4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Persistent frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: A population-based cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Frequent emergency department users are patients cumulating at least four visits per year. Few studies have focused on persistent frequent users, who maintain their frequent user status for multiple consecutive years. This study targets an adult population with chronic conditions, and its aims are: 1) to estimate the prevalence of persistent frequent ED use; 2) to identify factors associated with persistent frequent ED use (frequent use for three consecutive years) and compare their importance with those associated with occasional frequent ED use (frequent use during the year following the index date); and 3) to compare characteristics of “persistent frequent users” to “occasional frequent users” and to “users other than persistent frequent users”.

          Methods

          This is a retrospective cohort study using Quebec administrative databases. All adult patients who visited the emergency department in 2012, diagnosed with chronic conditions, and living in non-remote areas were included. Patients who died in the three years following their index date were excluded. The main outcome was persistent frequent use (≥4 visits per year during three consecutive years). Potential predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, physical and mental comorbidities, and prior healthcare utilization. Odds ratios were computed using multivariable logistic regression.

          Results

          Out of 297,182 patients who visited ED at least once in 2012, 3,357 (1.10%) were persistent frequent users. Their main characteristics included poor socioeconomic status, mental and physical comorbidity, and substance abuse. Those characteristics were also present for occasional frequent users, although with higher percentages for the persistent user group. The number of previous visits to the emergency department was the most important factor in the regression model. The occasional frequent users’ attrition rate was higher between the first and second year of follow-up than between the second and third year.

          Conclusions

          Persistent frequent users are a subpopulation of frequent users with whom they share characteristics, such as physical and mental comorbidities, though the former are poorer and younger. More research is needed in order to better understand what factors can contribute to persistent frequent use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments.

              We identify frequent users of the emergency department (ED) and determine the characteristics of these patients. Using the 2000 to 2001 population-based, nationally representative Community Tracking Study Household Survey, we determined the number of adults (aged 18 and older) making 1 to 7 or more ED visits and the number of visits for which they accounted. Based on the distribution of visits, we established a definition for frequent user of 4 or more visits. Multivariate analysis assessed the likelihood that individuals with specific characteristics used the ED more frequently. An estimated 45.2 million adults had 1 or more ED visits. Overall, 92% of adult users made 3 or fewer visits, accounting for 72% of all adult ED visits; the 8% of users with 4 or more visits were responsible for 28% of adult ED visits. Most frequent users had health insurance (84%) and a usual source of care (81%). Characteristics independently associated with frequent use included poor physical health (odds ratio [OR] 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08 to 3.10), poor mental health (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.42 to 2.02), greater than or equal to 5 outpatient visits annually (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.94 to 4.71), and family income below the poverty threshold (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.28). Uninsured individuals were more likely to report frequent use, but this result was only marginally significant (OR 2.38; 95% CI 0.99 to 5.74). Individuals who lacked a usual source of care were actually less likely to be frequent users. The majority of adults who use the ED frequently have insurance and a usual source of care but are more likely than less frequent users to be in poor health and require medical attention. Additional support systems and better access to alternative sites of care would have the benefit of improving the health of these individuals and may help to reduce ED use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                12 February 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 2
                : e0229022
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d’urgence, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
                [2 ] Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
                [3 ] Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
                [4 ] Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
                [5 ] École des sciences infirmières, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
                Osakidetza Basque Health Service, SPAIN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Dr Alain Vanasse has received grants for unrelated research from AstraZeneca Canada Inc. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors declare no other competing interests.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-9457
                Article
                PONE-D-19-18906
                10.1371/journal.pone.0229022
                7015381
                32050010
                d750e1e6-4da7-4d6c-ab74-c846167dcd6e
                © 2020 Chiu et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 July 2019
                : 28 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000156, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé;
                Award Recipient :
                This study was supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé, the Quebec SPOR SUPPORT Unit, and the Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’université de Sherbrooke.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Endocrinology
                Endocrine Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Metabolic Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Drug Abuse
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Drug Abuse
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Coronary Heart Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Cardiology
                Coronary Heart Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Asthma
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Cohort Studies
                Custom metadata
                Our research team is bound by legal reasons to not divulge any part of the data. The Commission de l’accès à l’information du Québec (CAI) is the provincial organisation that reviews research projects and allows researchers to access health databases. It is also responsible for ensuring their privacy as those databases contain sensitive patient information and it does not legally allow for making any part of them public. Therefore, we are not able to make any part of our data publicly available. Researchers interested in having access to databases used in this study (e.g. MED-ECHO, administrative and physician reimbursement registers) can submit a request to the Research data access point of the Institut de la statistique du Québec/CAI ( https://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/research/#/accueil).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article