Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of Human Leukocyte Antigen DR Alleles, Immune-Related Adverse Events, and Survival Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use Among Patients With Advanced Malignant Melanoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What is the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy initiation and human leukocyte antigen genes in patients with advanced malignant melanoma?

          Findings

          In this case-control study of 132 adults with advanced malignant melanoma treated with ICIs, patients with irAEs had improved treatment response rates and better survival. Distinct HLA-DR alleles were associated with specific irAEs.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs after ICI therapy in patients with advanced melanoma is associated with improved treatment response, survival, and certain HLA-DR alleles.

          Abstract

          This case-control study examines the association between development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response to therapy, survival, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II genes in patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

          Abstract

          Importance

          Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increased survival in patients with advanced malignant melanoma but can be associated with a wide range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–DR alleles in conferring irAE risk has not been well studied.

          Objective

          To evaluate the association between irAEs and treatment response, survival, and the presence of HLA-DR alleles after ICI therapy in advanced melanoma.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This case-control study used the patient registry and biobanked samples from the tertiary referral University of Colorado Cancer Center. Specimens and clinical data were collected between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. Patients with advanced (stage III unresectable and stage IV) melanoma who received ICI therapy (n = 132) were included in the analysis.

          Exposures

          Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, anti–programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand, or the combination) for the treatment of advanced melanoma.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The association between irAEs and response to therapy, survival, and HLA-DR alleles.

          Results

          Among the cohort of 132 patients with advanced melanoma (mean [SD] age, 63.4 [7.2] years; 85 men [64%] and 47 women [36%]) treated with ICIs, 73 patients had at least 1 irAE and 59 did not have an irAE. Compared with patients without an irAE, patients with an irAE had higher treatment response rates (50 of 72 [69%] vs 28 of 57 [49%]; P = .02) and increased survival (median, 4.8 [IQR, 0.2-9.6] vs 3.2 [IQR, 0.1-9.2] years; P = .02). Specific HLA-DR alleles were associated with the type of irAE that developed: 7 of 10 patients (70%) who developed type 1 diabetes had DR4; 6 of 12 (50%) who developed hypothyroidism had DR8; 5 of 8 (63%) who developed hypophysitis had DR15; 3 of 5 (60%) who developed pneumonitis had DR1; and 8 of 15 (53%) who developed hepatitis had DR4.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings suggest that IrAEs are associated with treatment response rates and increased survival after ICI therapy for advanced melanoma. Because distinct HLA-DR alleles are associated with given adverse events, HLA genotyping before ICI therapy may aid in identifying risk for specific irAEs that could develop with such treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics

          Tumours respond differently to immunotherapies compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, raising questions about the assessment of changes in tumour burden—a mainstay of evaluation of cancer therapeutics that provides key information about objective response and disease progression. A consensus guideline—iRECIST—was developed by the RECIST working group for the use of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) in cancer immunotherapy trials, to ensure consistent design and data collection, facilitate the ongoing collection of trial data, and ultimate validation of the guideline. This guideline describes a standard approach to solid tumour measurements and definitions for objective change in tumour size for use in trials in which an immunotherapy is used. Additionally, it defines the minimum datapoints required from future trials and those currently in development to facilitate the compilation of a data warehouse to use to later validate iRECIST. An unprecedented number of trials have been done, initiated, or are planned to test new immune modulators for cancer therapy using a variety of modified response criteria. This guideline will allow consistent conduct, interpretation, and analysis of trials of immunotherapies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient HLA class I genotype influences cancer response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

