8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an exploratory, placebo-controlled trial.

      American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
      Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, adverse effects, therapeutic use, Carbon Monoxide, blood, Disease Progression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Lung, drug effects, physiopathology, Male, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Pulmonary Fibrosis, drug therapy, Quality of Life, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Vital Capacity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An efficacious medical therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains elusive. To explore the efficacy and safety of etanercept in the treatment of IPF. This was a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter exploratory trial in subjects with clinically progressive IPF. Primary endpoints included changes in the percentage of predicted FVC and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin (Dl(CO(Hb))) and change in the alveolar to arterial oxygen pressure difference P(a-a)(O(2)) at rest from baseline over 48 weeks. Eighty-eight subjects received subcutaneous etanercept (25 mg) or placebo twice weekly as their sole treatment for IPF. No differences in baseline demographics and disease status were detected between treatment groups; the mean time from first diagnosis was 13.6 months and mean FVC was 63.9% of predicted. At 48 weeks, no significant differences in efficacy endpoints were observed between the groups. A nonsignificant reduction in disease progression was seen in several physiologic, functional, and quality-of-life endpoints among subjects receiving etanercept. There was no difference in adverse events between treatment groups. In this exploratory study in patients with clinically progressive IPF, etanercept was well tolerated. Although there were no differences in the predefined endpoints, a decreased rate of disease progression was observed on several measures. Further evaluation of TNF antagonists in the treatment of IPF may be warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00063869).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article