0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machine learning prediction of tau‐PET in Alzheimer's disease using plasma, MRI, and clinical data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          Tau positron emission tomography (PET) is a reliable neuroimaging technique for assessing regional load of tau pathology in the brain, but its routine clinical use is limited by cost and accessibility barriers.

          METHODS

          We thoroughly investigated the ability of various machine learning models to predict clinically useful tau‐PET composites (load and laterality index) from low‐cost and non‐invasive features, for example, clinical variables, plasma biomarkers, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

          RESULTS

          Models including plasma biomarkers yielded the most accurate predictions of tau‐PET burden (best model: R‐squared = 0.66–0.69), with especially high contribution from plasma phosphorylated tau‐217 (p‐tau217). MRI variables were the best predictors of asymmetric tau load between the two hemispheres (best model: R‐squared = 0.28–0.42). The models showed high generalizability to external test cohorts with data collected at multiple sites. Through a proof‐of‐concept two‐step classification workflow, we also demonstrated possible model translations to a clinical setting.

          DISCUSSION

          This study highlights the promising and limiting aspects of using machine learning to predict tau‐PET from scalable cost‐effective variables, with findings relevant for clinical settings and future research.

          Highlights

          • Accessible variables showed potential in estimating tau tangle load and distribution.

          • Plasma phosphorylated tau‐217 (p‐tau217) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the best predictors of different tau‐PET (positron emission tomography) composites.

          • Machine learning models demonstrated high generalizability across AD cohorts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Array programming with NumPy

            Array programming provides a powerful, compact and expressive syntax for accessing, manipulating and operating on data in vectors, matrices and higher-dimensional arrays. NumPy is the primary array programming library for the Python language. It has an essential role in research analysis pipelines in fields as diverse as physics, chemistry, astronomy, geoscience, biology, psychology, materials science, engineering, finance and economics. For example, in astronomy, NumPy was an important part of the software stack used in the discovery of gravitational waves 1 and in the first imaging of a black hole 2 . Here we review how a few fundamental array concepts lead to a simple and powerful programming paradigm for organizing, exploring and analysing scientific data. NumPy is the foundation upon which the scientific Python ecosystem is constructed. It is so pervasive that several projects, targeting audiences with specialized needs, have developed their own NumPy-like interfaces and array objects. Owing to its central position in the ecosystem, NumPy increasingly acts as an interoperability layer between such array computation libraries and, together with its application programming interface (API), provides a flexible framework to support the next decade of scientific and industrial analysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

              In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                linda.karlsson@med.lu.se
                oskar.hansson@med.lu.se
                Journal
                Alzheimers Dement
                Alzheimers Dement
                10.1002/(ISSN)1552-5279
                ALZ
                Alzheimer's & Dementia
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1552-5260
                1552-5279
                22 February 2025
                February 2025
                : 21
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/alz.v21.2 )
                : e14600
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Clinical Memory Research Unit Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö Lund University Lund Sweden
                [ 2 ] Department of Clinical Sciences SciLifeLab Lund University Lund Sweden
                [ 3 ] Centre for Mathematical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
                [ 4 ] Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 7 ] Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 8 ] University of Cambridge Department of Psychology Cambridge Biomedical Campus Cambridge UK
                [ 9 ] Memory Clinic Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
                [ 10 ] Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands
                [ 11 ] Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology the Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Mölndal Sweden
                [ 12 ] Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience Maurice Wohl Institute Clinical Neuroscience King's College London London UK
                [ 13 ] Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal Sweden
                [ 14 ] Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Institute of Neurology Queen Square London UK
                [ 15 ] UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL London UK
                [ 16 ] Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases 5/F Building 5E 5 Science Park East Avenue Hong Kong Science Park Clear Water Bay Hong Kong China
                [ 17 ] Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
                [ 18 ] Paris Brain Institute ICM Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital Sorbonne University Paris France
                [ 19 ] Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center Division of Life Sciences and Medicine and Department of Neurology Institute on Aging and Brain Disorders University of Science and Technology of China and First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Hefei Anhui P.R. China
                [ 20 ] Department of Neurology Memory and Aging Center Weill Institute for Neurosciences University of California San Francisco California USA
                [ 21 ] Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Linda Karlsson and Oskar Hansson, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, BMC C11, Lund University, Box 117, SE‐22100 Lund, Sweden.

                Email: linda.karlsson@ 123456med.lu.se and oskar.hansson@ 123456med.lu.se

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-772X
                Article
                ALZ14600
                10.1002/alz.14600
                11846480
                39985487
                d778ca8f-9802-48ea-a3dd-1a7263514336
                © 2025 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 13 January 2025
                : 15 October 2024
                : 14 January 2025
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 16, Words: 10511
                Funding
                Funded by: Science for Life Laboratory , doi 10.13039/501100009252;
                Award ID: KAW 2020.0239
                Funded by: Skånes universitetssjukhus , doi 10.13039/501100011077;
                Award ID: 2020‐O000028
                Funded by: EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research , doi 10.13039/100013278;
                Award ID: 2019‐03401
                Funded by: Parkinsonfonden , doi 10.13039/100008444;
                Award ID: 1412/22
                Funded by: Hjärnfonden , doi 10.13039/501100003792;
                Award ID: FO2021‐0293
                Award ID: FO2023‐0163
                Funded by: Alzheimerfonden , doi 10.13039/501100008599;
                Award ID: AF‐980907
                Award ID: AF‐994229
                Funded by: Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse , doi 10.13039/501100004063;
                Award ID: 2022‐0231
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet , doi 10.13039/501100004359;
                Award ID: 2022‐00775
                Award ID: 2021‐02219
                Award ID: 2018‐02052
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Association , doi 10.13039/100000957;
                Award ID: ZEN24‐1069572
                Award ID: SG‐23‐1061717
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council , doi 10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: ADG‐101096455
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging , doi 10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: R01AG083740
                Funded by: WASP and DDLS Joint call for research projects
                Award ID: WASP/DDLS22‐066
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2025
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.4 mode:remove_FC converted:25.02.2025

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content94

                Most referenced authors2,612