1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Novel Method for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of the Cement Sheath Based on Hollow-Cylinder Specimen and Multiaxial Load Tests

      , , , ,
      SPE Journal
      Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Mechanical properties such as Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and strength are important parameters for evaluating the cement sheath integrity. However, the current triaxial testing methods for the mechanical properties of intact-cylinder cement specimens ignore the “ring” shape of the wellbore cement sheath and its nonuniform 3D stress distribution, which may lead to deviations from the actual mechanical properties of the wellbore cement sheath that can affect the theoretical analysis results. In this study, we designed a hollow-cylinder cement specimen to address the aforementioned conditions and conducted uni, tri, and multiaxial compression tests to analyze the differences in the deformation, damage, and mechanical failure of the hollow- and intact-cylinder cement specimens. It was found that under the same confining pressure, the Young’s modulus of the hollow-cylinder cement specimen with hole pressure was approximately 1.2 times that of the intact-cylinder cement specimen; however, the difference in Poisson’s ratio was not significant. The uniformity of the radial and circumferential stress distributions in the hollow-cylinder cement specimens was the main factor affecting the volumetric strain curves and the damage threshold. Under tri and multiaxial compression conditions, the deviatoric stress of the hollow-cylinder cement specimens was higher than that of the intact-cylinder cement specimens. Compared with the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, the twin-shear unified strength theory can more accurately reflect the relationships between the radial, circumferential, and axial stresses and the strength of the hollow-cylinder cement specimens. Through a failure test of the cement sheath based on a self-developed wellbore simulation device, it was verified that the mechanical properties of the hollow-cylinder cement specimens can better reflect the failure law of the wellbore cement sheath compared with intact-cylinder cement specimens. The findings of this study can contribute to the understanding of the mechanical behavior of wellbore cement sheaths.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A new true triaxial cell for testing mechanical properties of rock, and its use to determine rock strength and deformability of Westerly granite

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Experimental study on deformation, peak strength and crack damage behavior of hollow sandstone under conventional triaxial compression

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cement Sheath Failure Mechanisms: Numerical Estimates to Design for Long-Term Well Integrity

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SPE Journal
                Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
                1086-055X
                1930-0220
                December 21 2022
                June 14 2023
                December 21 2022
                June 14 2023
                : 28
                : 03
                : 950-964
                Article
                10.2118/214293-PA
                d7785f2a-9b82-468f-8237-3064256cf723
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article