34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Exposure to Particulate Matter Air Pollution With Semen Quality Among Men in China

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , , MD 2 , , , PhD 3 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is exposure to different fractions of particulate matter (<2.5, 2.5-10, and ≤10 μm in diameter) associated with poor semen quality?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 33 876 Chinese men, decreased total and progressive sperm motility and increased risk of asthenozoospermia were associated with exposure to particulate matter of less than 2.5 μm and 10.0 μm or less.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that control measures to reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter may help increase male fertility and reduce the risk of asthenozoospermia.

          Abstract

          This cohort study evaluates the association between exposure to different particulate matter fractions and poor semen quality among Chinese men whose wives underwent assisted reproductive technology procedures.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The health effects of exposure to particulate matter (PM) on male fertility remain unclear. Although PM exposure has been linked with semen quality, the results were inconsistent.

          Objective

          To examine the association of different size fractions of PM (<2.5 μm [PM 2.5], 2.5-10 μm [PM 2.5-10], and ≤10 μm [PM 10]) exposure with semen quality in China.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data on men whose wives underwent assisted reproductive technology procedures in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. Participants were from 340 prefecture-level cities of China and were followed up from the date of their first visit until December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2020, to May 15, 2021.

          Exposures

          Exposure to PM 2.5, PM 2.5-10, and PM 10 during the entire period (0-90 days before semen ejaculation) and key periods of sperm development (0-9, 10-14, and 70-90 days before semen ejaculation).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Semen quality, including sperm count, concentration, and motility.

          Results

          A total of 33 876 men were included in the final analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 34.1 (5.7) years and large variation of PM exposure. For example, the median exposure to PM 2.5 during the entire period of sperm development was 46.05 (IQR, 34.38-61.65) μg/m 3. During the entire period of sperm development, exposures to higher levels of PM were significantly associated with lower total and progressive sperm motility. For total sperm motility, an IQR increase in PM 2.5 exposure was associated with an estimated effect decrease of −3.60% (95% CI, −3.93% to −3.26%); an increase in PM 2.5-10 exposure, with an estimated effect decrease of −0.45% (95% CI, −0.76% to −0.14%); and an increase in PM 10 exposure, with an estimated effect decrease of −2.44% (95% CI, −2.91% to −1.96%). Similar results were observed for progressive motility. An IQR increase in PM 2.5 or PM 10 exposures was associated with an estimated effect decrease on sperm progressive motility of −1.87% (95% CI, −2.37% to −1.36%) and −1.05% (95% CI, −1.45% to −0.64%), respectively. However, no significant associations were observed between PM exposure during the entire period of sperm development and sperm count or concentration.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings suggest that PM exposure may adversely affect sperm motility and highlight the need to reduce ambient particulate air pollution exposure for reproductive-aged men.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015

          Summary Background Exposure to ambient air pollution increases morbidity and mortality, and is a leading contributor to global disease burden. We explored spatial and temporal trends in mortality and burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution from 1990 to 2015 at global, regional, and country levels. Methods We estimated global population-weighted mean concentrations of particle mass with aerodynamic diameter less than 2·5 μm (PM2·5) and ozone at an approximate 11 km × 11 km resolution with satellite-based estimates, chemical transport models, and ground-level measurements. Using integrated exposure–response functions for each cause of death, we estimated the relative risk of mortality from ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and lower respiratory infections from epidemiological studies using non-linear exposure–response functions spanning the global range of exposure. Findings Ambient PM2·5 was the fifth-ranking mortality risk factor in 2015. Exposure to PM2·5 caused 4·2 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·7 million to 4·8 million) deaths and 103·1 million (90·8 million 115·1 million) disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in 2015, representing 7·6% of total global deaths and 4·2% of global DALYs, 59% of these in east and south Asia. Deaths attributable to ambient PM2·5 increased from 3·5 million (95% UI 3·0 million to 4·0 million) in 1990 to 4·2 million (3·7 million to 4·8 million) in 2015. Exposure to ozone caused an additional 254 000 (95% UI 97 000–422 000) deaths and a loss of 4·1 million (1·6 million to 6·8 million) DALYs from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2015. Interpretation Ambient air pollution contributed substantially to the global burden of disease in 2015, which increased over the past 25 years, due to population ageing, changes in non-communicable disease rates, and increasing air pollution in low-income and middle-income countries. Modest reductions in burden will occur in the most polluted countries unless PM2·5 values are decreased substantially, but there is potential for substantial health benefits from exposure reduction. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Health Effects Institute.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.

            Infertility is estimated to affect as many as 186 million people worldwide. Although male infertility contributes to more than half of all cases of global childlessness, infertility remains a woman's social burden. Unfortunately, areas of the world with the highest rates of infertility are often those with poor access to assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). In such settings, women may be abandoned to their childless destinies. However, emerging data suggest that making ART accessible and affordable is an important gender intervention. To that end, this article presents an overview of what we know about global infertility, ART and changing gender relations, posing five key questions: (i) why is infertility an ongoing global reproductive health problem? (ii) What are the gender effects of infertility, and are they changing over time? (iii) What do we know about the globalization of ART to resource-poor settings? (iv) How are new global initiatives attempting to improve access to IVF? (v) Finally, what can be done to overcome infertility, help the infertile and enhance low-cost IVF (LCIVF) activism?
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care.

              INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present study was to review existing population surveys on the prevalence of infertility and proportion of couples seeking medical help for fertility problems. METHODS Population surveys, reporting the prevalence of infertility and proportion of couples seeking help in more and less developed countries, were reviewed. RESULTS Estimates on the prevalence of infertility came from 25 population surveys sampling 172 413 women. The 12-month prevalence rate ranged from 3.5% to 16.7% in more developed nations and from 6.9% to 9.3% in less-developed nations, with an estimated overall median prevalence of 9%. In 17 studies sampling 6410 women, the proportion of couples seeking medial care was, on average, 56.1% (range 42-76.3%) in more developed countries and 51.2% (range 27-74.1%) in less developed countries. The proportion of people actually receiving care was substantially less, 22.4%. Based on these estimates and on the current world population, 72.4 million women are currently infertile; of these, 40.5 million are currently seeking infertility medical care. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence indicates a 9% prevalence of infertility (of 12 months) with 56% of couples seeking medical care. These estimates are lower than those typically cited and are remarkably similar between more and less developed countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                17 February 2022
                February 2022
                17 February 2022
                : 5
                : 2
                : e2148684
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
                [2 ]Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
                [3 ]School of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 24, 2021.
                Published: February 17, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Zhao Y et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Authors: Jing Cai, PhD, School of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, PO Box 249, 130 Dong-An Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China ( jingcai@ 123456fudan.edu.cn ) and Jiaying Lin, MD, Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhi-zao-ju Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China ( lemon_1114@ 123456126.com ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Lin and Cai had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Zhao and Zhu contributed equally to the study and are considered co–first authors.
                Concept and design: Zhao, Zhu, Cai.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Zhao.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Zhu, Lin, Cai.
                Statistical analysis: Zhao, Zhu, Cai.
                Obtained funding: Zhao.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Zhu, Lin, Cai.
                Supervision: Cai.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant 21QA1407300 from the Shanghai Rising-Star Program, grants 82173533 and 81803184 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and grant 20ZR1402900 from the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi211336
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684
                8855237
                35175344
                d6d30fd0-377a-480f-92da-4fc5158345c4
                Copyright 2022 Zhao Y et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 29 August 2021
                : 24 December 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Environmental Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content174

                Cited by20

                Most referenced authors702