4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study evaluates the effectiveness of Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) in treating poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), focusing on functional outcomes, mortality, and complications such as vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and hydrocephalus.

          Methods

          Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central, up to November 2023. Nine studies involving 368 patients were selected based on eligibility criteria focusing on TH in poor-grade SAH patients. Data extraction, bias assessment, and evidence certainty were systematically performed.

          Results

          The primary analysis of unfavorable outcomes in 271 participants showed no significant difference between the TH and standard care groups (risk ratio [RR], 0.87). However, a significant reduction in vasospasm was observed in the TH group (RR, 0.63) among 174 participants. No significant differences were found in DCI, hydrocephalus, and mortality rates in the respective participant groups.

          Conclusions

          TH did not significantly improve primary unfavorable outcomes in poor-grade SAH patients. However, the reduction in vasospasm rates indicates potential specific benefits. The absence of significant findings in other secondary outcomes and mortality highlights the need for further research to better understand TH's role in treating this patient population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

            Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Book: not found

              Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

              Healthcare providers, consumers, researchers and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information, including evidence from healthcare research. It has become impossible for all to have the time and resources to find, appraise and interpret this evidence and incorporate it into healthcare decisions. Cochrane Reviews respond to this challenge by identifying, appraising and synthesizing research-based evidence and presenting it in a standardized format, published in The Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com).<p><i>The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i> contains methodological guidance for the preparation and maintenance of Cochrane intervention reviews. Written in a clear and accessible format, it is the essential manual for all those preparing, maintaining and reading Cochrane reviews. Many of the principles and methods described here are appropriate for systematic reviews applied to other types of research and to systematic reviews of interventions undertaken by others. It is hoped therefore that this book will be invaluable to all those who want to understand the role of systematic reviews, critically appraise published reviews or perform reviews themselves.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acute Crit Care
                Acute Crit Care
                ACC
                Acute and Critical Care
                Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
                2586-6052
                2586-6060
                May 2024
                30 May 2024
                : 39
                : 2
                : 282-293
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Convergence Medicine Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
                [3 ]Bio-Medical Institute of Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [4 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
                [5 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Seungjoo Lee Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea Tel: +82-2-3010-3550, Fax: +82-2-476-6738, E-mail: changhill@ 123456gmail.com
                Jae Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine, 56 Dalseong-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41931, Korea Tel: +82-53-258-4381, Fax:+82-53-258-4388, E-mail: kdhggo@ 123456dsmc.or.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0641-3917
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-7098
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4474-1295
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9720-6037
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-0905
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-0988
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-0595
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-455X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-5668
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5260-1735
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-0331
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-8615
                Article
                acc-2024-00612
                10.4266/acc.2024.00612
                11167421
                38863359
                d750765a-d1cf-4777-baac-bf1b8c41d156
                © 2024 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 8 April 2024
                : 14 May 2024
                : 15 May 2024
                Categories
                Original Article
                Neurosurgery

                hypothermia,intracranial vasospasm,mortality,stroke,subarachnoid hemorrhage

                Comments

                Comment on this article