18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Role of TLRs in Anti-cancer Immunity and Tumor Rejection

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In recent years, a lot of scientific interest has focused on cancer immunotherapy. Although chronic inflammation has been described as one of the hallmarks of cancer, acute inflammation can actually trigger the immune system to fight diseases, including cancer. Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands have long been used as adjuvants for traditional vaccines and it seems they may also play a role enhancing efficiency of tumor immunotherapy. The aim of this perspective is to discuss the effects of TLR stimulation in cancer, expression of various TLRs in different types of tumors, and finally the role of TLRs in anti-cancer immunity and tumor rejection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy

          FOXP3-expressing regulatory T (Treg) cells, which suppress aberrant immune response against self-antigens, also suppress anti-tumor immune response. Infiltration of a large number of Treg cells into tumor tissues is often associated with poor prognosis. There is accumulating evidence that the removal of Treg cells is able to evoke and enhance anti-tumor immune response. However, systemic depletion of Treg cells may concurrently elicit deleterious autoimmunity. One strategy for evoking effective tumor immunity without autoimmunity is to specifically target terminally differentiated effector Treg cells rather than all FOXP3+ T cells, because effector Treg cells are the predominant cell type in tumor tissues. Various cell surface molecules, including chemokine receptors such as CCR4, that are specifically expressed by effector Treg cells can be the candidates for depleting effector Treg cells by specific cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies. In addition, other immunological characteristics of effector Treg cells, such as their high expression of CTLA-4, active proliferation, and apoptosis-prone tendency, can be exploited to control specifically their functions. For example, anti-CTLA-4 antibody may kill effector Treg cells or attenuate their suppressive activity. It is hoped that combination of Treg-cell targeting (e.g., by reducing Treg cells or attenuating their suppressive activity in tumor tissues) with the activation of tumor-specific effector T cells (e.g., by cancer vaccine or immune checkpoint blockade) will make the current cancer immunotherapy more effective.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL-1- and IL-18-mediated function.

            MyD88, originally isolated as a myeloid differentiation primary response gene, is shown to act as an adaptor in interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling by interacting with both the IL-1 receptor complex and IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK). Mice generated by gene targeting to lack MyD88 have defects in T cell proliferation as well as induction of acute phase proteins and cytokines in response to IL-1. Increases in interferon-gamma production and natural killer cell activity in response to IL-18 are abrogated. In vivo Th1 response is also impaired. Furthermore, IL-18-induced activation of NF-kappaB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is blocked in MyD88-/- Th1-developing cells. Taken together, these results demonstrate that MyD88 is a critical component in the signaling cascade that is mediated by IL-1 receptor as well as IL-18 receptor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Tumor-associated macrophages: from basic research to clinical application

              The fact that various immune cells, including macrophages, can be found in tumor tissues has long been known. With the introduction of concept that macrophages differentiate into a classically or alternatively activated phenotype, the role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) is now beginning to be elucidated. TAMs act as “protumoral macrophages,” contributing to disease progression. TAMs can promote initiation and metastasis of tumor cells, inhibit antitumor immune responses mediated by T cells, and stimulate tumor angiogenesis and subsequently tumor progression. As the relationship between TAMs and malignant tumors becomes clearer, TAMs are beginning to be seen as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of cancers, as well as therapeutic targets in these cases. In this review, we will discuss the origin, polarization, and role of TAMs in human malignant tumors, as well as how TAMs can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of cancer in clinics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                22 October 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 2388
                Affiliations
                [1] 1International Centre for Cancer Vaccine Science (ICCVS), University of Gdaǹsk , Gdaǹsk, Poland
                [2] 2Laboratory of Immune System Biology (LISB), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, MD, United States
                [3] 3University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [4] 4Department of Medical Biosciences, Umeå University , Umeå, Sweden
                [5] 5Université Paris 7, INSERM, UMR 1162 , Paris, France
                [6] 6Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute , Brno, Czechia
                [7] 7Laboratory of Immunoregulation and Cellular Therapies, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Gdaǹsk , Gdaǹsk, Poland
                [8] 8Cell Signaling Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [9] 9Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland School of Dentistry , Baltimore, MD, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alexandre Corthay, Oslo University Hospital, Norway

                Reviewed by: Dieter Kabelitz, University of Kiel, Germany; Justin Lathia, Case Western Reserve University, United States

                *Correspondence: Aleksandra Nita-Lazar nitalazarau@ 123456niaid.nih.gov

                This article was submitted to Molecular Innate Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                ‡Present address: Mohd M. Khan, Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VA, United States

                Benjamin L. Oyler, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2019.02388
                6817561
                31695691
                d8c29afc-1ad2-4569-a0a7-7988fa3d8f93
                Copyright © 2019 Urban-Wojciuk, Khan, Oyler, Fåhraeus, Marek-Trzonkowska, Nita-Lazar, Hupp and Goodlett.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 July 2019
                : 23 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 109, Pages: 10, Words: 8245
                Funding
                Funded by: Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 10.13039/100006492
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: 1R01AI123820-01
                Funded by: American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 10.13039/100005296
                Funded by: European Regional Development Fund 10.13039/501100008530
                Categories
                Immunology
                Mini Review

                Immunology
                toll-like receptors,immuno-oncology,anti-cancer immunity,tumor rejection,immunotherapy
                Immunology
                toll-like receptors, immuno-oncology, anti-cancer immunity, tumor rejection, immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article