24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current landscape of therapeutic EUS: Changing paradigms in gastroenterology practice

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Therapeutic EUS has witnessed exponential growth in the last decade, but it has been considered investigational until recently. An increasing body of good-quality evidence is now demonstrating clear advantages over established alternatives, adding therapeutic EUS to management algorithms of complex hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) and gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. In this review, the available evidence and clinical role of therapeutic EUS in established and evolving applications will be discussed. A Graphical Summary for each scenario will provide (1) technical steps, (2) anatomical sketch, (3) best-supporting evidence, and (4) role in changing current and future GI practice. Therapeutic EUS has accepted well-established applications such as drainage of symptomatic peripancreatic fluid collections, biliary drainage in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and treatment of acute cholecystitis in unfit-for-surgery patients. In addition, good-quality evidence on several emerging indications ( e.g., treatment of gastric outlet obstruction, local ablation of pancreatic solid lesions, etc.) is promising. Specific emphasis will be given to how these technical innovations have changed management paradigms and algorithms and expanded the possibilities of gastroenterologists to provide therapeutic solutions to old and emerging clinical needs. Therapeutic EUS is cementing its role in everyday practice, radically changing the treatment of different HPB diseases and other conditions ( e.g., GI obstruction). The development of dedicated accessories and increased training opportunities will expand the ability of gastroenterologists to deliver highly effective yet minimally invasive therapies, potentially translating into a better quality of life, especially for oncological and fragile patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.

              Necrotizing pancreatitis with infected necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and death. Standard treatment is open necrosectomy. The outcome may be improved by a minimally invasive step-up approach. In this multicenter study, we randomly assigned 88 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and suspected or confirmed infected necrotic tissue to undergo primary open necrosectomy or a step-up approach to treatment. The step-up approach consisted of percutaneous drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy. The primary end point was a composite of major complications (new-onset multiple-organ failure or multiple systemic complications, perforation of a visceral organ or enterocutaneous fistula, or bleeding) or death. The primary end point occurred in 31 of 45 patients (69%) assigned to open necrosectomy and in 17 of 43 patients (40%) assigned to the step-up approach (risk ratio with the step-up approach, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.87; P=0.006). Of the patients assigned to the step-up approach, 35% were treated with percutaneous drainage only. New-onset multiple-organ failure occurred less often in patients assigned to the step-up approach than in those assigned to open necrosectomy (12% vs. 40%, P=0.002). The rate of death did not differ significantly between groups (19% vs. 16%, P=0.70). Patients assigned to the step-up approach had a lower rate of incisional hernias (7% vs. 24%, P=0.03) and new-onset diabetes (16% vs. 38%, P=0.02). A minimally invasive step-up approach, as compared with open necrosectomy, reduced the rate of the composite end point of major complications or death among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and infected necrotic tissue. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13975868.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endosc Ultrasound
                Endosc Ultrasound
                EUS
                Endosc Ultrasound
                Endoscopic Ultrasound
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                2303-9027
                2226-7190
                Jan-Feb 2023
                09 September 2022
                : 12
                : 1
                : 16-28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
                [4 ]Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
                [5 ]Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, AGEM Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
                [8 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Dr. Schalk W. van der Merwe, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and HPB Medicine, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: schalk.vandermerwe@ 123456uzleuven.be Dr. Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. E-mail: arcidiacono.paologiorgio@ 123456hsr.it
                Article
                EUS-12-16
                10.4103/EUS-D-21-00177
                10134933
                36124531
                d94553d8-8762-41b9-840a-bd5e7a6721d0
                Copyright: © 2022 SCHOLAR MEDIA PUBLISHING

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 18 August 2021
                : 02 June 2022
                Categories
                Review Article

                choledochoduodenostomy,gallbladder drainage,gastrojejunostomy,hepaticogastrostomy,radiofrequency ablation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content174

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors1,595