University Medical Center, ; P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000090126352, GRID grid.7692.a, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, , University Medical Center Utrecht, ; Heidelberglaan 100 P.O. Box 85500, Room F05.126, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                3512
                10.1007/s00192-017-3512-3
                5948295
                29167974
                d9766a7b-2244-4645-ab77-c1f43d1f3b91
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 28 August 2017
                : 5 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009933, Ethicon;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The International Urogynecological Association 2018

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                long-term outcome,mesh,native tissue,pain,pelvic organ prolapse,surgery
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                long-term outcome, mesh, native tissue, pain, pelvic organ prolapse, surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article