            CD8+ T cell-dependent killing of cancer cells requires efficient presentation of tumor antigens by human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules. However, the extent to which patient-specific HLA-I genotype influences response to anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 is currently unknown. We determined the HLA-I genotype of 1,535 advanced cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Maximal heterozygosity at HLA-I loci (A, B, and C) improved overall survival after ICB compared to patients who were homozygous for at least one HLA locus. In two independent melanoma cohorts, patients with the HLA-B44 supertype had extended survival, whereas the HLA-B62 supertype (including HLA-B*15:01) or somatic loss of heterozygosity at HLA-I, was associated with poor outcome. Molecular dynamics simulations of HLA-B*15:01 revealed unique elements that may impair CD8+ T cell recognition of neoantigens. Our results have important implications for predicting response to ICB and for the design of neoantigen-based therapeutic vaccines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Nivolumab Efficacy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

              Importance Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with the efficacy of PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitors in patients with melanoma, but whether such an association exists for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has remained unknown. Objective To evaluate the relation of irAEs to nivolumab efficacy in NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants In this study based on landmark and multivariable analyses, a total of 134 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab in the second-line setting or later between December 2015 and August 2016 were identified from a review of medical records from multiple institutions, including a university hospital and community hospitals. Data were updated as of December 31, 2016. Exposures The absence or presence of any irAE before the landmark date. Main Outcomes and Measures Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival (PFS) according to the development of irAEs in 6-week landmark analysis were evaluated with the log-rank test as a preplanned primary objective. Overall survival (OS) was similarly evaluated. Multivariable analysis of both PFS and OS was performed with Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results In a cohort of 134 patients (median [range] age, 68 [33-85] years; 90 men [67%], 44 women [33%]), irAEs were observed in 69 of the 134 study patients (51%), including 12 patients (9%) with such events of grade 3 or 4, and 24 patients (18%) requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy. In 6-week landmark analysis, median PFS was 9.2 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached [NR]) and 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 7.5) ( P  = .04) whereas median OS was NR (95% CI, 12.3 to NR) and 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.6 to NR) ( P  = .01) for patients with or without irAEs, respectively. Multivariable analysis also revealed that irAEs were positively associated with survival outcome, with hazard ratios of 0.525 (95% CI, 0.287 to 0.937; P  = .03) for PFS and 0.282 (95% CI, 0.101 to 0.667; P  = .003) for OS. Conclusions and Relevance Development of irAEs was associated with survival outcome of nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings. This medical record review evaluates the relation of immune-related adverse events to nivolumab efficacy in non–small-cell lung cancer. Question Are immune-related adverse events associated with outcome of nivolumab treatment in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Findings In this multi-institutional medical record review including 134 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with nivolumab monotherapy, landmark and multivariable analyses showed that immune-related adverse events were significantly associated with a better treatment outcome. Meaning Early recognition and proper management of immune-related adverse events are important to maximize the therapeutic benefit of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with NSCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                13 December 2022
                December 2022
                13 December 2022
                : 5
                : 12
                : e2246400
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [4 ]University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [5 ]Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
                [6 ]Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 26, 2022.
                Published: December 13, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46400
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Akturk HK et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Aaron W. Michels, MD, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1775 Aurora Ct, Building M20, Mail Box A140, Aurora, CO 80045 ( aaron.michels@ 123456cuanschutz.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Michels had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Akturk, Van Gulick, Turner, Robinson, Michels.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Akturk, Couts, Baschal, Karakus, Van Gulick, Turner, Pyle, Michels.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Akturk, Couts, Karakus, Michels.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Akturk, Couts, Baschal, Van Gulick, Turner, Pyle, Robinson, Michels.
                Statistical analysis: Akturk, Karakus, Pyle.
                Obtained funding: Michels.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Couts, Baschal, Karakus, Turner, Michels.
                Supervision: Robinson, Michels.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by grants DK108868, DK032083, DK099317, and DK116073 from the National Institutes of Health.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National Institutes of Health had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See the Supplement.
                Article
                zoi221310
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46400
                9856415
                36512357
                d8cdc2c5-22fd-4f9f-9bd2-b737508bf97e
                Copyright 2022 Akturk HK et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 18 July 2022
                : 26 October 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content97

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors454