34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A comprehensive evaluation of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome ® system for ultrasound-guided diagnostic biopsy and selective excision of breast lesions

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      World Journal of Surgical Oncology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Minimally invasive breast biopsy technology is now considered a standard of care for the diagnostic evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. The aim of the current study was to present a comprehensive evaluation of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome ® system for ultrasound-guided diagnostic biopsy and selective excision of breast lesions.

          Methods

          A retrospective analysis was conducted of a series of 304 consecutive 8-gauge Mammotome ® procedures that were performed under ultrasound guidance by a single surgeon from March 2004 to December 2006. Multiple variables, including patient demographics, characteristics of the breast lesion (based on ultrasound and mammography), procedural and histopathology variables, and interval follow-up variables (based on ultrasound and mammography), were evaluated.

          Results

          Among 304 procedures, 235 (77%) were performed with the presumption of complete excision of the ultrasound lesion during Mammotome ® core acquisition, while 69 (23%) were performed with only partial excision of the ultrasound lesion during Mammotome ® core acquisition (diagnostic tissue sampling only). 100% of all ultrasound lesions were accurately diagnosed, demonstrating no apparent false-negative results among the 256 patients that were compliant with follow-up at a median interval follow-up duration of 11 months (range 1 to 37). Likewise, 89% of all appropriately selected ultrasound lesions were completely excised, as demonstrated on interval follow-up ultrasound at a median time of 6 months (range, 3 to 16). There were no independent predictors of successful complete excision of any given appropriately selected ultrasound lesion by the ultrasound-guided 8-gauge Mammotome ® biopsy technique.

          Conclusion

          The 8-gauge vacuum-assisted Mammotome ® system is highly accurate for ultrasound-guided diagnostic biopsy of suspicious breast lesions and is highly successful for complete excision of appropriately selected presumed benign breast lesions. This particular technology should be routinely offered to all appropriately selected patients that are evaluated by physicians involved in breast-specific health care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases.

          The aim of this study was to determine the indications, accuracy and complications of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) performed using ultrasonographic (US) guidance for non-palpable lesions. This was a prospective study in which results from consecutive US-guided VABB performed between January 1999 and April 2003 were subsequently compared to those from excisional biopsy or to long-term follow-up imaging. Four hundred and six lesions were submitted to VABB procedures. Out of those, 78.9% were benign, 18.8% were malignant, 1.7% was lobular neoplasia, and 0.4% was atypical duct hyperplasia. Underestimation occurred in 2.6% of the cases and false negative results in 0.6%. Sensitivity to VABB was 97%, specificity went up to 100%, negative predictive value was 99%, positive predictive value was 100%, and accuracy was 99%. Complications occurred in 9% of the patients. US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe procedure. The main indication is the non-palpable suspicious breast lesions (category 4). This new technique could be a good alternative for percutaneous and surgery biopsy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.

            In October 2002, ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision was shown to facilitate the complete removal of benign breast lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. This study was performed to ascertain the overall accuracy of ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision as evidenced by the frequency of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) underestimation. A retrospective review was conducted of 542 consecutive ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed between February 2000 and September 2004. Before July 2002, no attempt was made to completely remove all imaged lesion evidence. After July 2002, all patients underwent complete percutaneous excision of all imaged lesion evidence. Pathology review revealed 52 lesions that demonstrated ADH and no evidence of malignancy. Each patient with this diagnosis was offered surgical excision. Pathologic reports for each group were compared with the subsequent open surgical specimens. Of 542 consecutively diagnosed lesions, 52 displayed ADH with no evidence of malignancy (10%). Five patients refused operation. Of the 47 patients who underwent open excision, 6 (13%) were found to have malignancies. The rate of ADH underestimation was 6 of 18 (33%) in incisional biopsies and 0 of 29 performed with complete imaged lesion evidence (p=0.002). The rate of ADH underestimation in women who underwent ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision was zero, a result equivalent to open surgical biopsy. ADH is a more common finding in sonographic lesions than has been previously reported. Complete ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision is more accurate than nonexcisional ultrasound-guided biopsy. Patients so diagnosed have very low underestimation rates and may not require open surgical reexcision.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis and treatment of breast fibroadenomas by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy.

              Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (UGVAB) can serve as an efficient tool for the diagnosis and excision of breast fibroadenomas. Patients with a clinically and radiographically suspected breast fibroadenoma were prospectively referred for UGVAB to confirm the diagnosis and to attempt to excise the lesion. Fifty-two female patients, aged 19 to 68 years, were included in the 2-year study. All had at least 1 suspected fibroadenoma. The procedure was performed for a total of 56 lesions. Imaging modalities prior to biopsy to confirm the clinical suspicion included Doppler ultrasound and mammography or Doppler ultrasound alone. Tumor size and volume were recorded. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy was performed in all cases, with guidance using the 11-gauge Mammotome handheld vacuum-assisted biopsy system (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio). Major end points included diagnosis compatibility rate, excision rate, complications, and short-term follow-up. A tissue diagnosis was obtained in all cases and was compatible with the clinical diagnosis of fibroadenoma. Complete excision was achieved in all lesions less than or equal to 1.5 cm (mean volume, 0.25 mL). All lesions greater than 2 cm (mean volume, 1 mL) were incompletely excised. Of the 20 lesions measuring 1.5 to 2.0 cm, 11 (55%) were completely excised. The volume of all completely excised lesions was less than 0.9 mL. Four lesions with a volume less than 0.9 mL were incompletely excised due to bleeding. Ten of the 13 cases with incomplete excision were confident enough with the diagnosis to choose imaging follow-up instead of surgery. Two patients (16%) were referred by the radiologist for surgical excision. Only 1 patient with incomplete removal (8%) felt uncomfortable with the remnant lump and requested surgical excision. Although the breast fibroadenoma is a common benign breast tumor, the treatment and follow-up of these lesions is still debatable. We suggest that UGVAB, which has a well-documented role in the diagnosis of breast lesions, may provide an option for the definitive treatment of breast fibroadenomas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World J Surg Oncol
                World Journal of Surgical Oncology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7819
                2007
                30 July 2007
                : 5
                : 83
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
                [2 ]Department of Pathology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
                Article
                1477-7819-5-83
                10.1186/1477-7819-5-83
                1988825
                17663769
                d8127316-757f-4335-8a57-2275984ec9fb
                Copyright © 2007 Povoski and Jimenez; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 April 2007
                : 30 July 2007
                Categories
                Research

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article